Started By
Message

re: Deondre Clark and McDowell interested in Ole Miss??

Posted on 7/23/13 at 9:36 pm to
Posted by DMagic
#ChowderPosse
Member since Aug 2010
46496 posts
Posted on 7/23/13 at 9:36 pm to
quote:

Houston Nutt couldn't recruit for shite



I agree.


quote:

Not anywhere close to what Ole Miss is doing right now in recruiting.



No shite


quote:

Nutt was one of the laziest SOBs when it came to recruiting.



Agreed.
Posted by deuce985
Member since Feb 2008
27660 posts
Posted on 7/23/13 at 9:38 pm to
So what's Freeze selling these guys? Because it's not tradition, academics or 5 win seasons. Must be throwing that Grove putang through their windows.
Posted by DMagic
#ChowderPosse
Member since Aug 2010
46496 posts
Posted on 7/23/13 at 9:44 pm to
quote:

So what's Freeze selling these guys?




Have you ever heard the man speak? Have you ever been to Oxford? Are you still a virgin?


quote:

Because it's not tradition, academics or 5 win seasons



Blatant flame that doesn't make sense because Freeze won 7 games in his first season.


quote:

Must be throwing that Grove putang through their windows.



Well that would be stupid because the girl would be physically injured


Posted by dreaux
baton rouge
Member since Oct 2006
40881 posts
Posted on 7/23/13 at 9:45 pm to
quote:

Doubting what exactly? You don't think that inexperience will be a key factor in how well your defense plays?


Where is this inexperience exactly since you follow lsu so closely.

Loston/ Martin/mills/jallen will be lockdown. We got the number 1 CB last year. I'm sure he'll do fine in Nickle and dime. Not to mention Thompson and Thomas .

Kwon was arguably out best lber last year. Barrow was second in tackles on the team. We are filthy on the third position, but since we play Nickle so much, it doesn't really matter. Johnson and ego might be the best DT tandem in the sec...with Thomas, mick for depth along with a slew of beast we signed last year.

Rasco and Danielle could possibly be better then mingo/Montgomery. Rasco will be better then Montgomery that is a fact. Danielle is a bigger version of mingo. Maybe just a step slower, but big enough to draw double teams.

There will be like 6 five stars on our starting D since you're such a stargazer. Not to mention...Herron, Allen, lacatour, bower, beckwith, Bain, Gilmore, Neal.

Just filthy.

Where is this weakness you speak of oh wise one. Do tell. I'm all ears.
This post was edited on 7/23/13 at 9:48 pm
Posted by Memphis
Fenway Park
Member since Jun 2013
6302 posts
Posted on 7/23/13 at 9:48 pm to
quote:

Well that would be stupid because the girl would be physically injured

I actually lol'd
Posted by Sneakbo
Member since Jul 2013
917 posts
Posted on 7/23/13 at 9:48 pm to

LSU doesn't need to use money.

We are a winning program. OM isn't

DWI
Posted by DMagic
#ChowderPosse
Member since Aug 2010
46496 posts
Posted on 7/23/13 at 9:49 pm to
What the frick are you talking about? You didn't lose STARTING PLAYERS?


quote:

Where is this weakness you speak of oh wise one. Do tell. I'm all ears



Please by all means link where I said that LSU would be bad or had weaknesses. Do tell. Stop being a vagina. You have new starters. shite will happen then when they gel they'll be as good as anyone in the country. SO CONTROVERSIAL
Posted by DMagic
#ChowderPosse
Member since Aug 2010
46496 posts
Posted on 7/23/13 at 9:49 pm to
quote:

LSU doesn't need to use money.




Motherfricking lulz
Posted by dreaux
baton rouge
Member since Oct 2006
40881 posts
Posted on 7/23/13 at 9:58 pm to
quote:

What the frick are you talking about? You didn't lose STARTING PLAYERS?


Yes. As do all other teams. I am simply pointing out that the loss of starters affecting the performance of our defense are overblown and exaggerated. Alabama and Georgia lost as many, but they get a pass right? Yet we played more freshmen then anyone.

