Started By
Message

re: Barack Obama cracks down on for-profit colleges: Why do it this way?

Posted on 3/14/14 at 8:35 am to
Posted by MMauler
Member since Jun 2013
19216 posts
Posted on 3/14/14 at 8:35 am to
quote:

quote:
What the f*ck were they thinking ... the government, the girl and her mother?

FIFY

NYU was thinking intelligently. They aren't stiffed 100k in tuition. The morons are the girl, her mom, and the idiots in the government who gave her the loan in the first place.


I can understand these for-profit scam operations. THAT is what they are "in business" to do -- get as many people as possible to rack up massive amounts of debt so that they can get paid immediately.


But, a school like NYU should be thinking of its reputation. It's ostensibly not a racket, and it should take some pride in the careers of its students.

One solution could be to require these schools to be on the hook when a certain percent of their former students (graduates and non graduates) default on their student loans. This should have the effect of killing off the for-profit scams and leaving the "reputable" colleges to take a closer look at preparing and counseling their students properly.
Posted by BigJim
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
14513 posts
Posted on 3/14/14 at 8:38 am to
quote:

One solution could be to require these schools to be on the hook when a certain percent of their former students (graduates and non graduates) default on their student loans.


Didn't think you could default on student loans? At least not the federal ones (ie the ones that really matter).
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72170 posts
Posted on 3/14/14 at 8:40 am to
quote:

But, a school like NYU should be thinking of its reputation. It's ostensibly not a racket, and it should take some pride in the careers of its students.
I'm sure they do take pride in the careers of their students. Also, situations like this don't affect NYU's reputation, IMO. They did absolutely nothing wrong. They are simply thriving in an environment that is favorable to their current system.

What should they have done differently? Should NYU charge students more if they have a statistically higher paying major?

The thing is, people who choose these majors can't claim ignorance. We all know what the eventual financial output of certain careers are.
quote:

One solution could be to require these schools to be on the hook when a certain percent of their former students (graduates and non graduates) default on their student loans. This should have the effect of killing off the for-profit scams and leaving the "reputable" colleges to take a closer look at preparing and counseling their students properly.
You aren't thinking that position completely through, although I wouldn't mind the outcome of that situation.

What would actually happen is, these colleges would more than likely discard those majors which don't result in sufficient financial returns. As a business, it would be too risky to continue otherwise.

Why take the risk of offering a women's studies course if those who graduate in that field will more than likely be unable to pay for tuition? The risks outweigh the benefits.
This post was edited on 3/14/14 at 8:46 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram