- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Would you trade Ingram for Trent Richardson right now?
Posted on 11/17/11 at 11:39 am to SJS Eagle 85
Posted on 11/17/11 at 11:39 am to SJS Eagle 85
quote:
What were the 6 imcompletions (75%) worth?
Not 6 points.
Posted on 11/17/11 at 11:58 am to The Sad Banana
What's sad is that Richardson will more likely than not come into the league and wind up carrying a majority of the load for a team in the first couple of years.
What people don't seem to ever understand, is that most of our own running backs would fare well on other teams. But we split carries between AT LEAST 3 backs (if not 4 some games). Even Richardson would find it difficult to gain heavy amounts of yardage with that set up.
What people don't seem to ever understand, is that most of our own running backs would fare well on other teams. But we split carries between AT LEAST 3 backs (if not 4 some games). Even Richardson would find it difficult to gain heavy amounts of yardage with that set up.
Posted on 11/17/11 at 12:08 pm to dcrews
Just as good of a question is, would YOU trade Chase Daniel for Andrew Luck? Im really on the fence with that one
Posted on 11/17/11 at 12:24 pm to dcrews
Just as good of a question is, would YOU trade Chase Daniel for Andrew Luck? Im really on the fence with that one
Posted on 11/17/11 at 12:24 pm to HeadCoach
Just as good of a question is, would YOU trade Chase Daniel for Andrew Luck? Im really on the fence with that one
Hmm.
Well Jarrett Lee had a good game vs Oregon and Luck not so much so I would trade Chase for Lee and start the run on LSU players early!
Hmm.
Well Jarrett Lee had a good game vs Oregon and Luck not so much so I would trade Chase for Lee and start the run on LSU players early!
Posted on 11/17/11 at 5:13 pm to Kcrad
Go to ESPN.com and look at Ingram's situational stats and then tell me he goes down on the first hit.
Posted on 11/17/11 at 7:13 pm to Sophandros
Give the poor bastard some time, then piss and moan about getting someone else who may be even worse
Posted on 11/17/11 at 8:20 pm to The Mick
I would not. I think Ingram is the better RB.
Posted on 11/18/11 at 7:27 am to HeadCoach
quote:Right this second I would not, Daniel has looked pretty good to me, albeit in preseason games..
Just as good of a question is, would YOU trade Chase Daniel for Andrew Luck? Im really on the fence with that one
Posted on 11/18/11 at 5:11 pm to moneyg
quote:
I would not. I think Ingram is the better RB.
No way
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconbanghead.gif)
Posted on 11/19/11 at 7:16 am to Kcrad
Ingram should never have been drafted by the saints, much less in round 1.
Posted on 11/19/11 at 8:43 am to CptRusty
quote:
More like: The bad team that Tebow happened to be playing on won. His two complete passes are hardly what I would call a "contribution".
Drew Brees sneezes 65 yards. Even mentioning Tebow in the same sentence as Brees is heresy.
"But he finds a way to win". bullshite. The TEAM found a way to win...all he did was not frick it up by getting in the way. His 8 attempts should be evidence enough of the coaching staff's confidence in his ability to play quarterback, but I suppose some people have their tongue too far up Tebow's arse and don't want to hear that.
A win is a win.
In no way am I comparing Brees to Tebow. That's ludicrous.
My tongue is nowhere near Tebow's arse.
He will be a quality backup QB in this league for years.
Posted on 11/19/11 at 8:45 am to TTB
quote:
How about drafting an O-line that can run block and open up a hole?
An excellent point.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconbow.gif)
Posted on 11/19/11 at 9:29 am to SuperRemo
Yes he always was the better RB period
Posted on 11/19/11 at 11:07 am to The Mick
Richardson was the better NFL prospect the day he stepped on campus
Posted on 11/19/11 at 2:39 pm to The Mick
Yeah. Ingram is overrated and not going to live up to the hype. Ingram will end up being a dud.
Posted on 11/19/11 at 2:46 pm to Tiger1955
no....no more bammer runningbacks
Posted on 11/19/11 at 7:48 pm to Tiger1955
quote:
Message Posted by Tiger1955 Yeah. Ingram is overrated and not going to live up to the hype. Ingram will end up being a dud.
Maybe not dud but he probably not going to live up to cost to get him.
And that's less his fault and more a product of the nature of the RB position and the Saints offense having a RBBC.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)