Further, the starting 11 aren't nearly as inexperienced as you think they are. Every single one except maybe Danielle has had meaning snaps, but has passed up the projected starter (Allen) due to his performance in spring and summer.

Further, it's much easier for a defense to rebuild then an offense. The defense is always ahead of the offense. And we have the best coaches on defense in the country. I am simply saying, there will be little drop off if any. Might even be better. National analyst are really underrating LSU this year, but part of that is due to the shitastic schedule we are dealt.

Reid, Montgomery, Simon did not play up to their sophomore seasons. And frankly were a disappointment. The only real loss was Kevin Minter. But we good at Lber. I could go on.

And don't take this the wrong way. I actually like you. And I hate ole miss with a passion.
Posted by DMagic
#ChowderPosse
Member since Aug 2010
46496 posts
Posted on 7/23/13 at 10:02 pm to
quote:

Alabama and Georgia lost as many, but they get a pass right?




Uh no. I think UGA is in big trouble. Y'all and Bama will be better than them.

quote:

Further, it's much easier for a defense to rebuild then an offense. The defense is always ahead of the offense


I concur

quote:

And we have the best coaches on defense in the country


That is certainly debatable

quote:

And don't take this the wrong way. I actually like you. And I hate ole miss with a passion.



No offense taken. I hate LSU but I'm not stupid.
Posted by dreaux
baton rouge
Member since Oct 2006
40881 posts
Posted on 7/23/13 at 10:05 pm to
I have nothing against you?

We most certainly have one of the best...certainly top 5 defensive coaching staffs in the country. Is that better?
This post was edited on 7/23/13 at 10:06 pm
Posted by BayouBengal0505
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2013
2686 posts
Posted on 7/23/13 at 10:57 pm to
I forgot, Ole Miss just puts players in the NFL left and right... No offense but for many of these kids that is all they care about.
Posted by JakeFromStateFarm
*wears khakis
Member since Jun 2012
11949 posts
Posted on 7/24/13 at 12:22 am to
We'll likely end up still getting Willis and Godchaux. Let Clark and McDowell be intrested in Ole Miss.
Posted by UMRealist
Member since Feb 2013
35360 posts
Posted on 7/24/13 at 1:01 am to
Posted by Bernie Moore
Member since May 2010
1859 posts
Posted on 7/24/13 at 2:22 am to
quote:

Houston Nutt couldn't recruit for shite. Not anywhere close to what Ole Miss is doing right now in recruiting. Nutt was one of the laziest SOBs when it came to recruiting.


quote:

deuce985


You sound like a band geek!
Posted by LSUNV
In the woods or on the water
Member since Feb 2011
22426 posts
Posted on 7/24/13 at 2:25 am to
Dammit Real! I just spewed shite everywhere

This post was edited on 7/24/13 at 2:26 am
Posted by BobBarker
Bompton
Member since Nov 2012
11661 posts
Posted on 7/24/13 at 6:22 am to
quote:

We'll likely end up still getting Willis and Godchaux. Let Clark and McDowell be intrested in Ole Miss.


Uh, no. We need d-lineman. We need them all. And besides you don't concede a recruit because he's shown interest in another school.
Posted by Ironhead985
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2013
8770 posts
Posted on 7/24/13 at 6:47 am to
quote:

Uh, no. We need d-lineman. We need them all. And besides you don't concede a recruit because he's shown interest in another school.
This. I'm sure glad that some of the posters on this board aren't charged with actually recruiting these kids.
Posted by Cadello
Eunice
Member since Dec 2007
47819 posts
Posted on 7/24/13 at 6:47 am to
quote:

Until you or anyone else can show proof they're paying players, let's not use that as an excuse here.

Yes I agree...This isn't Auburn after all...
Posted by Cadello
Eunice
Member since Dec 2007
47819 posts
Posted on 7/24/13 at 6:51 am to
quote:

. I hate LSU
Apparent

quote:

I'm not stupid.

Not apparent

You are arguing with LSU fans on the LSU RB for what reason I'm still not sure.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram