Started By
Message

re: Regarding Lois Lerner's proclamation of innocence and the Fifth Amendment

Posted on 3/5/14 at 2:14 pm to
Posted by Decatur
Member since Mar 2007
28719 posts
Posted on 3/5/14 at 2:14 pm to
quote:

So you are saying Lerner is not in Contempt of Congress.


Contempt of Congress is based on a vote. It is not a legal determination made by a court.

Of course the Committee can vote to hold her in contempt. If they do and this goes to court, I imagine the court will give great weight to over 50 years of well-settled law. That's why I'm saying this path would be a waste of time and money. And another black eye for Issa.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124369 posts
Posted on 3/5/14 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

I imagine the court will give great weight to over 50 years of well-settled law.
Can you cite an instance in which a person proclaimed their innocence under oath of any crime, any breaking of rules, and indeed any wrongdoing at all, then immediately followed that testimony by invoking their right to avoid self-incrimination?

Any instance of such a contradiction in your file of supposedly "well-settled" cases?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram