- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

32 photographs of Reid's interception
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:35 pm
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:35 pm
Leaving any doubt that the staunchest of Bama fans might have as to the legitimacy of the interception call as little more than delusion. Courtesy of the greatest paper on the planet, The Times Picayune. Below those pictures are screen captures from the CBS telecast. Below those are pictures from a Bama photographer.
Be sure to talk about epistemological matters such as these in The Daily Bible Study Thread found on the OT starting around 6 each night.
Daily Bible Study Thread on the OT: learn it, live it, love it.
Be sure to talk about epistemological matters such as these in The Daily Bible Study Thread found on the OT starting around 6 each night.
Daily Bible Study Thread on the OT: learn it, live it, love it.
This post was edited on 11/9/11 at 6:20 pm
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:38 pm to TulaneLSU
2 photos that seal the deal for me.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:39 pm to TulaneLSU
Is that a contusion on Reid's right shin?
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:39 pm to TulaneLSU
if that wasn't call a interception on the field, we could very well be 8-1
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:40 pm to TulaneLSU
They'll still bitch.
But very nice!
But very nice!
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:41 pm to BRgetthenet
These pictures don't mean shite to me.
The video clearly shows it's an interception though.
The video clearly shows it's an interception though.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:41 pm to BRgetthenet
It was a pick! FACT!
But if anyone wants to say otherwise, well, Bama owed us one for 2009, we are even now!
But if anyone wants to say otherwise, well, Bama owed us one for 2009, we are even now!
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:41 pm to GumboPot
Proof it wasn't a pick. Open wound means he shouldn't have been in the game. 
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:42 pm to dreaux
It would've been overturned. At least the correct call would be to overturn it there was undeniable proof in the replay that it was an interception.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:42 pm to dreaux
quote:
if that wasn't call a interception on the field, we could very well be 8-1
Not sure about this. The replay result was:
"The ruling on the field is CONFIRMED!" This means the evidence supports the call.
Otherwise, they say:
"The ruling on the field STANDS" This means there is NOT sufficient evidence to overturn.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:42 pm to TulaneLSU
TBH these photos dont show me a clear interception.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:43 pm to BayouWrangler
I agree with the call completely...the last two shots nail it. I'm still somewhat shocked that the refs didn't call it Bama's way. It was verrrry close.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:44 pm to TulaneLSU
Between picture 5 & 6 it is clear the ball has turned 90 degrees in a fraction of a second. That is the part where the receiver doesn't "maintain control".
In picture 7, you can clearly see the ball on top of Reid. It is not clear if the receiver has his hands on the ball, but it looks to be closer to Reid's possession than his.
Another picture from the opposite side of #7 would clear up any doubt. Had the ball hit the ground instead of Reid, there would be little doubt that it was an incompletion.
Great Play!
In picture 7, you can clearly see the ball on top of Reid. It is not clear if the receiver has his hands on the ball, but it looks to be closer to Reid's possession than his.
Another picture from the opposite side of #7 would clear up any doubt. Had the ball hit the ground instead of Reid, there would be little doubt that it was an incompletion.
Great Play!
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:44 pm to The Mick
How does it not? it clearly shows the ball was moving around in his hands which means he does not have possession then it clearly shows that Reid has it on the ground. What else could it be? its not a incomplete pass because it never touched the ground. Its not a completion because the bama player didnt retain control. So it must be a interception.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:44 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Is that a contusion on Reid's right shin?
Dear God!
Why did you have to point that out?!
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:44 pm to The Mick
Seems like we skipped some area where he stripped it before they hit the ground.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:45 pm to CottonWasKing
The view from the endzone was better, more conclusive.
Posted on 11/9/11 at 3:46 pm to TwinkleToez
quote:
bible study >>> THIS
Popular
Back to top

20










