- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Another horrid ejection in Cal-NW
Posted on 9/1/13 at 12:45 am
Posted on 9/1/13 at 12:45 am
It's going to frick up a big game or two this year.
Posted on 9/1/13 at 12:46 am to tylercsbn9
Absolutely terrible. Hopefully replay reverses this...
Posted on 9/1/13 at 12:47 am to bags03
And not only do the miss this one, they miss half the next one.
Just terrible NCAA
Just terrible NCAA
This post was edited on 9/1/13 at 12:48 am
Posted on 9/1/13 at 12:47 am to bags03
And it's confirmed
He hit chest to chest.
He hit chest to chest.
Posted on 9/1/13 at 12:48 am to bags03
Replay will never reverse this bullshite
Posted on 9/1/13 at 12:48 am to bags03
That was bad, I mean that was borderline a flag let alone an ejection. This is really going to shape a big game.
Posted on 9/1/13 at 1:07 am to reb13
These announcers are a joke. Looking for an ejection on every play.
Offsides...might be an ejection!
Offsides...might be an ejection!
Posted on 9/2/13 at 11:11 pm to tylercsbn9
FYI, the Pac-12 reversed this penalty and half-game ban, saying McCain should not have been ejected.
https://www.mercurynews.com/california/ci_24001070/pac-12-rescinds-targeting-ban-cals-mccain
The fishy thing is, they stopped the game to do an official review, and they said "after further review, the ruling on the field is confirmed." So it sounds like they lied because the replay equipment failed. And we lost our best pass rusher for most of the 4th Qtr. The game was tied 27-27 at that point.
It was a textbook tackle.
https://www.mercurynews.com/california/ci_24001070/pac-12-rescinds-targeting-ban-cals-mccain
quote:
BERKELEY, Calif.—The Pac-12 has ruled that California defensive end Chris McCain should not be suspended for the first half this week because a failure of the instant replay process led to his incorrect ejection. McCain was ejected in the fourth quarter Saturday against No. 22 Northwestern for targeting. Because the penalty came in the second half, McCain was supposed to miss the first half of the upcoming game against Portland State. But the Pac-12 said Monday that because of a technical failure of the replay process the play was never reviewed. Ejections for targeting that are confirmed by replay are not reviewable after the game by the conference. But because this play was not reviewed in the game, the Pac-12 was allowed to look at the play and determined McCain should not have been ejected.
The fishy thing is, they stopped the game to do an official review, and they said "after further review, the ruling on the field is confirmed." So it sounds like they lied because the replay equipment failed. And we lost our best pass rusher for most of the 4th Qtr. The game was tied 27-27 at that point.
It was a textbook tackle.
This post was edited on 9/2/13 at 11:20 pm
Posted on 9/2/13 at 11:38 pm to TouchedTheAxeIn82
Then two pick 6's by Collin Ellis won the game. But all in all horrible call.
This post was edited on 9/2/13 at 11:40 pm
Posted on 9/3/13 at 12:16 am to TouchedTheAxeIn82
Glad they reversed the call.
Posted on 9/3/13 at 2:10 am to TouchedTheAxeIn82
Good to see the conference do the right thing after-the-fact. It's still a sham that this effected the game.
On College Football Final, Rece Davis said it was a definite target and that he deserved the ejection. The people in the media can't even get this rule correct with the benefits of multiple replay angles and the refs are expected to get this correct in live gameplay?
On College Football Final, Rece Davis said it was a definite target and that he deserved the ejection. The people in the media can't even get this rule correct with the benefits of multiple replay angles and the refs are expected to get this correct in live gameplay?
Posted on 9/3/13 at 2:42 am to bags03
Announcers were pathetic....
they wanted to call head to head targeting on a running play.
"looked like that was head to head too."
and then went confusing retard.
"but I guess that's different...the Cal defender was targeting b/c he didn't have to tackle the QB who was looking to throw and not a runner."
they wanted to call head to head targeting on a running play.
"looked like that was head to head too."
and then went confusing retard.
"but I guess that's different...the Cal defender was targeting b/c he didn't have to tackle the QB who was looking to throw and not a runner."
Posted on 9/3/13 at 4:34 am to Zamoro10
It's going to be like the game where Wing lost his TD due to a new rule.
It will happen to LSU.
It will happen to LSU.
Posted on 9/3/13 at 8:14 am to TouchedTheAxeIn82
quote:
they stopped the game to do an official review, and they said "after further review, the ruling on the field is confirmed." So it sounds like they lied because the replay equipment failed.
was watching the game, that was some BS on the ref's part
Posted on 9/3/13 at 8:18 am to tylercsbn9
Officials are far too incompetent to be given the authority to eject a player for a hard tackle. It will definitely effect the outcome of a few games this year. Especially when a great defensive player gets ejected in the second half of a game and must sit half of next week's top 10 matchup.
Posted on 9/3/13 at 8:22 am to Choupique19
quote:
. Especially when a great defensive player gets ejected in the second half of a game and must sit half of next week's top 10 matchup
Could you imagine Clowney getting ejected against some directional school in the third quarter then having to miss the first half of a game against someone like UF?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News