Started By
Message

re: I have a dream - Tigers vs Bama in BCSNC

Posted on 9/7/11 at 9:35 pm to
Posted by oleheat
Sportsman's Paradise
Member since Mar 2007
13498 posts
Posted on 9/7/11 at 9:35 pm to
Florida has come about as close to this as we'll ever see.

In 1996, their only defeat was a cheapshot-filled regular season loss to FSU...They landed a rematch in the Sugar Bowl for the national title and routed the 'Noles....
Posted by bakersman
Shreveport
Member since Apr 2011
5718 posts
Posted on 9/7/11 at 10:00 pm to
voters wanted it to happen with ohio state and michigan in 06, but florida looked too good to pass on after the why they crushed arkansas in the sec title game. If florida had lost, it would have been a michigan ohio state rematch. It really came down to florida's strength of schedule in the computers.
Posted by HubbaBubba
F_uck Joe Biden, TX
Member since Oct 2010
45848 posts
Posted on 9/7/11 at 10:15 pm to
Let's say LSU-Bama is a nail-biter, defensive struggle and the game is decided on a last second block of an extra point meant to tie the game. In all other regards, the teams played evenly with no fluke scores. There is enough time left in the year at that point for the winner to go on and stay #1... win the CG and the loser to get back to #2 and stay there. Even if Boise is 12-0, with that schedule, there is absolutely no way I can fathom Boise beating out a 1 loss LSU or Bama under those circumstances. No way! The public will be clamoring for the rematch. You guys think the NC game last year was super expensive?
OMG! A Bama/LSU NC game? Nosebleed seats will be going for $5000 each!
Posted by Blackhawk22
Newport Coast, CA
Member since Sep 2010
48 posts
Posted on 9/7/11 at 10:22 pm to
Michigan Ohio State was the last game of the regular season. No one wanted to see the same game a month later....


LSU/Bama is mid season. Those teams grow over the last half of the season.
Posted by lsumatt
Austin
Member since Feb 2005
12812 posts
Posted on 9/7/11 at 10:40 pm to
For everyone to say it is impossible, that just isn't true. Obviously it would be hard, but if there was ever a case for it would be 11-1 LSU against 12-1 SEC Champ Bama

1) LSU may have beaten both the Pac 12 and Big East Champ, with their sole loss on the road to the SEC Champ

2) The Michigan/Ohio State example is a terrible one and if anything is proof that LSU could play Bama. Those teams came very, very close to playing each other. plenty of voters had them 1 and 2. But Florida played a tougher schedule and the computers had a lot to do the jump. LSU will be helped greatly by the computers. Hell, 11-1 LSU would likely be higher than 12-1 Bama. Of course, it all depends what other teams are out there...but this is a REAL possibility.
Posted by jmay2007
Choppa City
Member since May 2010
818 posts
Posted on 9/7/11 at 10:43 pm to
Slow your roll, MLK.
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
59287 posts
Posted on 9/7/11 at 10:44 pm to
quote:

Let's say LSU-Bama is a nail-biter, defensive struggle and the game is decided on a last second block of an extra point meant to tie the game. In all other regards, the teams played evenly with no fluke scores. There is enough time left in the year at that point for the winner to go on and stay #1... win the CG and the loser to get back to #2 and stay there. Even if Boise is 12-0, with that schedule, there is absolutely no way I can fathom Boise beating out a 1 loss LSU or Bama under those circumstances. No way



Ok, let's say that happens. And LSU wins the rematch. At the end of the season, you'd have Alabama with a 13-1 record and SEC Champions. LSU would be 12-1 and not SEC champions. And they would be 1-1 against each other. And you think LSU should be National Champs? Ummm...no. If LSU wants to win the NC, they can beat Bama in the regular season. If not, tough shite.


quote:

The public will be clamoring for the rematch



No, they really won't. The ONLY people who'd want a rematch would be fans of the losing team of the 1st game.
Posted by lsumatt
Austin
Member since Feb 2005
12812 posts
Posted on 9/7/11 at 10:49 pm to
quote:

And they would be 1-1 against each other. And you think LSU should be National Champs?


Last I checked the New York Giants were the World champions in 2008?, not the 18-1 Patriots who beat them twice in the regular season.
Posted by geauxtigers2
Lawrence, Kansas
Member since Jul 2007
4822 posts
Posted on 9/7/11 at 10:50 pm to
quote:


Ok, let's say that happens. And LSU wins the rematch. At the end of the season, you'd have Alabama with a 13-1 record and SEC Champions. LSU would be 12-1 and not SEC champions. And they would be 1-1 against each other. And you think LSU should be National Champs? Ummm...no. If LSU wants to win the NC, they can beat Bama in the regular season. If not, tough shite.
Rather win the National Championship then the SEC.
Posted by edctiger
Lafayette
Member since Apr 2011
83 posts
Posted on 9/7/11 at 10:51 pm to
Everyone outside the SEC would throw a fit about the guaranteed 6th in a row for the SEC. I think the only way it happens is if we're talking about both being undefeated except for the loser of LSU/Bama, and every other major team having more than one loss.

