- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Agree or disagree with Steve Carrell on returning as Michael Scott?
Posted on 1/26/13 at 1:33 pm to Tactical1
Posted on 1/26/13 at 1:33 pm to Tactical1
I thought they missed the best opportunity to reintroduce him when David Wallace was buying Dunder Mifflin. They could've referenced Michael being an investor which would open the door for him to make a cameo in any number of ways. Obviously he couldn't be a huge investor because we all know that he sucks with money, so he wouldn't be necessary to any storlyine. But they could've opened it up where David let Michael $5,000 or something, if just for a symbolic ownership. I think it would've been a huge triumph for a character who had given so much of his life to this business to then be an owner of it.
1
Posted on 1/26/13 at 1:37 pm to funnystuff
Why would he return?
Now, maybe if they did a reunion show where the entire staff goes to the premier of the documentary, that would be a reason for him to come back. However, just because the filming of the doc is wrapping up is not a reason for him to return.
Now, maybe if they did a reunion show where the entire staff goes to the premier of the documentary, that would be a reason for him to come back. However, just because the filming of the doc is wrapping up is not a reason for him to return.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News