- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: F-150 Ecoboost: Anyone own one? Pros cons?
Posted on 8/3/12 at 7:04 pm to GaryMyMan
Posted on 8/3/12 at 7:04 pm to GaryMyMan
I agree with your post overall, I was just making the point that it's possible for a big V8 to get just as good of mileage as the Eco. The only benefits I can find in the Eco vs. the V8s is better city mpgs and better low end torque. But are those things alone worth the $1000+ premium? IMO, not really...but I just like V8s overall anyway. Definitely agree about the 5.3 though. It was a great engine......in 1999. GM needs to tweek it some and get it up to snuff with the competition. No comparison between that motor and an Eco.
Posted on 8/3/12 at 9:29 pm to jordan21210
The Ecoboost is great for around town driving and occasional towing. It gets good MPG while unloaded and the torque is great for towing. The torque curve is very similar to a diesel motor but once the turbos start spinning, the MPG drops (while towing).
I have the 6.2 and am very happy with it. I test drove a 3.5 and was impressed by it too. I did not get it because I do not like brand new motors (yes the 6.2 is new but simple technology). My motor has to rev up to 3500 RPMs to make the power that the 3.5 makes at 1500 RPMs. Both have their pros and cons. Now, two years later, I would have no worries buying a Ecoboost. It out performs almost every gas motor on the market including the 5.0 and 5.3. It gives the 5.7, 6.0, and 6.2 a run for their money and beats several of them in certain aspects.
I have the 6.2 and am very happy with it. I test drove a 3.5 and was impressed by it too. I did not get it because I do not like brand new motors (yes the 6.2 is new but simple technology). My motor has to rev up to 3500 RPMs to make the power that the 3.5 makes at 1500 RPMs. Both have their pros and cons. Now, two years later, I would have no worries buying a Ecoboost. It out performs almost every gas motor on the market including the 5.0 and 5.3. It gives the 5.7, 6.0, and 6.2 a run for their money and beats several of them in certain aspects.
Posted on 8/3/12 at 9:34 pm to jordan21210
Twin turbo the 5.3
I really like the eco boost. I'm glad somebody FINALLY put a forced induction gas engine in a truck.
I really like the eco boost. I'm glad somebody FINALLY put a forced induction gas engine in a truck.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News