Started By
Message
locked post

The shot by Gordon was fine

Posted on 11/26/13 at 9:33 pm
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
72233 posts
Posted on 11/26/13 at 9:33 pm
In basketball, the best thing you can do is find your open shots and, even then, it comes down to luck whether the ball goes in or not.

I do take issue with the fact that we decided to wait and run the play at the 10 second mark when we easily could've ran it earlier in the possession to atleast give us the opportunity to get a put back or foul GSW with some time still on the clock.

If the game were tied, obviously you want to wait for the last shot, but when you are trailing that late, you have to go for the lead as soon as possible and then handle the possible scenarios from there.

At least we looked so much better than last night, loss still hurts.
Posted by JayJay2
cane sweeeeeeet tea, Luzianne
Member since Jul 2010
15359 posts
Posted on 11/26/13 at 9:35 pm to
Nice post/thread.
Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
35048 posts
Posted on 11/26/13 at 9:36 pm to
All of this.

I approve of the shot, and I'm good with not taking a timeout.

Running the clock down was a silly, inexcusable decision.
Posted by CQQ
Member since Feb 2006
17048 posts
Posted on 11/26/13 at 9:36 pm to
Agreed, people that think the shot was bad are dumb as shite. This one hurt. Smith was frustrating the hell out of me. Refs were garbage.
Posted by MrBlue105
chillin with the BWC - anaconda
Member since Apr 2013
6602 posts
Posted on 11/26/13 at 9:39 pm to
Would have been a good shot to take with 10 seconds left. Thatway, you can foul curry and if he hits both, you can still tie it with one 3.

If I'm gordon there, I drive the lane and jump and go for the layup/foul
This post was edited on 11/26/13 at 9:44 pm
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
35718 posts
Posted on 11/26/13 at 9:40 pm to
Agreed.


It was a pretty good play. AD had 3 people swarming him on the roll and eg was wide fricking open. Can't complain about that.
Posted by corndeaux
Member since Sep 2009
9634 posts
Posted on 11/26/13 at 9:41 pm to
This is silly. Results over process.

They worked a good shot. If he hits it, this post turns into "Great coaching to wait for the last shot so Curry has no time left." If they had gone early and he makes it "Fire Monty. They went too early and Curry had enough time to get off a shot to win." Or if they rush a shot and they miss "Fire Monty. Why did they rush the shot?"

Both taking a quick shot or waiting for the last one are valid strategies here. It's not an either/or proposition. The critique is only because he missed and they lost.
This post was edited on 11/26/13 at 9:46 pm
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32954 posts
Posted on 11/26/13 at 10:03 pm to
I agree, it was a great look. I would rather Ryno taking a three at the end of the game, but it was still a good shot.
Posted by hendersonshands
Univ. of Louisiana Ragin Cajuns
Member since Oct 2007
160118 posts
Posted on 11/26/13 at 10:55 pm to
A corner three is not a bad shot at all. I'm not upset with that final possession. I am, however, upset at the constant high screens with only Smiht and Davis setting them and Smiht shooting 15 times.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram