- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Next: Top 200 MWADS March 2013
Posted on 1/14/13 at 9:01 pm to Tiger1242
Posted on 1/14/13 at 9:01 pm to Tiger1242
quote:
How does this work exactly? I'd be interested in doing this but I dk what kind of quality writing I could do for 40 movies
It's simple. You post a ballot of Top xx movies (probably 40) when asked. Nothing else to voting. I want as many people as possible to vote.
Optionally, you can offer to write a few paragraph/summary/reaction/reflection to somewhere between 1 and 3 films. I would never ask anyone to write 40 of them. Except Baloo and probably have written that many over the years. See the 1970s sticky thread for examples.
It's not really hard at all.
Now the Point/Counterpoint is new, so yeah, that could be interesting.
Posted on 1/14/13 at 9:09 pm to Freauxzen
quote:
Any other answers to the questions?
Trilogies. Can they be one entry, or do I have to mention them multiple times?
Posted on 1/14/13 at 9:18 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Trilogies. Can they be one entry, or do I have to mention them multiple times?
I can never get everyone to follow the same rule, so the new rule will be:
1) Do whatever you feel is right. If A Movie is Better/worse than others because of a trilogy, rank it as such.
2) If you really believe the movie stands alone, rank it as such.
3) The HIGHEST rated film of a trilogy or series will have the annotation /(Trilogy/Series) Attached, making sure that people know as a whole they rated at this point. But it will not deter overall rankings.
If this happens in the Top 10, then the writer/blurb will get special attention.
Posted on 1/14/13 at 9:24 pm to Freauxzen
quote:
2) If you really believe the movie stands alone, rank it as such.
So then Star Wars and The Empire Strikes Back shall be separate (Return of the Jedi is hardly top 40 material), while The Lord of the Rings shall be one then.
Posted on 1/15/13 at 4:21 pm to Flair Chops
When are y'all planning to do this?
Only reason I ask is because the 70s one JUST finished up, so jumping right into another one seems like overkill IMO. Might wanna wait a while.
Of course, that's just a friendly suggestion. Feel free to ignore it if y'all think I'm wrong.
Only reason I ask is because the 70s one JUST finished up, so jumping right into another one seems like overkill IMO. Might wanna wait a while.
Of course, that's just a friendly suggestion. Feel free to ignore it if y'all think I'm wrong.
Posted on 1/15/13 at 4:24 pm to CocomoLSU
i think we do need a small break before starting next one.
coke, you need to go vote in the movie board logo voting thread
coke, you need to go vote in the movie board logo voting thread
Posted on 1/18/13 at 6:41 pm to CocomoLSU
quote:
When are y'all planning to do this?
Only reason I ask is because the 70s one JUST finished up, so jumping right into another one seems like overkill IMO. Might wanna wait a while.
Of course, that's just a friendly suggestion. Feel free to ignore it if y'all think I'm wrong.
Nope, not ignoring at all. I'm planning to wait about 4 weeks or so.
I just want to get the specifics down and people thinking about it.
Bump for more suggestions.
Posted on 2/15/13 at 10:10 am to Freauxzen
Everyone comfortable starting sometime over the next 2 weeks?
Posted on 2/15/13 at 10:16 am to Freauxzen
quote:
1. Ballot Size Vote (25,30,35,40,50, >50)
50 is good
quote:
2. Writer Declaraton (Yes I want homewor.I meant to write)
Absolutely
quote:
3. Point/Counterpoint Offer (must be willing to write about the Top 5 whether you like the film or not)
Of course, I'll take the pro Woody Allen position
quote:
4. JGL connection?
Probably not
This post was edited on 2/15/13 at 10:50 am
Posted on 2/15/13 at 10:18 am to Freauxzen
quote:
Everyone comfortable starting sometime over the next 2 weeks?
Why don't we just start now?
Posted on 2/15/13 at 10:23 am to Freauxzen
I must've missed youre response to me last month. 4 weeks?
How often do ya'll plan on cranking these things out? Seems like one (laybe two) a year at most.
Also, can you post a list of all the lists done so far?
How often do ya'll plan on cranking these things out? Seems like one (laybe two) a year at most.
Also, can you post a list of all the lists done so far?
Posted on 2/15/13 at 10:27 am to CocomoLSU
quote:
I must've missed youre response to me last month. 4 weeks?
Yeah, almost to the day. I'm usually not so punctual.
quote:
How often do ya'll plan on cranking these things out? Seems like one (laybe two) a year at most.
They generate good discussion and good post counts. Last year was only two, two years ago I think we did 4.
I think 2-4 is fair. I'll probably hit three this year. This one. 60s in the Mid-Summer then something in the Fall/Late-Fall (Sports and/or Actors)
You agree?
quote:
Also, can you post a list of all the lists done so far?
Top 100 Movies We Agree Don't Suck (Now Version 1)
Top 50 Science Fiction
Top 50 Comedy
Top 50 Directors
Top 100 Movies 2000s
Top 100 Movies 1990s
Top 100 Movies 1980s
Top 50 Movies 1970s
This post was edited on 2/15/13 at 10:28 am
Posted on 2/15/13 at 10:31 am to Freauxzen
This is what the full schedule looks like:
1960s
Actors
Sports Films
Heroes and Villains
1950s
1940s
Foreign Films
Horror Films
Animated (Non-Live Actor)
1930s
Scripts
Cinematography
Ensemble
Top 100 Round 3
Probably a good 5 year outlook. I am taking other ideas
1960s
Actors
Sports Films
Heroes and Villains
1950s
1940s
Foreign Films
Horror Films
Animated (Non-Live Actor)
1930s
Scripts
Cinematography
Ensemble
Top 100 Round 3
Probably a good 5 year outlook. I am taking other ideas
This post was edited on 2/15/13 at 10:33 am
Posted on 2/15/13 at 10:51 am to Freauxzen
I think 40s and 30s will be more or less a moot point.
Posted on 2/15/13 at 10:52 am to Freauxzen
quote:
Heroes and Villains
This could be good for discussion, I know we don't all agree on the defination of villain.
Posted on 2/15/13 at 10:52 am to OMLandshark
quote:
I think 40s and 30s will be more or less a moot point.
I think we could do one list for pre 1950
Posted on 2/15/13 at 10:53 am to H-Town Tiger
quote:
This could be good for discussion, I know we don't all agree on the defination of villain.
Yeah, I don't really think that Hannibal Lector (at least from Silence of the Lambs), is a villain. He has a villainous nature to be sure, but he's not the antagonist of the story.
Posted on 2/15/13 at 10:53 am to H-Town Tiger
quote:
I think we could do one list for pre 1950
Good idea
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News