- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Elizabeth Warren's Answer For Student Loan Debt - Tax Rich People
Posted on 8/25/14 at 12:08 am to Taxing Authority
Posted on 8/25/14 at 12:08 am to Taxing Authority
Yes, everyone gets a Porsche. That is exactly what I said you dumbass.
Your being arrogant in the fact that you assume everyone with student loans is some frick up with a worthless degree.
The economy is partly to blame for student loan default rates. Lowering the interest rate will allow for more flexibility to pay back loans, allow a lot of these people to save money to buy houses and cars, allow them to move on with their life/find someone willing to marry them and their student loans, it will also stimulate he economy by giving people more purchasing power.
Oh but you think frick them because they tried to get an education. frick them because there is someone on capital hill finally making an argument for the middle class. frick them because they are going to raise taxes on people who enjoy tax breaks, low interest products.
I do believe it is wrong for the federal government to profit off of its individuals. That's the fiscal conservative coming out in me.
Your being arrogant in the fact that you assume everyone with student loans is some frick up with a worthless degree.
The economy is partly to blame for student loan default rates. Lowering the interest rate will allow for more flexibility to pay back loans, allow a lot of these people to save money to buy houses and cars, allow them to move on with their life/find someone willing to marry them and their student loans, it will also stimulate he economy by giving people more purchasing power.
Oh but you think frick them because they tried to get an education. frick them because there is someone on capital hill finally making an argument for the middle class. frick them because they are going to raise taxes on people who enjoy tax breaks, low interest products.
I do believe it is wrong for the federal government to profit off of its individuals. That's the fiscal conservative coming out in me.
This post was edited on 8/25/14 at 12:11 am
Posted on 8/25/14 at 5:48 am to cjared036
quote:
The economy is partly to blame for student loan default rates. Lowering the interest rate will allow for more flexibility to pay back loans, allow a lot of these people to save money to buy houses and cars, allow them to move on with their life/find someone willing to marry them and their student loans, it will also stimulate he economy by giving people more purchasing power.
Oh but you think frick them because they tried to get an education. frick them because there is someone on capital hill finally making an argument for the middle class. frick them because they are going to raise taxes on people who enjoy tax breaks, low interest products.
I do believe it is wrong for the federal government to profit off of its individuals. That's the fiscal conservative coming out in me.
lol, just lol
eta: particularly the bolded parts, and the notion of loans being the way the government "profits off of its individuals", but raising taxes on someone other than the poster is somehow not
This post was edited on 8/25/14 at 5:53 am
Posted on 8/25/14 at 6:46 am to cjared036
quote:Yes it is, and so some government redress could be justified. Not one that discourages repayment, or discounts penalties for nonpayment though.
The economy is partly to blame for student loan default rates.
Schools should also share major blame. If their graduates suffer significant unemployment in a field, they should at the least have to fully disclose the fact to students. Frankly, I'm with the Delaware Senator, schools should bear some portion of the financial burden.
But ultimately, burden of responsibility lies with the individual.
In this case with the student. Correct?
It is a burden which should be shouldered by those who chose to create it, not by those who did not.
Posted on 8/25/14 at 9:31 am to cjared036
quote:Nope. Never said that. I assume everyone that refuses to pay them back, and thinks someone else should pay it for them is an immature frick up. Huge difference.
you assume everyone with student loans is some frick up with a worthless degree.
quote:The reason really is irrelevant.
The economy is partly to blame for student loan default rates.
But let's assume it was... If the economy was good... Would you support raising the amount borrowers have to pay back?
quote:It is not the government'a job to ensure you do any of these things. It's not the governments job to ensure you have a house and a car. It's not governments job to ensure you find a wife/husband. It certainly isn't the job of "the rich" to solve these personal problems.
Lowering the interest rate will allow for more flexibility to pay back loans, allow a lot of these people to save money to buy houses and cars, allow them to move on with their life/find someone willing to marry them and their student loans
quote:Why should we reward failure? Secondly, no one is saying they should be punished for getting an education. They should face the consequences of keeping their promise to pay back the money. Why do you have a problem with honesty?
Oh but you think frick them because they tried to get an education.
quote:
frick them because there is someone on capital hill finally making an argument for the middle class.
quote:yeah. There are no tax benefits for "the poor" and "middle class"...
frick them because they are going to raise taxes on people who enjoy tax breaks, low interest products.
It still makes no difference.
The borrowers made a promise to pay the loans back. Why should "the rich" have to pay back--what someone else promised to pay back? They had NO participation in the transaction, no benefit, yet somehow have to pay for it? That doesn't seem "fair" to me.
quote:We have vastly different definitions of fiscal conservative.
I do believe it is wrong for the federal government to profit off of its individuals. That's the fiscal conservative coming out in me.
This post was edited on 8/25/14 at 9:47 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News