Started By
Message

re: I guess Matt Flynn was better than JaMarcus Russell after all

Posted on 1/1/12 at 8:10 pm to
Posted by Tiger_n_ATL
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2005
32457 posts
Posted on 1/1/12 at 8:10 pm to
quote:

I guess Matt Flynn was better than JaMarcus Russell after all
I said it several times for a few years and was raked over the coals relentlessly.

quote:

Boy was I wrong on that one.
I wasnt wrong, because I defined "good" not as "raw talent", but good as in understanding how to play the game, be a leader and make those around you better.

JR did not know how to do that, and that ultimately was his downfall. But anyone with any sense could see the train wreck coming. People like SFP and Hot Carl would be enamored by the raw talent, but have the inability to see the bad. and recognize it.
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
71964 posts
Posted on 1/1/12 at 8:26 pm to
JJ/JL threads were getting boring so the Rant had to bring in a classic.



Also are LSU fans the only people who could think the QB with the completion % 10+ points lower is the smart accurate one?
Posted by mrportcity
shreveport
Member since Nov 2009
115 posts
Posted on 1/1/12 at 8:55 pm to
put flynn in oakland under the same coaching staff and then.......
Posted by Swampcat
Member since Dec 2003
10316 posts
Posted on 1/1/12 at 9:35 pm to
Yes ,old news for anyone who knew the difference.
Posted by runridley
Member since Sep 2009
104 posts
Posted on 1/1/12 at 9:42 pm to
Jamarcus Russell was a great college quarterback who started for appx 2 1/2 years while Matt Flynn was only given 1 year. The NFL has a way of separating quarterbacks. Seems that Jamarcus lacks either mental confidence, drive or both. Matt Flynn didn't possess the enormous physical arm that Jamarcus has, but obviously has something that Jamarcus doesn't.
Posted by Swampcat
Member since Dec 2003
10316 posts
Posted on 1/1/12 at 9:45 pm to
Yes ,old news for anyone who knew the difference.
Posted by LockdownDefense
Member since Aug 2008
4441 posts
Posted on 1/1/12 at 10:29 pm to
Of the two i always thought flynn had the better brains and had a bigger future
Posted by TenTex
Member since Jan 2008
15949 posts
Posted on 1/2/12 at 6:16 am to
Come on, JR is the more physically gifted QB and Flynn is the smarter/better game manager. Flynn is a Bart Star/Joe Montana type of QB.
Posted by infantry1026
Louisiana
Member since Jan 2010
6051 posts
Posted on 1/2/12 at 7:56 am to
quote:

Boy was I wrong on that one.


I was trying to tell people this when he was JR's back-up. It goes to show you that CLM can be wrong too
Posted by Mike da Tigah
Bravo Romeo Lima Alpha
Member since Feb 2005
59137 posts
Posted on 1/2/12 at 8:17 am to
But but but Jamrcus could pass the length of the football field on his knees.
Posted by Tha Truth
Kenner
Member since Apr 2008
417 posts
Posted on 1/2/12 at 8:51 am to
Russell was a far better QB at LSU than Flynn was. Not only did he possess more natural talent than Flynn, Russell also performed better on the field. I love Matt and always will for QBing the NC team but anyone that says that he was better at LSU in anyway is either really dumb or really racist.


It appears as though Flynn will have the better NFL career, but I think he was in a better situation to succeed than Russell was. Flynn was able to learn from the sidelines from a coaching staff that is great with QBs. Russell was drafted by one the absolute worst ran teams in the league with a horrible head coach that didn't want him in the first place. Not sure if any QB could have succeeded in Oakland under the same set of circumstances as JaMarcus faced. The one that actually probably hurt him the most was being drafted #1 overall. If he had slipped in the draft he would have ended up with a better team and having something to prove. Getting all that money and unwarranted sense of entitlement by being taken #1 overall was just what he needed to destroy his career.
Posted by ottothewise
Member since Sep 2008
32094 posts
Posted on 1/2/12 at 9:08 am to
Russell believed his press clippings and his agent.

Flynn has had the chance to be a back up for years.

When they were at LSU I preferred Flynn, because he knew where the chains were and kept drives alive by running to the chains.
Posted by Tiger Ugly
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
14663 posts
Posted on 1/2/12 at 9:10 am to
quote:

I guess Matt Flynn was better than JaMarcus Russell after all


Boy was I wrong on that one. Flynn's got almost a third of JR's career TD passes today.


Me too Ritt. And Les too.

After JR was drafted No. 1 Les said..."see we were playing the right guy after all."

To be fair JR had a pretty darn good senior year, every bit as good as Flynn's senior year if not better IMHO. Both good college QB's but one had a better work ethic obviously. When you get to the NFL it's a man game and you have to choose to do the work yourself to keep up. Flynn obviously has, and JR obviously has not.
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 1/2/12 at 9:35 am to
quote:

I guess Matt Flynn was better than JaMarcus Russell after all


Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Exhibit A as to why the JJ/JL argument will never be over. 8 pages of arguing over whether Flynn's pro "success" retroactively makes him the better QB while at LSU. Players that have not taken a snap at LSU for 4-5 years...

Never.

Going.

Away.
Posted by hondapa26
Gonzales, LA
Member since Sep 2005
3146 posts
Posted on 1/2/12 at 10:54 am to
College-NO
Pro- YES

This is a retarded thread!
Posted by Ghostfacedistiller
BR
Member since Jun 2008
17500 posts
Posted on 1/2/12 at 1:45 pm to
I'm not reading this shite. Yeah MF is better on 1/1/12. Between 2005 and 2006 JR was the better QB and was rightfully the starter.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram