Started By
Message

re: Both Sides of the Case Will Be Presented to the Grand Jury

Posted on 9/21/11 at 9:33 am to
Posted by just me
Front of the Class: Schooling You
Member since Mar 2006
34489 posts
Posted on 9/21/11 at 9:33 am to
quote:

tl;dr

Don't care.
quote:

Wait.....self defense?

I thought there were numerous witnesses that said Jefferson wasn't involved at all.
Wait.....you read it?

25 witnesses have stated that Jefferson was not involved in the fight. The DNA tests do not implicate Jefferson. That's a big deal.

So the DA has to deal with that.


I'm not saying it was self-defense. Unglesby is not saying it was self-defense. Jefferson has not said it was self-defense.

However, if the DA thinks it might just boil down to a he / she said thing, the DA also has to consider self-defense.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126965 posts
Posted on 9/21/11 at 9:34 am to
quote:

if the DA thinks it might just boil down to a he / she said thing, the DA also has to consider self-defense.


Why does the DA HAVE to consider that when not a single witness (to my knowledge) has hinted at it?
Posted by booky
covington
Member since Dec 2008
280 posts
Posted on 9/21/11 at 9:37 am to
quote:

So it doesn't appear JJ will be back in time for Kentucky?


Thank God.....
Posted by USMCTiger03
Member since Sep 2007
71176 posts
Posted on 9/21/11 at 9:49 am to
quote:

25 witnesses have stated that Jefferson was not involved in the fight.
How do you know this?
Posted by Cadello
Eunice
Member since Dec 2007
47810 posts
Posted on 9/21/11 at 10:48 pm to
quote:

quote:
tl;dr

Don't care.
quote:
Wait.....self defense?

I thought there were numerous witnesses that said Jefferson wasn't involved at all.
Wait.....you read it?
Dude is a joke
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram