This cyclical talk is bs. UT had a good run in the 90s but are nowhere near florida as a program and the SEC/bama knows it. Even when UT was at their best in teh 90s, florida was better.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Tiger Live2

Westwego, LA

Member since Mar 2012

9605 posts

Posted on 5/24/13 at 2:20 pm to Smoke Dinardo

I know it would never happen, and UGA, UF, and USC would bitch to high hell if it was mentioned. But 6-2-2. 10 game conference schedule. No one gets an advantage of uneven home and away games, unless teams agree to a nuetral site(which is their choice)

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by noonan

Nassau Bay, TX

Member since Aug 2005

36905 posts

Posted on 5/24/13 at 2:20 pm to Smoke Dinardo

I would prefer 6-0-3 but would be okay with 6-1-2. At least make it 6-0-2 for the 10 teams that don't care about a permanent cross division opponent.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by BoobieWatcher

Member since Jun 2010

4587 posts

Posted on 5/24/13 at 2:23 pm to Smoke Dinardo

How about we just move Alabama and Auburn to the East and bring Missouri and Kentucky to the West. All Problems solved.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by EvrybodysAllAmerican

Member since Apr 2013

11201 posts

Posted on 5/24/13 at 2:26 pm to BoobieWatcher

quote:
How about we just move Alabama and Auburn to the East and bring Missouri and Kentucky to the West. All Problems solved.

I like it! Since its all about tradition, and not scheduling advantages, right?

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by GeauxTigerTM

Member since Sep 2006

30596 posts

Posted on 5/24/13 at 3:15 pm to Smoke Dinardo

The answer is 6-0-3.

If there are teams that simply MUST play each other every year, than they can petition to restructure the conference to make sure they're all bunched up together Tokyo subway style in the same division...or they can schedule them as an OOC game that would not count towards their SEC record.

Anything else caters to Tuscaloosa...and frick them.

Page 1 2