- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Why are we paying for kids up to the age of 26?
Posted on 3/19/14 at 11:52 am
Posted on 3/19/14 at 11:52 am
Aren't these the people who we want paying into the system? The young healthy people are the ones we are depending on to pay for the old and infirm. Adding them to a family policy won't generate as much revenue. How does this make sense?
14
Posted on 3/19/14 at 11:54 am to Jax-Tiger
And why are we calling people past the age of adulthood kids?
Posted on 3/19/14 at 11:55 am to Jax-Tiger
Kids up to age 26 vote and its a low enough age to where people wont make too big of a fuss over it.
Posted on 3/19/14 at 12:00 pm to Jax-Tiger
quote:
Why are we paying for kids up to the age of 26?
It's a new reality created by liberal progressives not unlike the new norm for unemployment, food stamps, government dependency in general.
Posted on 3/19/14 at 12:02 pm to Jax-Tiger
One can't really answer any of the questions stemming from the ACA in an honest fashion.
Posted on 3/19/14 at 12:03 pm to Jax-Tiger
Since your 30's are the new 20's then your 20's should still be on your parents
Posted on 3/19/14 at 12:04 pm to Jax-Tiger
Aren't they indirectly paying into the system via their parents' payments? Maybe that's why.
Posted on 3/19/14 at 12:05 pm to Jax-Tiger
quote:
Why are we paying for kids up to the age of 26?
So young voters will ignore the fact that Obama's economy is why they can't get a job or can't get the job that they want (pay, career field, etc.).
Posted on 3/19/14 at 12:08 pm to Jax-Tiger
Just a typical liberal mentality of trying to create more dependency while penalizing responsibility.
Posted on 3/19/14 at 12:12 pm to Jax-Tiger
Why26? Why not 27? 28? 30?
Who chose 26 and why?
Who chose 26 and why?
Posted on 3/19/14 at 12:13 pm to Jax-Tiger
dems trying to buy the young vote
Posted on 3/19/14 at 12:13 pm to Jax-Tiger
Idk, but I'm saving myself about $2,000/yr 
Posted on 3/19/14 at 12:24 pm to Jax-Tiger
Please, please, please bring this topic over to the OT. If only for the Lulz!
It's not that their lazy, it's that boomers just fricked everything up for them. It's your fault they live at home and have no job opportunity.
tongue-in-cheek
It's not that their lazy, it's that boomers just fricked everything up for them. It's your fault they live at home and have no job opportunity.
tongue-in-cheek
This post was edited on 3/19/14 at 12:25 pm
Posted on 3/19/14 at 3:20 pm to Jax-Tiger
Idiocy plain and simple. A person at 18 or 21 is considered an adult in all of the fifty states, but the Demons had a great means of selling the ACA to ADULTS make them dependents again with mom and dad paying the bill. They need to pass legislation necessitating being domiciled in the basement to prove that state of affairs to be the fact in truth.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News