- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Father (Not Guilty) of killing drunk driver who killed his sons.Update
Posted on 8/18/14 at 7:36 pm to TH03
Posted on 8/18/14 at 7:36 pm to TH03
quote:
it was definitely premeditated and if found guilty, he will deserve the punishment.
When do you testify? The prosecution has this in the bag. The defense might as well take a plea deal knowing you're the star witness.
This post was edited on 8/18/14 at 7:37 pm
1
Posted on 8/18/14 at 7:37 pm to Tigerlaff
This is going to be tough to prove.
Seems you'd need more than motive to convict of something like this.
Seems you'd need more than motive to convict of something like this.
Posted on 8/18/14 at 7:37 pm to REG861
quote:
That doesn't fricking matter, he did. If he was still alive, do you think he'd say "hey, sorry about your kids, but I didn't mean to do it!" I'm sure the kids' mother is consoled by the fact that he didn't ACTIVELY set out to kill them.
what does this have to do with the law?
quote:
He ACTIVELY was the driver when he plowed into them drunk. He wasn't PASSIVELY driving, was he? (unless he was so drunk he was asleep at the wheel).
oh lord, I'm not even going to attempt to argue this drivel.
quote:
Send his widow a Hallmark card for me
separate your emotions from the law if you want an actual discussion on this. you just sound like an idiot.
Posted on 8/18/14 at 7:38 pm to REG861
quote:
When do you testify? The prosecution has this in the bag. The defense might as well take a plea deal knowing you're the star witness.
damn, you are so upset
Posted on 8/18/14 at 7:38 pm to TH03
quote:
quote:
Send his widow a Hallmark card for me
separate your emotions from the law if you want an actual discussion on this. you just sound like an idiot.
You're the one appointing himself judge, jury, and executioner like you're the guy's brother or something.
Posted on 8/18/14 at 7:38 pm to TH03
Some laws are far older and run far deeper than those men have set to paper.
The shedding of innocent blood, accident or no, is one of those.
If on a jury, I wouldn't convict him.
Same with the situation of that child molester who kidnapped someone and got his brains blown out by the dad.
Sometimes a crime calls for swift justice at the hands of those who have the ancient rights.
The shedding of innocent blood, accident or no, is one of those.
If on a jury, I wouldn't convict him.
Same with the situation of that child molester who kidnapped someone and got his brains blown out by the dad.
Sometimes a crime calls for swift justice at the hands of those who have the ancient rights.
Posted on 8/18/14 at 7:39 pm to TH03
quote:
damn, you are so upset
Me? You're the one dominating every single page of this thread. You're also well known to be a drama queen on this site
Posted on 8/18/14 at 7:39 pm to REG861
quote:
You're the one appointing himself judge, jury, and executioner like you're the guy's brother or something.
I should definitely act like a menopausal woman instead. my mistake
Posted on 8/18/14 at 7:39 pm to Patrick_Bateman
quote:Agreed, theres a lot of " turn the other cheek" posts here but I hope I never have to decide how I would handle the needless, careless loss of my child.
He should be convicted and go to prison. But, in a similar situation, I too would have murdered a drunk driver who had killed my two sons. It's a crime I'd be willing to pay the price for.
Posted on 8/18/14 at 7:40 pm to TH03
quote:
I should definitely act like a menopausal woman instead
You aren't?
Posted on 8/18/14 at 7:40 pm to REG861
I'm not the one arguing based on emotions. that's you.
your "not uh, you are" retorts do nothing to prove otherwise.
your "not uh, you are" retorts do nothing to prove otherwise.
Posted on 8/18/14 at 7:41 pm to TH03
quote:
I'm not the one arguing based on emotions. that's you.
your "not uh, you are" retorts do nothing to prove otherwise.
k
Posted on 8/18/14 at 7:41 pm to bencoleman
the man does a good deed and has to go to trial. There needs to be more good men like this in the world 
Posted on 8/18/14 at 7:42 pm to fr33manator
quote:
Same with the situation of that child molester who kidnapped someone and got his brains blown out by the dad. Sometimes a crime calls for swift justice at the hands of those who have the ancient rights.
Are you seriously trying to compare a guy driving drunk and accidentally killing 2 kids with someone that actually sets out on purpose to hurt/abuse a child??
You can't go out and kill someone because they drove drunk and killed your children.
This post was edited on 8/18/14 at 7:43 pm
Posted on 8/18/14 at 7:42 pm to Patrick_Bateman
quote:
It's a crime I'd be willing to pay the price for.
Posted on 8/18/14 at 7:43 pm to Patrick_Bateman
quote:
It's a crime I'd be willing to pay the price for.
You would be safe if I was on the jury. All it takes is 1.
Posted on 8/18/14 at 7:43 pm to REG861
quote:
REG861
Downvote dumbass
Posted on 8/18/14 at 7:44 pm to bencoleman
quote:
quote:
REG861
Downvote dumbass
A callout AND a downvote?
Posted on 8/18/14 at 7:44 pm to TH03
quote:
separate your emotions from the law if you want an actual discussion on this
Jury Nullification?
Posted on 8/18/14 at 7:44 pm to TH03
quote:
it's not petty, the title clearly states your opinion is that he is guilty.
if you're a lawyer, you probably shouldn't be determining the results of the case before the trial starts.
Page 4 of 23
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News