- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Ted Miller BCS chat still blaming Oregons turnovers
Posted on 11/14/11 at 1:08 pm
Posted on 11/14/11 at 1:08 pm
For creating the false impression that SEC defenses are so good.
What a toolbag.
quote:
Comment From Chris Chris : Oregon is still overrated. they have already proven that they can't contend against great defense
Ted Miller: Chris... 19 plays, 79 yards vs. LSU... Oregon proved that if it turns the ball over four times against LSU, folks are going to make sweeping statements about SEC defenses.
What a toolbag.
This post was edited on 11/14/11 at 1:24 pm
10
Posted on 11/14/11 at 1:10 pm to LSUNatedogg
I love people that act like turnovers are just acts of God. Some are self-inflicted, and a ton are not.
This post was edited on 11/14/11 at 1:11 pm
Posted on 11/14/11 at 1:10 pm to LSUNatedogg
HUGE difference in a Turnover and a Takeaway
Posted on 11/14/11 at 1:10 pm to LSUNatedogg
Tell Oregon to ask themselves if they win vs Stanford without all those turnovers they got?
Pot = Kettle
Pot = Kettle
Posted on 11/14/11 at 1:12 pm to LSUNatedogg
19 plays for 79 yards? WTF? Oregon had much more than 19 plays. And it's not like 19 for 79 is all that great.
Posted on 11/14/11 at 1:13 pm to Bosethus68
So did the Stanford game prove that unless Oregon is +3 in turnover margin, it can't beat a decent team?
Posted on 11/14/11 at 1:14 pm to TopWaterTiger
So he's blaming TM7 and SM99?
Posted on 11/14/11 at 1:14 pm to Baloo
quote:
19 plays for 79 yards? WTF?
19 play drive in the 2nd quarter. That's when they took the lead(for about 5 minutes).
Because as we all know, if you're a good defense, you never give up a long drive. Ever.
Posted on 11/14/11 at 1:18 pm to OldManRiver
Oh, wow. They had one good drive? That's cherry picking of the highest order.
Posted on 11/14/11 at 1:20 pm to OldManRiver
And they only took that lead because of a terrible personal foul call on Loston.
Posted on 11/14/11 at 1:21 pm to Baloo
they had a really good drive down 40-20 late in the 4th too. we made them milk the entire clock though as we were playing a prevent defense
Posted on 11/14/11 at 1:22 pm to LSUNatedogg
quote:
folks are going to make sweeping statements about SEC defenses.
Has Ted taken a look at the total D stats?
fricking ignorant tool.
This post was edited on 11/14/11 at 1:28 pm
Posted on 11/14/11 at 1:22 pm to OldManRiver
quote:
Because as we all know, if you're a good defense, you never give up a long drive. Ever
Homers gonna home, I guess.
I'm fine with Oregon or Pac12 fans arguing that they are as deserving for a rematch as Bama, but the lack of respect for LSU after all the shite it has accomplished this year is mind bottling.
Posted on 11/14/11 at 1:23 pm to LSUNatedogg
you know what good teams do? they hold on to the ball.
i am sorry that oregon isn't a good enough team to hold onto the ball.
why doesn't oklahoma state get killed? they lead the nation in takeaways. but well they win because of their offense. somehow the turnover argument doesn't apply to them.
i am sorry that oregon isn't a good enough team to hold onto the ball.
why doesn't oklahoma state get killed? they lead the nation in takeaways. but well they win because of their offense. somehow the turnover argument doesn't apply to them.
Posted on 11/14/11 at 1:23 pm to TopWaterTiger
Would want rematch vs oregon over bama anytime
Posted on 11/14/11 at 1:24 pm to LSUNatedogg
quote:
mind bottling.
lol
Posted on 11/14/11 at 1:25 pm to TopWaterTiger
quote:
Tell Oregon to ask themselves if they win vs Stanford without all those turnovers they got?
Come on now...Oregon FORCED those turnovers against Stanford. LSU only benefited from Oregon making self-inflicted mistakes...LSU didn't FORCE anything.
Or so we are lead to believe in the Oregon spin of the game.
Posted on 11/14/11 at 1:26 pm to RummelTiger
Rummel, quote was not separated. Ted miller is the tool you are looking for.
Glad the reference wasn't lost.
Glad the reference wasn't lost.
Posted on 11/14/11 at 1:28 pm to LSUNatedogg
Guys Oregon has really improved. They improved so fast right after our game! LOL The Pac 12 has been really weak. Did anyone else not think that Oregon was going to run the table again "beat an overrated Standford" and that's why it was so important for LSU to just beat them "not dismantle them like we did" to take them out of the discussion this year. Oregon had 95 yds. rushing "like Al." and we held LMJ to 54 yds. while letting them score only 27 points with the last touchdown in late few minutes garbage time. Oregon scored 69,56,56,43,41,45,43,34,53 in their games after ours. Their rushing yds after their big 95 against us were 272,416,415,365,327,371,213,212,232 against Standford. They haven't improved that much "and we've improved too"; they just got to play their easy conference/schedule. They DO NOT DESERVE ANOTHER SHOT.
Posted on 11/14/11 at 1:28 pm to LSUNatedogg
Fixed!
Ted Miller...
Ted Miller...
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News