Started By
Message

re: Would you let your kids play football? Lebron says no.

Posted on 11/14/14 at 10:34 am to
Posted by TexasTiger1185
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2011
13076 posts
Posted on 11/14/14 at 10:34 am to
quote:

I remember getting my bell rung nearly everyday in grade school football. That can't be good for a developing brain.


Grade school is too early. I think most people acknowledge that.

I'll let mine play flag to learn the sport. And if he wants to play in high school he can. I understand the brain is still developing at that age, but I won't ban him from playing a high school sport
Posted by Moustache
GEAUX TIGERS
Member since May 2008
21558 posts
Posted on 11/14/14 at 10:38 am to
quote:

well no shite

its just a risk vs reward thing

if I can remove 1 serious risk without removing any of the rewards, why wouldn't I do that?


Maybe football is rewarding for many. For many, it gives them the opportunity to receive a top notch education. Would Richard Sherman be Stanford-educated without football?

For many it teaches discipline/teamwork, etc. I know you can get that from other sports too, but maybe football is their passion. Baseball/Basketball can be won by an individual in many cases (pitcher dominating) and soccer can be one at the younger levels by having one dominant individual. A dominant RB or QB won't be shite without others to block or stop the other team.

I don't see how you can say it's a HUGE risk. It isn't. It's being sensationalized by the media. Don't get me wrong...the NFL downplaying and flat out ignoring head injuries for so long is deplorable.

However, at the youth level, I don't believe the risk of permanent or serious injury is that great or is much greater than other sports.

I'd venture to say most of us here went to HS with a football program. I'd also venture to say very few of us know people permanently injured or with CTE especially compared to knowing people who died from drugs or car accidents.
Posted by RedRifle
Austin/NO
Member since Dec 2013
8328 posts
Posted on 11/14/14 at 10:38 am to
I agree! I told an African American friend to have his really athletic son play lax and then make sure he applies to Johns Hopkins, Duke or Williams
Posted by Moustache
GEAUX TIGERS
Member since May 2008
21558 posts
Posted on 11/14/14 at 10:38 am to
quote:

'd say the odds of them riding in a car are higher but im no mathematician.




Crap. I messed that up.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73729 posts
Posted on 11/14/14 at 10:41 am to
quote:

died from drugs or car accidents.
quote:

permanently injured or with CTE especially compared t


Quit comparing the two. One occurs immediately the other may take years to appear.

I know plenty of people that smoked in high school and none of them are dead. Must be safe.
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83695 posts
Posted on 11/14/14 at 10:44 am to
quote:

For many, it gives them the opportunity to receive a top notch education. Would Richard Sherman be Stanford-educated without football?


I'm just giving my personal reasons

no Richard Sherman is coming from my semen
Posted by PurpleandGold Motown
Birmingham, Alabama
Member since Oct 2007
22104 posts
Posted on 11/14/14 at 10:45 am to
There's really no point in playing football before 7th or 8th grade. Hell, most of the kids I played with that went on to Division 1 schools didn't start until 9th grade.

If I ever have a son, and he wants to play as a teenager, I wouldn't stand in his way. But there's just no point to the peewee stuff.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
167155 posts
Posted on 11/14/14 at 10:47 am to
lebron is a vagina.
Posted by EvrybodysAllAmerican
Member since Apr 2013
11288 posts
Posted on 11/14/14 at 10:48 am to
The good that comes from football far outweighs the bad. Just have to make sure the kids are taught proper technique.

edit: i dont think its a bad idea to make them wait a few years. Flag football is probably better while theyre still learning the rules, etc.
This post was edited on 11/14/14 at 10:51 am
Posted by LL012697
Member since May 2013
3963 posts
Posted on 11/14/14 at 10:48 am to
quote:

Football's going to die in about twenty years.

Do people really believe this or is it just hyperbole? Football will never die in our lifetimes. It may evolve, potentially even radically, but the demand for it is still there, it'll won't die completely anytime soon
Posted by PoppaD
Texas
Member since Feb 2008
5006 posts
Posted on 11/14/14 at 10:49 am to
quote:

For many it teaches discipline/teamwork, etc.


And for many Mom's teaching teamwork through football is not near as important as keeping there son safe. There are other ways to teach to teach teamwork.

If the Mom does not support the sport and feel good about it, then the precious little boy of theirs is not going to be playing it.

Football is losing support from Mom's all across the country and that will be the downfall if it becomes to rampant. I see it in my wife. She says why should my boy play football when there are other sports with less negatives he could pursue.
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 11/14/14 at 10:50 am to
I would rather my son be a soccer star.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73729 posts
Posted on 11/14/14 at 10:57 am to
quote:

Do people really believe this or is it just hyperbole? Football will never die in our lifetimes.


I believe it will effectively be dead or just a intramural sport of sorts in 50 years.
Posted by PurpleandGold Motown
Birmingham, Alabama
Member since Oct 2007
22104 posts
Posted on 11/14/14 at 11:01 am to
quote:

I would rather my son be a soccer star.



As would many former football players. Several of the parents of the kids on my nephew's soccer team were SEC level athletes -- including football. They don't want their boys playing football or baseball. They want them playing soccer.

I see a bright future for the US on the world stage in the next ten years or so. Football's loss is Futbol's gain.
Posted by Moustache
GEAUX TIGERS
Member since May 2008
21558 posts
Posted on 11/14/14 at 11:03 am to
quote:

I know of two guys around my age group that were paralyzed by football. You don't know when it might happen. I got two concussions playing highschool football myself, but I also got one more snowboarding. At the time I thought seeing stars was just getting my bell rung so I didnt tell anybody and kept playing. No coaches ever even brought up head injuries when I was playing at a very competitive highschool football level.

One thing is for sure for my son, In Texas they start playing full tackle football at a young age. My son wont be participating in that for sure. If he really wants to play football it will be touch or seven on seven and he will only move up to full tackle around middle school sometime.

There is no reason in my head for 5 to 12 years old to be out banging heads against each other. When he gets older I might consider it and I will teach him proper shoulder tackling myself.

The problems come up when you just farm your kid out to a guy reliving his glory years and you don't supervise how he is teaching your kid to play.

All in all, I will probably encourage him to play more games that will give him a lifetime of enjoyment like golf, basketball, etc. Rather then a game he can only play for a few years.



perfectly reasonable. I don't think you need to play tackle football until the middle school level.
Posted by Moustache
GEAUX TIGERS
Member since May 2008
21558 posts
Posted on 11/14/14 at 11:09 am to
quote:

I'm just giving my personal reasons

no Richard Sherman is coming from my semen




Mine either.

Basically, I won't let my kids play tackle until middle school, if that. They can learn the sport by watching and playing 7on7 and stuff.

If it's meant for them to be a pro (highly unlikely) it's their choice. That's what I meant when I said it's their lives/their choice to play.

More than likely my kids will be in band and baseball like me and do neither professionally. I'd rather my kid be academically gifted than athletic any day. But, that's a rarity among more than you would think.
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
83337 posts
Posted on 11/14/14 at 11:10 am to
Baseball is more dangerous than football for kids aged 5-16
Posted by Moustache
GEAUX TIGERS
Member since May 2008
21558 posts
Posted on 11/14/14 at 11:10 am to
quote:

But there's just no point to the peewee stuff.



No doubt. Peewee tackle is more for parents and coaches to relive their glory days or lack therof.

Those kids should work on running, catching, and just general coordination, which is why kids should be playing as many youth sports as possible...baseball, baskeball, 7on7/flag, soccer, etc.

Unfortunately, travel baseball is disqualifying baseball for many.
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
83337 posts
Posted on 11/14/14 at 11:11 am to
quote:

Basically, I won't let my kids play tackle until middle school, if that. They can learn the sport by watching and playing 7on7 and stuff.



So you won't let your kid play football until the age when it might actually start to get dangerous and when kids start to get stronger and more powerful.


Bunch of dumbasses up in here
This post was edited on 11/14/14 at 11:12 am
Posted by Moustache
GEAUX TIGERS
Member since May 2008
21558 posts
Posted on 11/14/14 at 11:12 am to
quote:

I see a bright future for the US on the world stage in the next ten years or so. Football's loss is Futbol's gain.



Pipe.Dream

until the blacks play soccer, US will be average.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram