re: Why are we paying for kids up to the age of 26?

You are old enough to drink, sign contracts, vote, etc and you still need your mommy and daddy pay for your insurance? Do you need then to cut your meat and wipe your mouth too?

The age 26 regulation is a pure political ploy as is all of this trainwreck.

quote:

---

Nowadays so many kids at the age still live at home with their parents. They should be eligible to be on their parents policies.

---

Living with your parents doesnt equate to still being a kid.. If simple co-habitation is the standard..then let it be the standard

quote:

---

Nowadays so many kids at the age still live at home with their parents. They should be eligible to be on their parents policies.

---

Just because they can't get a job thanks to Obama and his policies?

Or, is it just because they live at home when they should be out on their own because they're a grown-arse adult?

So, why cut it off at 26? Why not make it 56?



And, more importantly, WHO THE F*CK SHOULD PAY FOR IT?

Do you think employers should have to pay for their employees grown-arse ADULT children?

Oh, let me guess, in your demented mind you think it's "FREE" --like unicorns and rainbows.

My premiums went up because of this. Why in the f*ck should I have to pay for some co-workers grown-arse slacker kids?