Started By
Message

re: Liverpool FC 2012/13 Season Long Thread

Posted on 4/22/13 at 6:39 pm to
Posted by WeOnlyHateMancs
Member since Sep 2012
400 posts
Posted on 4/22/13 at 6:39 pm to
I was taking about his suspended red card. LINK. Read the paragraph before the last. I don't just make stuff up like you Bho.

They added the suspended ban to their Bakkal decision. I thought it was a three game ban for some reason not one. Clearly my memory is getting weaker. My bad.
This post was edited on 4/22/13 at 6:43 pm
Posted by Bho
Lexington
Member since Dec 2007
24804 posts
Posted on 4/22/13 at 6:50 pm to
quote:

I don't just make stuff up like you Bho.



Yeah you do. It clearly states one game. Do you see that you are the only one defending this trash? As I've said to a couple of the other Pool posters on here, I did feel bad for the club being put in this situation, but the more I think about it, they knew what they were getting. He is a loose cannon and there is no place in the game for his actions.



ETA:And if you're going to continue to live in fantasy land, let's just go with the Dutch gave him a four match ban. 1 for his suspended sentence for previous red, 2 given to him by Ajax and then 4 from league.

quote:

3. The Dutch ban was 3 for his Red Card + 4 for the actual offense. Given that the referee did not show him red. I can't see how the FA can tack that onto any decision they take.
Oh and this is your full quote so I guess you just forgot he didn't get a red in that game. You got called out. You were wrong. DWI
This post was edited on 4/22/13 at 6:57 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram