- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Argo - Rated R
Posted on 10/21/12 at 3:54 pm
Posted on 10/21/12 at 3:54 pm
Why was it rated R?
I've seen more violence in a cartoon on TV. Yes they showed a few people getting killed but I honestly don't see how that wasn't PG. PG-13 at the worst.
I've seen more violence in a cartoon on TV. Yes they showed a few people getting killed but I honestly don't see how that wasn't PG. PG-13 at the worst.
7
Posted on 10/21/12 at 4:00 pm to TigerMyth36
R movies have more street cred come Oscar time.
Posted on 10/21/12 at 4:01 pm to Cosmo
Normally the studio breaks its back to get below an R. You just about have to be right because I really can't see any reason it got an R.
Posted on 10/21/12 at 4:03 pm to TigerMyth36
I actually said this as we left the movie the other night.
It had some cuss words but really no reason it needed to be R.
It had some cuss words but really no reason it needed to be R.
Posted on 10/21/12 at 4:05 pm to hiltacular
Maybe the MPAA Narcs didn't like the excessive cigarette smoking. 
It must freak young people out to see ashtrays full of cigs on desks in an office.
It must freak young people out to see ashtrays full of cigs on desks in an office.
Posted on 10/21/12 at 4:06 pm to hiltacular
It may well have gotten the rating under 'disturbing imagery' provisions; someone hanging from a cherry picker in the streets of Tehran, the firing squad footage, the dude getting shot in the street near the Ambassador's residence, etc.
Posted on 10/21/12 at 4:26 pm to BoardReader
Argo frick yourself. That's why.
Posted on 10/21/12 at 4:35 pm to BoardReader
quote:I've seen worse than that in PG.
It may well have gotten the rating under 'disturbing imagery' provisions; someone hanging from a cherry picker in the streets of Tehran, the firing squad footage, the dude getting shot in the street near the Ambassador's residence, etc.
Posted on 10/21/12 at 5:01 pm to TigerMyth36
I think it was mainly due to portraying the hanging people.
Also I think there is limit on how many times you can say frick in a movie before it is automatically rated R
Also I think there is limit on how many times you can say frick in a movie before it is automatically rated R
Posted on 10/21/12 at 5:04 pm to ctalati32
quote:
Also I think there is limit on how many times you can say frick in a movie before it is automatically rated R
that's a myth. same with nudity
16 candles has both
this thread reminds me of the original texas chainsaw massacre. i always wonder what it would be rated if released today
Posted on 10/21/12 at 5:10 pm to TigerMyth36
This film is not yet rated explains this. There is no explanation
Posted on 10/22/12 at 8:24 am to TigerMyth36
quote:
Why was it rated R?
"Rated R for language and some violent images"
LINK
Has to mostly be the profanity, there was a good bit of it throughout the movie, especially when the CIA guys would yell at each other.
Posted on 10/22/12 at 8:30 am to LSUBoo
Probably because of the wood chipper scene. William Macy was great in this movie.
Yes, I know.
Yes, I know.
Posted on 10/22/12 at 8:34 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
16 candles has both
Wasn't that before the PG-13 rating existed though ?
Posted on 10/22/12 at 8:41 am to BoardReader
quote:
t may well have gotten the rating under 'disturbing imagery' provisions; someone hanging from a cherry picker in the streets of Tehran, the firing squad footage, the dude getting shot in the street near the Ambassador's residence, etc.
This might be true. You never know what really irks the morality squad doing the rating.
Listening to the commentary on the True Romance DVD, it almost got an X-rating for the violent scene where Gandolfini and Alabama bloody battle it out in the hotel room...specifically they objected to when she blows him away and raises the shotgun over her head in "primal screams" and acts "too animalistic" and starts beating his dead body with the gun.
They thought it was shocking.
Posted on 10/22/12 at 8:44 am to TigerMyth36
Is it worth seeing? Can't make up my mind, but want to go to the movies sometime soon.
Posted on 10/22/12 at 8:45 am to MaggieMay
quote:
Is it worth seeing? Can't make up my mind, but want to go to the movies sometime soon.
Yes, it's worth seeing. I really enjoyed it.
Posted on 10/22/12 at 8:46 am to TigerMyth36
quote:
Why was it rated R?
it might have something to do with all the fbombs being thrown around
Posted on 10/22/12 at 8:50 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:The King's Speech was rated R and the ONLY reason was because he said frick like 20 times in a row in one scene.
quote:
Also I think there is limit on how many times you can say frick in a movie before it is automatically rated R
that's a myth.
quote:This is my opinion.
R movies have more street cred come Oscar time.
This post was edited on 10/22/12 at 8:51 am
Posted on 10/22/12 at 9:01 am to TigerMyth36
quote:
Why was it rated R?
I've seen more violence in a cartoon on TV. Yes they showed a few people getting killed but I honestly don't see how that wasn't PG. PG-13 at the worst.
I kinda felt the same way about Looper. Saw no reason they should have made it R. I love titties in a film as much as the next guy, but it felt like a PG-13 movie at its core. Can't believe I'm saying this since I want as many films to be R-rated as possible.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News