- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 9 reasons why public educ fails
Posted on 4/13/14 at 11:16 am to OleWar
Posted on 4/13/14 at 11:16 am to OleWar
quote:
I have a theory, that the liberation of women has been a prime factor in the failure of public schools.
Once upon a time the most intelligent and competent women became school teachers, it was the hight of success for an intelligent women. Now ambitious intelligent women become doctors, lawyers, business leaders etc etc. It was the way our society was ordered.
The gene pool of teachers has now decreased.
Now before all you wackos get all crazy,
This makes a lot of sense, actually. The curriculum for teachers is already adjusted with watered-down subjects like "math for teachers".
The answer is to raise the pay to get more of the brightest back in the profession. But the taxpayers are already aggrieved.
The education establishment is pretty terrible. The right wingers, like who authored this link, are off base complaining that it's some liberal agenda. It isn't. It's about control. The educrats came up with this to guard their profession. Note that universities have resisted it.
Posted on 4/13/14 at 11:24 am to Overbrook
quote:How so?
off base complaining that it's some liberal agenda.
Posted on 4/13/14 at 5:09 pm to Overbrook
quote:Well, one answer on the pay front is differential pay.
The answer is to raise the pay to get more of the brightest back in the profession.
If you want teachers of a certain quality, not all disciplines are equally difficult to attract. The simple fact is, a solid High school calculus teacher is harder to attract at a given salary than a high school art teacher.
There is literally zero reason that if you figure out that you need to pay 25% more to attract good calc teachers that you also give the art teacher a 25% pay raise. You already have a line around the building of those guys trying to get hired(not, these are examples and art is not the only example of easy less difficult disciplines to attract)
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News