- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Battlefield 4 vs COD Ghosts
Posted on 12/21/13 at 9:10 pm
Posted on 12/21/13 at 9:10 pm
I am sure this has been answered somewhere on this board, but which one is the best?
Posted on 12/21/13 at 9:15 pm to WhopperDawg
BF4 runs circles around Ghosts.
Posted on 12/21/13 at 9:17 pm to WhopperDawg
BF4 if you like strategic camping. COD if you want a more arcade run and gun style.
Posted on 12/21/13 at 10:00 pm to UltimateHog
quote:
BF4 runs circles around Ghosts.
Posted on 12/21/13 at 10:05 pm to RTR America
quote:
BF4 runs circles around Ghosts in a tank with HE shells and active protection in that bitch, while Ghosts are running around with their puppy dog killstreak.
There ya go
Posted on 12/21/13 at 10:24 pm to MadtownTiger
Ghosts is better if you wanna play with friends. BF4 is the better game and we were actually able to play with a squad of 4 but it was a little tricky. If you are lone wolf, BF4.
Posted on 12/21/13 at 10:38 pm to SaintEB
quote:
Ghosts is better if you wanna play with friends. BF4 is the better game and we were actually able to play with a squad of 4 but it was a little tricky. If you are lone wolf, BF4.
I think you got the two games completely backwards.
Posted on 12/22/13 at 7:52 am to WhopperDawg
Conquest on BF4 is the most fun I've ever had playing a game.
Posted on 12/22/13 at 8:04 am to Outlaw
Original Black Ops>>>>>>>>>BF4>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>COD Ghosts/BO2
Posted on 12/22/13 at 8:12 am to Drewbie
Swapping through my guns on BF > any COD
Posted on 12/22/13 at 8:21 am to Outlaw
Ghosts is actually a good game for multiplayer. Most will say it sucks but how many have actually played?
It's the most balanced in a long while.
It's the most balanced in a long while.
Posted on 12/22/13 at 8:28 am to The Eric
I rented it from redbox, and returned it after a day. It got very old fast.
Posted on 12/22/13 at 8:33 am to The Eric
quote:It's never been about the guns. It's the fact that every map pack since Black Ops 1 has sucked arse.
It's the most balanced in a long while.
Posted on 12/22/13 at 8:51 am to The Eric
In the end, all these opinions are just opinions.
These two games can easily separate two different kinds of play styles that people want to take part in.
COD=completely fast-paced quick-twitching type of shooter. Not aspect of vehicles, but you have to play to the killstreak factors.
BF4=a little slower unless playing in the close quarter buildings. More aspects to the game when you include the vehicles, cause if you have a team with a good jet pilot or group of tank guys, they can totally run that game easily.
I haven't really run into camping snipers too too much in BF4, which we all know is what COD players made the biggest stink about in BF games. But I imagine they stick mostly to the conquest games, I've been playing 100% rush and if you go into the mountains to snipe you easily get left behind by your team once they move up to the next base. BF4 levels are too massive and long range shots are getting harder and harder cause to make even a decent shot your probably rolling with a 20x hunter scope and having to lead way too much. BF4 is playing out of the snipers hands I feel by making the maps too large, which is normally the opposite, but with players being way to spastic while they are moving, the only potential targets long range camping snipers have are other camping long range snipers, which can only normally lead to 1-4 kills per game in rush.
These two games can easily separate two different kinds of play styles that people want to take part in.
COD=completely fast-paced quick-twitching type of shooter. Not aspect of vehicles, but you have to play to the killstreak factors.
BF4=a little slower unless playing in the close quarter buildings. More aspects to the game when you include the vehicles, cause if you have a team with a good jet pilot or group of tank guys, they can totally run that game easily.
I haven't really run into camping snipers too too much in BF4, which we all know is what COD players made the biggest stink about in BF games. But I imagine they stick mostly to the conquest games, I've been playing 100% rush and if you go into the mountains to snipe you easily get left behind by your team once they move up to the next base. BF4 levels are too massive and long range shots are getting harder and harder cause to make even a decent shot your probably rolling with a 20x hunter scope and having to lead way too much. BF4 is playing out of the snipers hands I feel by making the maps too large, which is normally the opposite, but with players being way to spastic while they are moving, the only potential targets long range camping snipers have are other camping long range snipers, which can only normally lead to 1-4 kills per game in rush.
Posted on 12/22/13 at 1:17 pm to The Eric
Ghosts is the second worst COD made.
I'm getting BF4 soon, hoping I enjoy it more than ghosts.
I'm getting BF4 soon, hoping I enjoy it more than ghosts.
Posted on 12/22/13 at 1:54 pm to WhopperDawg
Ghost and it's not close.
Posted on 12/22/13 at 1:57 pm to dansr731
quote:
Ghost and it's not close.
lulz
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News