- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: We have to win sooner than we think...
Posted on 2/2/13 at 10:07 am to Broski
Posted on 2/2/13 at 10:07 am to Broski
if the OKC model (which is what most people talk about on here) is the one being followed...the thunder went 23-59 their first year in OKC...followed by a 30-52 year...then they flipped to a 52-30 year in their third season.
if that happened, i'd shite my pants
if that happened, i'd shite my pants
3
Posted on 2/2/13 at 10:09 am to quail man
OKC didn't have one of their best players with a max player option to put the pressure on them though.
Posted on 2/2/13 at 10:12 am to quail man
quote:
if the OKC model (which is what most people talk about on here) is the one being followed...the thunder went 23-59 their first year in OKC...followed by a 30-52 year...then they flipped to a 52-30 year in their third season. if that happened, i'd shite my pants
We probably would've finished at .500 this year if we stayed healthy.
I think we win 45-50 next year if we add another piece and some depth. That also includes AD and AR improving.
Posted on 2/2/13 at 4:31 pm to quail man
The OKC "model" has worked for them, but they were very fortunate with the draft picks they had and the way they fell. Note, btw, that keeping that group together isn't easy. That "model" is not the only way to build a contender (small market or not).
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News