- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Worse Officiating: Seahawks vs Packers or Braves vs Cardinals?
Posted on 1/18/13 at 3:09 pm
Posted on 1/18/13 at 3:09 pm
Both were awful the Seattle-Green Bay directly affected the ending while the Braves-Cards was a playoff game
Posted on 1/18/13 at 3:29 pm to dawgfan24348
quote:
Seattle-Green Bay
Posted on 1/18/13 at 3:31 pm to dawgfan24348
Probably the Seahawks game, but the Braves got fricked in the playoffs
Posted on 1/18/13 at 3:32 pm to dawgfan24348
quote:
Worse Officiating: Seahawks vs Packers or Braves vs Cardinals or Tennessee vs Kentucky?
This post was edited on 1/18/13 at 3:32 pm
Posted on 1/18/13 at 3:32 pm to dawgfan24348
braves vs cards wasnt even that bad, not mention them not having the benifit of replay. im assuming you think it was a terrible call because you are a braves fan
Posted on 1/18/13 at 3:33 pm to dawgfan24348
Seahawks--Packers
You could make the argument that it was a legit infield fly if you go by the rulebook. Though there was no excuse for them making the call so late
You could make the argument that it was a legit infield fly if you go by the rulebook. Though there was no excuse for them making the call so late
Posted on 1/18/13 at 3:34 pm to redfieldk717
It was a terrible call because the ball landed 250 feet from home.
Posted on 1/18/13 at 3:35 pm to JJ27
quote:
It was a terrible call because the ball landed 250 feet from home.
+1
A ball hit to the outfield, by definition, isn't an in-field fly.
Posted on 1/18/13 at 3:36 pm to JJ27
quote:
It was a terrible call because the ball landed 250 feet from home.
not even close to 250, not saying it was a good call but not near as bad as the packers game
Posted on 1/18/13 at 3:39 pm to TheFranchise
quote:
A ball hit to the outfield, by definition, isn't an in-field fly.
that is not the definition
Posted on 1/18/13 at 3:41 pm to redfieldk717
quote:
that is not the definition
This. The only part about that play that was wrong was that he called it late.
Posted on 1/18/13 at 3:42 pm to Tigerfan7218
It was not an ordinary effort.
Posted on 1/18/13 at 3:44 pm to volfan30
quote:
It was not an ordinary effort.
it would have been, had there not been a miscommunication with the outfielder...again, i disagree with the timing in which the ump called it but its not even close to the terrible call against the pack
Posted on 1/18/13 at 3:44 pm to volfan30
As a former umpire (highschool) it was a bad call compounded by the fact it was late.
And yes, I am a Braves fan.
Edit:
And yes, I am a Braves fan.
Edit:
This post was edited on 1/18/13 at 3:47 pm
Posted on 1/18/13 at 3:51 pm to volfan30
Debatable, I mean the SS stops moving way before the ball hit the ground so he was there in plenty of time. The fact that it's even debatable makes it not nearly as bad as the Seattle call.
Posted on 1/18/13 at 3:54 pm to Tigerfan7218
quote:
the SS stops moving way before
Way before?
I am thinking slightly before.
But I do think the replacements were worse.
Posted on 1/18/13 at 4:07 pm to retooc
Yea way before is probably a bit extreme. But the point was, it's not like it would have been a spectacular running catch or anything. He was definitely underneath it in plenty of time
Posted on 1/18/13 at 4:15 pm to redfieldk717
I don't know if that is ordinary effort or not, but a ball hit that far into the outfield is never ruled an infield fly rule. The umpires have to use commonsense.
This post was edited on 1/18/13 at 4:16 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News