Started By
Message

re: Duck Stamp Price Increase - Call your Congressman

Posted on 8/5/14 at 10:54 am to
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 8/5/14 at 10:54 am to
Duck stamps are a tax imposed on duck hunters.
Posted by PapaPogey
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2008
39624 posts
Posted on 8/5/14 at 10:55 am to
Pretty sure a certain percentage of the cost goes to conservation and protection of national refuges
Posted by tight lines
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2012
348 posts
Posted on 8/5/14 at 10:57 am to
quote:

Pretty sure a certain percentage of the cost goes to conservation and protection of national refuges


The article in the OP confirms this
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 8/5/14 at 11:03 am to
Is it a tax per duck?
Posted by tight lines
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2012
348 posts
Posted on 8/5/14 at 11:05 am to
No, it's a flat fee of $15 from the Feds and $5 from the state. Just like a big game or saltwater fishing license, its in addition to the regular hunting license.
Posted by xenon16
Metry Brah
Member since Sep 2008
3533 posts
Posted on 8/5/14 at 11:13 am to
quote:

The landowner has the control over the PRIVATE LAND.
Once an easement is in place, the landowner has control of the land as long as it is consistent with the terms of the easement.

My reference was to "they" as in the government has no control over private land. And there is no requirement for a private landowner to sign an easement.

I love how DU always gets brought into these discussions... and how they are never in the interest of hunters...

Currently:
quote:

Ninety-eight cents out of every dollar generated by the sale of Federal Duck Stamps goes directly to purchase or lease wetland habitat for protection in the National Wildlife Refuge System.

Posted by shooter35
Member since Oct 2011
121 posts
Posted on 8/5/14 at 11:16 am to
quote:

And there is no requirement for a private landowner to sign an easement.


Right. So after I decide to place my 5000 acres into this easement who pays to turn my farm/pasture into "ducky land?"
Posted by tight lines
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2012
348 posts
Posted on 8/5/14 at 11:19 am to
quote:

Ninety-eight cents out of every dollar generated by the sale of Federal Duck Stamps goes directly to purchase or lease wetland habitat for protection in the National Wildlife Refuge System.


Is that from DUs website? If that trend were continued, I would love to pay more for a duck stamp. I just have a tough time paying more now if its all going to private easements when there is still publicly-owned land that can be improved.
Posted by xenon16
Metry Brah
Member since Sep 2008
3533 posts
Posted on 8/5/14 at 11:23 am to
quote:

SEC. 3. ANNUAL REPORT ON EXPENDITURES.

Section 4 of the Migratory Bird Hunting and Conservation Stamp Act
(16 U.S.C. 718d) is further amended--

(1) in subsection (c)--

(A) by striking so much as precedes ``The Secretary may'' and inserting the following:
(c) Promotion of Stamp Sales.--''; and
(B) by striking paragraph (2); and
(2) by adding at the end the following:

``(e) Annual Report.--The Secretary shall include in each annual report of the commission under section 3 of the Migratory Bird
Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 715b)--
``(1) a description of activities conducted under subsection (c) in the year covered by the report; and ``(2) an annual assessment of the status of wetlands conservation projects for migratory bird conservation purposes, including a clear and accurate accounting of--
``(A) all expenditures by Federal and State agencies under this section; and ``(B) all expenditures made for fee-simple acquisition of Federal lands in the United States, including the amount paid and acreage of each parcel acquired in each acquisition.''.


BTW, since I'm all about everyone having their opinion and voice, Vitter co-authored an identical bill in the Senate. So you may want to call him too
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 8/5/14 at 11:23 am to
Isn't duck hunting very popular right now? What about the money from those additional hunters?

What about the tax revenue from all the record ammo sales?
Posted by xenon16
Metry Brah
Member since Sep 2008
3533 posts
Posted on 8/5/14 at 11:25 am to
No, from the US FWS
LINK

Posted by tight lines
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2012
348 posts
Posted on 8/5/14 at 11:26 am to
Are you saying that because of those provisions, the chances of cronyism/sketchy transactions are diminished?
Posted by xenon16
Metry Brah
Member since Sep 2008
3533 posts
Posted on 8/5/14 at 11:30 am to
That tax revenue is earmarked to be sent to the individual states under Pittman-Robertson. The funding is distributed to the states, but states are required to match $1 for every $3 of federal funding. It is to be spent on hunter's safety and shooting programs, habitat, and research.

I have no idea if it has been allocated and distributed. Larry would have to answer that.
Posted by Mung
NorCal
Member since Aug 2007
9054 posts
Posted on 8/5/14 at 11:30 am to
quote:

Duck stamps are a tax imposed on duck hunters


Oh good Lord, you can't afford an extra $10? Do you know how many refuges where we hunt have been acquired with duck stamp money?

As to DU, those nets they built at the Arky border to short stop the ducks that belong to us in LA are the problem. Until the nets come down i can't support them.
Posted by xenon16
Metry Brah
Member since Sep 2008
3533 posts
Posted on 8/5/14 at 11:32 am to
I'm saying that transparency is good. The fact that they have to report annually, and account for where the dollars go, means that there is LESS likelihood that the money gets spent elsewhere, like so many other Federal programs
This post was edited on 8/5/14 at 11:35 am
Posted by shooter35
Member since Oct 2011
121 posts
Posted on 8/5/14 at 11:34 am to
quote:

Oh good Lord, you can't afford an extra $10? Do you know how many refuges where we hunt have been acquired with duck stamp money?


That's not what the additional money is being spent on jackass.

Read first. Then make your dumb comment.
Posted by tight lines
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2012
348 posts
Posted on 8/5/14 at 11:36 am to
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
57586 posts
Posted on 8/5/14 at 11:41 am to
quote:

The U.S. House of Representatives Natural Resources Committee yesterday passed the Federal Duck Stamp Act of 2014, which would raise the price of a federal duck stamp to $25 and dedicate the increase to conservation easements with private landowners.


No necessarily a bad thing. Conservation Easement
This post was edited on 8/5/14 at 11:48 am
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 8/5/14 at 11:41 am to
quote:

Oh good Lord, you can't afford an extra $10? Do you know how many refuges where we hunt have been acquired with duck stamp money?


Duck stamps at any price are a tax.

Hunting licenses at any price are also a tax.

Why the eruption?
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 8/5/14 at 11:42 am to
quote:

Duck Stamp Price Increase - Call your Congressman That tax revenue is earmarked to be sent to the individual states under Pittman-Robertson. The funding is distributed to the states, but states are required to match $1 for every $3 of federal funding. It is to be spent on hunter's safety and shooting programs, habitat, and research. I have no idea if it has been allocated and distributed. Larry would have to answer that.


Thanks.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram