Started By
Message
locked post

The Koch Brothers own Cassidy

Posted on 3/25/14 at 7:03 pm
Posted by La Place Mike
West Florida Republic
Member since Jan 2004
28853 posts
Posted on 3/25/14 at 7:03 pm
Just saw the ad on the tube. Do they really think that's going to work here in Louisiana?
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99327 posts
Posted on 3/25/14 at 7:05 pm to
I'd rather him be owned by Koch Bros. Than a slave to liberal interest groups
Posted by Turkey_Creek_Tiger
Member since Dec 2012
12343 posts
Posted on 3/25/14 at 7:37 pm to
vote Brannon Mcmorris
Posted by League Champs
Bayou Self
Member since Oct 2012
10340 posts
Posted on 3/25/14 at 7:42 pm to
Koch brothers or George Soros. Bob Dylan said it best:


But you're gonna have to serve somebody, yes indeed
You're gonna have to serve somebody,
It may be the devil or it may be the Lord
But you're gonna have to serve somebody.
Posted by Gray Tiger
Prairieville, LA
Member since Jan 2004
36512 posts
Posted on 3/25/14 at 8:00 pm to
The Koch brothers!!
OH NOOOOOOOOOOOO
Anything but that!!!!

Life is over.
Happiness is gone forever.
The Koch brothers rule over us.
Please Mr. Soros save us from that.
Turn us into nice mindless liberalistas.

Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84927 posts
Posted on 3/25/14 at 8:03 pm to
quote:

The Koch Brothers own Cassidy


Shocker
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
262007 posts
Posted on 3/25/14 at 9:11 pm to
Mark Begich ads are a bunch of anti Kock Bros propaganda. Must be the dem. hot button of the month.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36279 posts
Posted on 3/25/14 at 9:29 pm to
Cassidy is as MD

No one owns him
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67221 posts
Posted on 3/25/14 at 10:24 pm to
That's not true. The Koch Brothers don't own Cassidy, Lane Grigsby owns Cassidy. Lane's the person who convinced Cassidy to run for public office in the first place and has bankrolled all of his campaigns.
Posted by SettleDown
Everywhere
Member since Nov 2013
1333 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 8:22 am to
quote:

The Koch Brothers own Cassidy

The vilification of the Koch brothers from the left just flat out amuses me. These same people have zero issues with Soros.

Just another example of how the left views having "all ideas" out there is to have all LIBERAL ideas get debated.

I am fine with anyone using their resources to fight for what they believe in. WTF is wrong with people who are against that?
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
25415 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 9:01 am to
Louisiana needs to dump Landrieu.
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
25415 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 9:36 am to
Is this Koch industries' PAC or is this the Koch family? Either way, why has this family been made into villains in the leftist media?

I know one at least one PAC that represents a Koch competitor that's also backing Cassidy. I'm pretty sure the Koch PAC has backed Landrieu before.
This post was edited on 3/26/14 at 9:40 am
Posted by lsu13lsu
Member since Jan 2008
11489 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 9:48 am to
Landrieu is the type of polician we fought our freedom to never have. Her and her family think they are some Lords or Nobles and have some fiefdom down here. She is owned by unions and liberal money. She has a leadership PAC and will be paid from it the rest of her life.

She is owned.
Posted by Stuckinthe90s
Dallas, TX
Member since Apr 2013
2578 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 10:00 am to
I wonder which group of voters the dems are trying to inform when they run attack adds on the Koch bros and their candidates.
1. I doubt they get anybody to go and vote against Cassidy that was not going to vote at all, just because he is backed by the Koch bros.
2. I assume there are a large number of voters voting party line, no matter what negative attack ads are out there, it won't make a difference because these people won't even look at the names they are voting for.

I personally believe that mass advertising is successful in elections because it gets the thought in peoples heads that someone is bad or good, and when they see them on the ballot they have a negative or positive reaction and they use that as part of the inputs when making their decision on who to vote for. I just think that given how much % of votes are already in hand before election day it is pointless to spend millions to attack people whose names will not even show up on the ballot.
Posted by Rohan2Reed
Member since Nov 2003
75674 posts
Posted on 3/26/14 at 10:12 am to
Nice losing strategy Dems. Most people either don't know who they are or care if they contribute to candidates.



And if any liberal cares to condemn billionaires contributing to political campaigns Bill Gates and Warren Buffett say hello.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram