- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
What's wrong with selling public assets?
Posted on 6/15/14 at 2:32 pm
Posted on 6/15/14 at 2:32 pm
I've read several opinion pieces over the last few months that say it is wrong to sell public stuff to meet debts.
IE, Detroit is in the shitter. The Detroit Museum has some expensive art. But they can't sell it because it is 'immoral.'
Here is my hypothetical. Let's say that the Flint, Mich. Museum has a Picasso valued at 5M. Flint is 5M in the hole. Why shouldn't they be able to sell the Picasso and pay off the debt?
Is the buyer going to burn the Picasso just for fun? Are that many people in Flint going to be deprived of seeing it? Will it negatively effect their lives that much?
IE, Detroit is in the shitter. The Detroit Museum has some expensive art. But they can't sell it because it is 'immoral.'
Here is my hypothetical. Let's say that the Flint, Mich. Museum has a Picasso valued at 5M. Flint is 5M in the hole. Why shouldn't they be able to sell the Picasso and pay off the debt?
Is the buyer going to burn the Picasso just for fun? Are that many people in Flint going to be deprived of seeing it? Will it negatively effect their lives that much?
Posted on 6/15/14 at 2:50 pm to Zach
If it was a private invidual, what do think the individual would be required to do by the government?
It shouldn't be any different, there are consequences to overspending and not being able to pay your bills. They should liquidate the whole mother fricker.
It shouldn't be any different, there are consequences to overspending and not being able to pay your bills. They should liquidate the whole mother fricker.
Posted on 6/15/14 at 2:52 pm to Zach
I agree. Hell, sell land and assets if need be
Eta: it's just another excuse by government to kick the can down the road. They want raised tax income, which makes them stronger. Not liquidating, which makes them weaker.
Maybe we should start garnishing the govt paychecks of those responsible so they help pay as well.
Eta: it's just another excuse by government to kick the can down the road. They want raised tax income, which makes them stronger. Not liquidating, which makes them weaker.
Maybe we should start garnishing the govt paychecks of those responsible so they help pay as well.
This post was edited on 6/15/14 at 2:54 pm
Posted on 6/15/14 at 2:53 pm to Zach
I see no problem with it. All of the federal lands should be up for sle until the government pays down its debts.
Posted on 6/15/14 at 2:53 pm to Zach
The only assets the government should have are those necessary to perform its required functions. Selling assets that are going unused should be a no brainer.
Posted on 6/15/14 at 2:55 pm to Zach
Part of me says no, because where would it end? Then , I say "But in reality we've sold our kids future, our own morality, and some of us have sold America's future, for pie in the sky politics, so they can feel good that their side is in charge...Hell, sell it all. What good is it all anyway, cause without freedom, its all a pile of s2#+, anyway...
Posted on 6/15/14 at 11:36 pm to Zach
quote:
Are that many people in Flint going to be deprived of seeing it?
they'd be more likely to steal or burn it.
Posted on 6/16/14 at 5:52 am to Zach
Museums normally operate autonomously which is what the DIA is trying to do after this bankruptcy and not be part of the city government.
Individuals donate and museums procure items for future generations. Selling Yellowstone, the Washington Monument or the Declaration of Independence doesn't sound particularly appealing to me.
Individuals donate and museums procure items for future generations. Selling Yellowstone, the Washington Monument or the Declaration of Independence doesn't sound particularly appealing to me.
Posted on 6/16/14 at 8:16 am to Zach
Nothing. LSU sold off a bunch of land south of campus a few years ago.
Posted on 6/16/14 at 9:03 am to Zach
quote:
I've read several opinion pieces over the last few months that say it is wrong to sell public stuff to meet debts.
I read the last night that we had $200 + Trillion in public assets so it is irrelevant what our unfunded liabilities are. I am not sure if that is true and have not seen it anywhere reliable. But, if we have that much in assets then why are we getting taxed?!
Posted on 6/16/14 at 9:10 am to Zach
Like when Chicago sold it's parking system rights? Maybe an Arab wealth fund will swoop in and buy Detroit. Wouldn't that be nice?
Looks like selling public assets at absurd discounts worked well for Russia when the USSR collapsed, privatization by way of shady deals. I mean, look at all those new billionaires.
Looks like selling public assets at absurd discounts worked well for Russia when the USSR collapsed, privatization by way of shady deals. I mean, look at all those new billionaires.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News