If an undefeated Boise jumped ahead of a one loss LSU or Bama, I would hate them even more than I do now. And that would be saying something.
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
59287 posts
Posted on 9/7/11 at 10:51 pm to
quote:

Last I checked the New York Giants were the World champions in 2008?, not the 18-1 Patriots who beat them twice in the regular season.



Last I checked CFB >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NFL because body of work counts. C'mon, Matt, you're better than that.



And I'm not saying it can't happen, just that it shouldn't.
Posted by lsumatt
Austin
Member since Feb 2005
12812 posts
Posted on 9/7/11 at 10:57 pm to
quote:

And I'm not saying it can't happen, just that it shouldn't.


That's fine. But it can definitely happen unlike the claim of many on here. Regardless of what anyone says it came damn close in 2006 and absolutely would have if Florida lost the SECCG.

I am not for it, but if there are a bunch of 2 loss teams and then 1-loss LSU who played one of the toughest schedules ever by a NC contender. Would you really think we should have a 2 loss Oregon go over 1 loss LSU?
Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
59287 posts
Posted on 9/7/11 at 11:04 pm to
quote:

But it can definitely happen unlike the claim of many on here


Oh, I know it can happen. I've said argued that against the guys who say "the pollsters won't let it." Well, they're only part of it, they'd have to go out of their way to move teams down lower than they deserve to avoid it. And that should get their votes taken away.



quote:

I am not for it, but if there are a bunch of 2 loss teams and then 1-loss LSU who played one of the toughest schedules ever by a NC contender. Would you really think we should have a 2 loss Oregon go over 1 loss LSU?



Well, we're on the same page here. I guess I just try to imagine if it were LSU who won the initial game and was sitting as 13-0 and SEC champs and were forced to have to beat Bama again. But in an abnormal year like '07, I'd certainly want the more deserving, 1-loss team playing. And make no mistake, if LSU lost the 1st game, my emotions would dominate my sense of justice, and I'd be clamoring from the rooftops as much as any LSU yahoo on earth.





Posted by lsumatt
Austin
Member since Feb 2005
12812 posts
Posted on 9/7/11 at 11:12 pm to
yeah, like you said college football is based on "body of work". If LSU lost and its body of work was much better than other contender to play bama, then so be it. If it is a close call between LSU and someone else, the polls will and should give the nod to that other team.

That is why I like the checks and balances of the BCS computers and human polls. Computers carry enough weight to give deserving teams there due but not so much that they trump common sense. Va Tech had a slightly better computer score than LSU in 07, but the human polls put LSU ahead (without having to unethically push Va tech down).
Posted by UGATiger26
Jacksonville, FL
Member since Dec 2009
9049 posts
Posted on 9/8/11 at 5:57 am to
quote:

Oh, I know it can happen. I've said argued that against the guys who say "the pollsters won't let it." Well, they're only part of it, they'd have to go out of their way to move teams down lower than they deserve to avoid it. And that should get their votes taken away.


They would move a team down. I am not arguing that, based on schedule strength, that an 11-1 LSU or Bama could/should be #2. But if there is an 12-1 or 11-1 Oklahoma/Oklahoma St./Florida St./West Va./Stanford/Etc, etc the voters would put that team in the NC. And with non-AQ sympathy the way it is, YES, a 12-0 Boise would get the nod over an 11-1 LSU or Bama.
This post was edited on 9/8/11 at 6:00 am
Posted by TigerTreyjpg
Monroe, LA
Member since Jun 2008
5815 posts
Posted on 9/8/11 at 7:19 am to
I'd like to have seen the point differential last year had LSU beaten AR.

Posted by tiger chaser
Birmingham Ala
Member since Feb 2008
7624 posts
Posted on 9/8/11 at 7:43 am to
Yes you are having an OLD-TIMERS MOMENT...wake up,..will not happen...NOW, go take your meds...
Posted by lsumatt
Austin
Member since Feb 2005
12812 posts
Posted on 9/8/11 at 7:58 am to
quote:

But if there is an 12-1 or 11-1 Oklahoma/Oklahoma St./Florida St./West Va./Stanford/Etc, etc the voters would put that team in the NC.


1. We would likely be above a West Virginia team that we beat on the road

2. People always completely ignore the computers and then they act there is this big conspiracy in the polls to keep teams "out". Sure most pollsters may put 11-1 Oklahoma State at #2 and 11-1 LSU at #3 because they think they are better but there is no history to suggest they will drop below 2-loss teams or anything. And if LSU is #3 in the polls and #1 in the computers, LSU probably gets in.
Posted by dreaux
baton rouge
Member since Oct 2006
40881 posts
Posted on 9/8/11 at 8:07 am to
Keep dreaming
Posted by SouljaBreauxTellEm
Mizz
Member since Aug 2009
29343 posts
Posted on 9/8/11 at 8:33 am to
i would not use michigan/osu to compare bama/lsu national championship prospects.

i am so sick of hearing that. i think it's actually quite more possible than people think. first off it is much more appealing to all. and if that was the case these 2 would be the best teams in the country.

a 1 loss bama/lsu would be more deserving than any 1 loss big 12 or acc school.. plus if bama is that 1 loss school they always get more national respect and praise than they even deserve any ways. the masses over rate the hell out of them.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram