- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 'Prayer Baby' drowns in church's baptism tank
Posted on 9/25/14 at 5:35 pm to Darth_Vader
Posted on 9/25/14 at 5:35 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
To you the church is guilty because you're against churches and anything bad about them must be and always is true.
More displaced anger and ignorance. It has nothing to do with the church; comically, I have not mentioned religion at all in this thread, but you keep coming back to this angle. A clear sign of poorly thought-out argumentation.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 5:39 pm to Chucktown_Badger
quote:
Maybe it was filled because the kid that died was getting baptized
Doubtful. Pentecostals(and many other Christian denominations besides the Catholic church) do NOT believe in infant baptism.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 5:49 pm to biglego
"God needed another angel I guess"
Oh man! You are hilarious. It is always funny to make light of a person dying....even more so a 22 month old!
And BTW, though you are an obvious atheist, you should still know that people do not become angels. Angels are an entirely different creation than humans.
Oh man! You are hilarious. It is always funny to make light of a person dying....even more so a 22 month old!
And BTW, though you are an obvious atheist, you should still know that people do not become angels. Angels are an entirely different creation than humans.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 5:53 pm to Carolina_Girl
quote:
Serious question...have you ever experienced the death of one of your own children? I have. And being brutally honest here...it really makes you question the premise of a loving God. What possible explanation could anyone give me to explain taking my child that would sooth a mother's heart? There is not one. From anyone, including God himself.
How is it possible to have free will AND a God that protects every move we make?
Posted on 9/25/14 at 5:55 pm to The First Cut
How is it possible for a man to create the universe?
Posted on 9/25/14 at 5:57 pm to The Third Leg
Darth was right, you just want to take on faith.
Man didn't create the universe.
Man didn't create the universe.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 6:00 pm to The First Cut
I don't want to take on faith. Had that been my objective, I would have said something about religion before page six, and before a lengthy discussion of liability in which religion and faith are never mentioned.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 6:08 pm to The Third Leg
Your thinly veiled jabs are transparent to anyone with an IQ north of 80. You don't know anything about this story. You don't know if a baptism had JUST occurred or was soon to occur. Yet somehow you are certain of liability.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 6:10 pm to The Third Leg
quote:
quote: Nope. As long as your fence around it is up to proper code then you are fine..... You sure about that? Because I don't think that is true.
Think about this for a second.....so you are alluding that the millions of swimming pool owners (tend to be people with a little more $$ than the average American--not all, but most) would leave themselves and all their assets open for a suit just to have a pool without any type of protection?
Not a chance.
As a pool owner, I say you are wrong on this. You must have the proper enclosures set forth by parish/county ordinances. Most counties make this info available on their websites now.
If someone jumps the fence and drowns, it is not the home owner's responsibility if he can prove that he abided by all the county laws.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 6:12 pm to The First Cut
None of that really matters. If a baptism had just occurred, why was the pool left unwatched, remaining accessible? That is the very definition of negligence relating to attractive nuisances.
The church owns the church, and the tank -- they are legally liable for them, not the parents of guests.
The church owns the church, and the tank -- they are legally liable for them, not the parents of guests.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 6:14 pm to The Third Leg
If you truly understand ANY subject you know that you cannot make definitive statements with such little information.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 6:21 pm to The First Cut
Of course it's not definitive, but I think it is safe to assume that the church committed errors with their attractive nuisance that enabled this outcome. When you look at the standards of law, it's pretty difficult to surmise conditions that would remove liability from the church. Nobody is really offering any either.
This is a message board, not a court of law. These are the discussions that take place when news breaks here. There is an eight hundred page thread about that kid in Missouri lying around and nobody knew shite for all of it.
This is a message board, not a court of law. These are the discussions that take place when news breaks here. There is an eight hundred page thread about that kid in Missouri lying around and nobody knew shite for all of it.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 6:22 pm to The Third Leg
Keep playing dumb, you're pretty good at it.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 6:24 pm to Green Chili Tiger
Church better start passing around the collection plate to cover their legal fees.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:01 pm to The Third Leg
quote:
How tall does the fence need to be?
No hard rule. You just need to show reasonable measure to keep outsiders, including children, from mistakenly drowning in your pool. Something that would hold up in court.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:12 pm to Darth_Vader
Did you really just use the word closed-minded prejudice in a sentence?
Liability of their own facility is not the only thing churches are allowed to get away with in this country, but 5 minutes of open-minded research will reveal that.
Liability of their own facility is not the only thing churches are allowed to get away with in this country, but 5 minutes of open-minded research will reveal that.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:14 pm to The Third Leg
It's 33 inches of water you overly litigious dickhead.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:18 pm to Sev09
quote:
No hard rule. You just need to show reasonable measure to keep outsiders, including children, from mistakenly drowning in your pool. Something that would hold up in court.
Hmmmmm...
Posted on 9/25/14 at 10:22 pm to Sid in Lakeshore
quote:
It's 33 inches of water you overly litigious dickhead.
How tall is the median two-year-old? What about the seventy-fifth percentile?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News