- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
S corp or LLC
Posted on 3/15/14 at 9:30 pm
Posted on 3/15/14 at 9:30 pm
What are the pros and cons of each? And which one is better?
This post was edited on 3/15/14 at 9:32 pm
Posted on 3/15/14 at 10:03 pm to gringeaux
Posted on 3/15/14 at 10:19 pm to gringeaux
You can be an LLC and be treated as an S Corp for tax purposes.
Posted on 3/16/14 at 6:24 am to gringeaux
quote:
What are the pros and cons of each? And which one is better?
I'm not saying there is absolutely zero justification for ever doing an S-corporation, but for 90% of small business owners (perhaps more than 90%) - LLC should be the way to go as the organizational structure.
An S-corp would only be superior, in my mind, if you wanted to open it up to investment to corporate entities and/or issues more than 1 class of stock. In virtually all other situations, the LLC would cover you up until the point you needed to reorganize as a full corporation.
This post was edited on 3/16/14 at 6:24 am
Posted on 3/16/14 at 9:22 am to Ace Midnight
quote:I think you have it backwards. An S-corp can't have corporate shareholders, and they are limited to one class of stock. An LLC, on the other hand, can have any type of entity as a member, and it can allocate income, losses, deductions and credits in any manner so long as the allocations have substantial economic effect.
An S-corp would only be superior, in my mind, if you wanted to open it up to investment to corporate entities and/or issues more than 1 class of stock. In virtually all other situations, the LLC would cover you up until the point you needed to reorganize as a full corporation.
Posted on 3/16/14 at 9:24 am to Poodlebrain
Poodle - Which is better for buying rental property with a partner?
I'm purchasing more rental houses with a partner and his income is substantially higher than mine. Is this going to be a mess during tax season?
I'm purchasing more rental houses with a partner and his income is substantially higher than mine. Is this going to be a mess during tax season?
Posted on 3/16/14 at 9:28 am to Poodlebrain
This is generally correct, but in certain industries, neither is preferable. For instance, I do some venture capital work, and they will not invest in LLCs and are generally prevented from investing in S corps. I've had to convert many LLCs to C corps to facilitate venture capital investments.
Posted on 3/16/14 at 10:40 am to I Love Bama
A lot of real estate investment projects form LP's.
Posted on 3/16/14 at 2:31 pm to I Love Bama
An LLC is almost always the better choice for owning real property. S-corps are not really good entities for owning real property. The issues are too many to go into on a message board.
Posted on 3/16/14 at 2:45 pm to Mo Jeaux
VC funds are concerned with the exit strategy for the investments they make. The goal for VC funds is for the companies it invests in to go public. This is the easiest, and generally most profitable, way for the VC fund to cash out of an investment. If the VC fund owns membership interests in LLCs, those interests often have to be sold at significant discounts due to lack of marketability and lack of control.
Posted on 3/17/14 at 12:06 pm to Poodlebrain
The one big benefit of an S Corp is the fact that the net income allocable to the shareholder is not subject to the self-employment tax. You do have to pay yourself a salary, which eats away at some of the benefits of an S Corp, but the savings can still be sizeable.
In exchange for the tax savings, you give up a lot of flexibility and non-tax benefits that are inherent in an LLC taxed as a partnership.
So, to answer your question, one would need to know more about the business you are in.
I'm guessing you must work with a lot of late-stage investors? The clients I've had in this area tend to be earlier in the pipeline, and almost all of them are LLCs taxed as partnerships, to allow the losses to specially allocate to the money partners. But they are generally bought out long before an IPO.
In exchange for the tax savings, you give up a lot of flexibility and non-tax benefits that are inherent in an LLC taxed as a partnership.
So, to answer your question, one would need to know more about the business you are in.
quote:
VC funds are concerned with the exit strategy for the investments they make. The goal for VC funds is for the companies it invests in to go public. This is the easiest, and generally most profitable, way for the VC fund to cash out of an investment. If the VC fund owns membership interests in LLCs, those interests often have to be sold at significant discounts due to lack of marketability and lack of control.
I'm guessing you must work with a lot of late-stage investors? The clients I've had in this area tend to be earlier in the pipeline, and almost all of them are LLCs taxed as partnerships, to allow the losses to specially allocate to the money partners. But they are generally bought out long before an IPO.
Posted on 3/17/14 at 10:30 pm to LSUFanHouston
If you take a step back and realize what the OP is probably trying to accomplish, I am with poodlebrain on this one. An LLC which elects to be treated as a partnership will provide greater flexibility and less administrative burden.
Posted on 3/18/14 at 3:15 pm to Poodlebrain
quote:
I think you have it backwards.
I think I did reverse that.
LLCs were relatively new back when I went to law school - the buzz was they would, effectively, replace S-corps over time, and certainly very few people recommend even starting an S-corp - except in very, very few, unique circumstances.
Existing S-corps - probably not worth the trouble to convert - but, without stats, I suspect the number of new organizations under LLC dwarfs S-corps.
This post was edited on 3/18/14 at 3:16 pm
Posted on 3/18/14 at 3:34 pm to Ace Midnight
S-corps can make a lot of sense for personal service businesses. You can achieve some permanent savings of self-employment taxes under the right circumstances.
Posted on 3/19/14 at 2:59 pm to Poodlebrain
quote:
S-corps can make a lot of sense for personal service businesses. You can achieve some permanent savings of self-employment taxes under the right circumstances.
This is where we see a lot of these. Single member LLCs electing S Corp status to take advantage of self-employment tax savings. It's a tricky area but if you are careful it can be a nice setup.
LLC's are not subject to Louisiana Franchise Tax. This includes LLC's that elect S Status. A state corporation, whether taxed as C Status or S Status, is subject to Franchise Tax.
I've actually had several state corporations - taxed as S - do a state conversion in the last couple of years to an LLC in order to save franchise tax. They are now a state LLC taxed as an S Corp.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News