Started By
Message
locked post

No sacks against Idaho? Not ONE?

Posted on 9/17/12 at 6:13 am
Posted by M. Physema
Member since Sep 2012
92 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 6:13 am
Just saw this in some article (I think on CFN). True story?
Posted by Papa Tigah
TIGER ISLAND, LA
Member since Sep 2007
18576 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 6:18 am to
say it isn't true joe.
Posted by Prominentwon
LSU, McNeese St. Fan
Member since Jan 2005
93801 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 6:20 am to
63-14. Sorry they didn't get enough practice in for you.
Posted by DBeaux225
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2012
9510 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 6:22 am to
Idaho's qb had 3 step drops and released the ball quick
all night. It's hard to get sacks like that. Expect to see
that from everybody we play this year.
Posted by DrD
Houston
Member since Jan 2010
2622 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 6:24 am to
We must have been doing something right - count the interceptions!
Posted by Lonnie4LSU
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2008
9525 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 6:54 am to
You didn't watch the game, did you.

Posted by manwich
You've wanted my
Member since Oct 2008
52606 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 6:55 am to
quote:

No sacks against Idaho
as predicted
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
43369 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 6:59 am to
Its a valid question/comment. We didnt blitz much (I dont think)... and they threw quick passes mostly to wide open receivers sitting in the flats.
Posted by Football_Freak
Member since May 2012
2410 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 7:12 am to
didn't need any. quick pass strategy worked to avoid sacks, but did not work to stop the Tigers. Simple as that.
Posted by KT70
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2011
1272 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 7:30 am to
Did you watch the game or just picked up the Sunday paper and looked at stats?

Their QB got rid of the ball very quick and never sat in the pocket past a few seconds. LSU guys were right there on multiple occations..
This post was edited on 9/17/12 at 7:32 am
Posted by Mayhawman
Somewhere in the middle of SEC West
Member since Dec 2009
10125 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 7:42 am to
4 INTs, 2 for TDs, and you gonna bitch about no sacks?????
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
127264 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 7:53 am to
Their game plan was to release the ball within 2 seconds. It's difficult to get a sack when the other team is doing that.
Posted by RobG14-0
Vinton, La.
Member since Aug 2012
247 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 8:07 am to
It's hard to sack a qb who takes a 3 step drop and gets rid of the ball. Sorry, bama can't even do that.
Posted by CajunFootball
Jackson, Mississippi
Member since Oct 2010
19432 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 9:41 am to
They did a ton of quick passes. That being said their QB took a beating.
Posted by Sits With Squirrels
Forward Unto Dawn
Member since Jul 2012
1257 posts
Posted on 9/17/12 at 11:00 am to
quote:

Just saw this in some article (I think on CFN). True story?


AND???

I'd rather the 2 pick 6's over a couple sacks..

Plus as fast as that QB was getting rid of the ball it was hard to get to him fast enough...
It would have taken Chuck Norris speed to get to him in enough time...
This post was edited on 9/17/12 at 11:01 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram