Started By
Message

re: Discussion: Top 200 Movies We Agree Don't Suck - 2.0

Posted on 3/1/13 at 11:26 am to
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37530 posts
Posted on 3/1/13 at 11:26 am to
quote:

Wow, you adopted my Trois Coleurs exception rule. Sweet!


You know, I want to make the Godfather folks accept Godfather 1-3. You just can't leave off a film in the trilogy and get the two best ones, that's crazy.
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 3/1/13 at 11:29 am to
I think you can since the third was made almost 20 years after the first two. It was a cash grab. Actually, it was a prestige grab, given Coppola's career since 1980. Has any director done more to harm his reputation than Coppola? I mean, we forgive Polanski for being a horrible person, but Coppola just started making bad movies.
Posted by etm512
Mandeville, LA
Member since Aug 2005
20777 posts
Posted on 3/1/13 at 11:31 am to
I might be able to string a few incoherent sentences together for you
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59193 posts
Posted on 3/1/13 at 11:32 am to
quote:

You know, I want to make the Godfather folks accept Godfather 1-3. You just can't leave off a film in the trilogy and get the two best ones, that's crazy.


I don't hate GF III the way a lot of folks do, but I'll disagree because it came out 16 years later so it was not made in combo with the other 2 in the same way that LOTR and Kill Bill were basically filmed as 1. Parts of GF I and II over lap and basically overlap and continue the same story, but are split into 2 films for time considerations.

The Godfather Saga (parts I and II edited together) predated GF III by many years.
This post was edited on 3/1/13 at 11:33 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram