- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The Great Gatsby, worth the watch if you've read the book?
Posted on 4/5/14 at 3:00 pm
Posted on 4/5/14 at 3:00 pm
Or will I be bitching it isn't close to the book?
Posted on 4/5/14 at 3:09 pm to tduecen
Hard to tell. I read the book so long ago.
If you like the story, it is worth a watch. Nothing spectacular or even memorable, but I wasn't wanting my time back when I was done.
As usual with Baz Luhrmann, it was a colorful pretty film to watch.
If you like the story, it is worth a watch. Nothing spectacular or even memorable, but I wasn't wanting my time back when I was done.
As usual with Baz Luhrmann, it was a colorful pretty film to watch.
Posted on 4/5/14 at 3:11 pm to tduecen
Better then the 1970's one that's for sure
Posted on 4/5/14 at 3:13 pm to tduecen
It's actually very close to the book. I think the only significant difference is the way he tells the story. In the book, it's like a journal. He's writing the story. In the movie, he is telling the story to a therapist if I remember correctly. But it doesn't affect the story at all. It's just a more visual way to do it than having him write on a piece of paper and narrate what he writes.
You may be disappointed with the soundtrack or you may love it. Either way, it is totally worth watching. I love the book and really enjoyed the movie. Both hold themselves well independently too.
You may be disappointed with the soundtrack or you may love it. Either way, it is totally worth watching. I love the book and really enjoyed the movie. Both hold themselves well independently too.
Posted on 4/5/14 at 3:13 pm to tduecen
I thought it followed closely for the most part. (Granted it's been about 6 years since I read it) Leo is Leo and has a really good performance. Edgerton was phenomenal. Carey Mulligan was meh as Daisy. Sometimes she was good, sometimes she was bad. Tobey McGuire was boring but I couldn't quite figure out if that was purposeful or not considering Nick isn't the most intriguing character anyway. Some ppl complained about the extravagance, over-the-topness that Luhrmann used but to me that falls in line with the book.
Posted on 4/5/14 at 3:25 pm to tduecen
Hated the book, hated the movie.
Posted on 4/5/14 at 3:31 pm to tduecen
I love the book and liked the movie. Just enjoy the performance
Posted on 4/5/14 at 3:50 pm to tduecen
I think the Redford version is a perfect adaptation
Posted on 4/5/14 at 8:04 pm to tduecen
I think it's pretty good. Definitely follows the book. I loved the way the music was worked in, but I know it's not for everyone.
Posted on 4/9/14 at 11:18 pm to tduecen
Beautiful production design. Didn't dig the looped-up modern soundtrack (usually accompanied by frantic editing).
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News