- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The Koch Brothers own Cassidy
Posted on 3/25/14 at 7:03 pm
Posted on 3/25/14 at 7:03 pm
Just saw the ad on the tube. Do they really think that's going to work here in Louisiana?
Posted on 3/25/14 at 7:05 pm to La Place Mike
I'd rather him be owned by Koch Bros. Than a slave to liberal interest groups
Posted on 3/25/14 at 7:42 pm to La Place Mike
Koch brothers or George Soros. Bob Dylan said it best:
But you're gonna have to serve somebody, yes indeed
You're gonna have to serve somebody,
It may be the devil or it may be the Lord
But you're gonna have to serve somebody.
But you're gonna have to serve somebody, yes indeed
You're gonna have to serve somebody,
It may be the devil or it may be the Lord
But you're gonna have to serve somebody.
Posted on 3/25/14 at 8:00 pm to La Place Mike
The Koch brothers!!
OH NOOOOOOOOOOOO
Anything but that!!!!
Life is over.
Happiness is gone forever.
The Koch brothers rule over us.
Please Mr. Soros save us from that.
Turn us into nice mindless liberalistas.
OH NOOOOOOOOOOOO
Anything but that!!!!
Life is over.
Happiness is gone forever.
The Koch brothers rule over us.
Please Mr. Soros save us from that.
Turn us into nice mindless liberalistas.
Posted on 3/25/14 at 8:03 pm to La Place Mike
quote:
The Koch Brothers own Cassidy
Shocker
Posted on 3/25/14 at 9:11 pm to La Place Mike
Mark Begich ads are a bunch of anti Kock Bros propaganda. Must be the dem. hot button of the month.
Posted on 3/25/14 at 9:29 pm to La Place Mike
Cassidy is as MD
No one owns him
No one owns him
Posted on 3/25/14 at 10:24 pm to La Place Mike
That's not true. The Koch Brothers don't own Cassidy, Lane Grigsby owns Cassidy. Lane's the person who convinced Cassidy to run for public office in the first place and has bankrolled all of his campaigns.
Posted on 3/26/14 at 8:22 am to La Place Mike
quote:The vilification of the Koch brothers from the left just flat out amuses me. These same people have zero issues with Soros.
The Koch Brothers own Cassidy
Just another example of how the left views having "all ideas" out there is to have all LIBERAL ideas get debated.
I am fine with anyone using their resources to fight for what they believe in. WTF is wrong with people who are against that?
Posted on 3/26/14 at 9:01 am to La Place Mike
Louisiana needs to dump Landrieu.
Posted on 3/26/14 at 9:36 am to La Place Mike
Is this Koch industries' PAC or is this the Koch family? Either way, why has this family been made into villains in the leftist media?
I know one at least one PAC that represents a Koch competitor that's also backing Cassidy. I'm pretty sure the Koch PAC has backed Landrieu before.
I know one at least one PAC that represents a Koch competitor that's also backing Cassidy. I'm pretty sure the Koch PAC has backed Landrieu before.
This post was edited on 3/26/14 at 9:40 am
Posted on 3/26/14 at 9:48 am to La Place Mike
Landrieu is the type of polician we fought our freedom to never have. Her and her family think they are some Lords or Nobles and have some fiefdom down here. She is owned by unions and liberal money. She has a leadership PAC and will be paid from it the rest of her life.
She is owned.
She is owned.
Posted on 3/26/14 at 10:00 am to La Place Mike
I wonder which group of voters the dems are trying to inform when they run attack adds on the Koch bros and their candidates.
1. I doubt they get anybody to go and vote against Cassidy that was not going to vote at all, just because he is backed by the Koch bros.
2. I assume there are a large number of voters voting party line, no matter what negative attack ads are out there, it won't make a difference because these people won't even look at the names they are voting for.
I personally believe that mass advertising is successful in elections because it gets the thought in peoples heads that someone is bad or good, and when they see them on the ballot they have a negative or positive reaction and they use that as part of the inputs when making their decision on who to vote for. I just think that given how much % of votes are already in hand before election day it is pointless to spend millions to attack people whose names will not even show up on the ballot.
1. I doubt they get anybody to go and vote against Cassidy that was not going to vote at all, just because he is backed by the Koch bros.
2. I assume there are a large number of voters voting party line, no matter what negative attack ads are out there, it won't make a difference because these people won't even look at the names they are voting for.
I personally believe that mass advertising is successful in elections because it gets the thought in peoples heads that someone is bad or good, and when they see them on the ballot they have a negative or positive reaction and they use that as part of the inputs when making their decision on who to vote for. I just think that given how much % of votes are already in hand before election day it is pointless to spend millions to attack people whose names will not even show up on the ballot.
Posted on 3/26/14 at 10:12 am to La Place Mike
Nice losing strategy Dems. Most people either don't know who they are or care if they contribute to candidates.
And if any liberal cares to condemn billionaires contributing to political campaigns Bill Gates and Warren Buffett say hello.
And if any liberal cares to condemn billionaires contributing to political campaigns Bill Gates and Warren Buffett say hello.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News