- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

A&M, OU, Mizzou, VT
Posted on 8/18/11 at 6:19 pm
Posted on 8/18/11 at 6:19 pm
Seems to be chatter about those 4 being added. I hope not. I'm in favor of A&M and VT only
Posted on 8/18/11 at 6:23 pm to Big Kat
There has been chatter about tons of different groups of 4. The only constant in those chatters has been aTm. Where are you getting this "chatter" from?
Posted on 8/18/11 at 6:23 pm to Big Kat
We don't get OU without OSU.
Posted on 8/18/11 at 6:25 pm to Henry Jones Jr
Not breaking up va and tech
Posted on 8/18/11 at 6:28 pm to Big Kat
This list makes more sense to me. IMO those four would pass the current eastern members litmus test. I personally don't see Choklahoma and Okie State separating though. Choklahoma is Slive's number one target.
This post was edited on 8/18/11 at 6:29 pm
Posted on 8/18/11 at 6:32 pm to Big Kat
FSU, Clemson, aTm, and ________ make most sense to me
Posted on 8/18/11 at 6:36 pm to dkreller
quote:
FSU, Clemson, aTm, and ________ make most sense to me
Mizzou is ok in that foursome, 2 clear east, 2 clear west
although I did hear Brando the other day say the SEC wants new markets, something FSU and Clemson are not. He also said UVA and VaTech could become a package deal in his opinion
Posted on 8/18/11 at 6:36 pm to oOoLsUtIgErSoOo
Twitter. Guy named Matt Jackson.
And a bunch of message board people claiming they know a guy
Eventually someone will be right
And a bunch of message board people claiming they know a guy
Eventually someone will be right
Posted on 8/18/11 at 6:37 pm to Big Kat
Under that scenario, one team has to move east--Auburn?
Posted on 8/18/11 at 6:37 pm to Big Kat
I dont see the point in adding Missouri, ill rather go after Kansas than them.
Posted on 8/18/11 at 6:38 pm to dj30
Mizzou isn't bad with Pinkel. But I think their brand of football is too soft for the SEC. Might not translate well
Posted on 8/18/11 at 6:39 pm to Big Kat
Who ever it is it's time to get this shite over with. 
Posted on 8/18/11 at 6:42 pm to nerd guy
Rumor not true
Screw 0U. WE (the sec) don't need them
Screw 0U. WE (the sec) don't need them
Posted on 8/18/11 at 6:44 pm to Big Kat
quote:
Mizzou isn't bad with Pinkel. But I think their brand of football is too soft for the SEC. Might not translate well
fan perspective
SEC perspective: New Markets that have no SEC teams currently
Posted on 8/18/11 at 6:46 pm to stapuffmarshy
No doubt, stapuff. I was purely talking of their football.
Posted on 8/18/11 at 6:48 pm to Big Kat
FWIW
quote:
billyliucci Billy Liucci Have confirmed via high-level sources that rumors of Mizzou, OU and VT plus A&M to SEC have as much teeth as the old lady in Kingpin #false
Posted on 8/18/11 at 6:50 pm to rollthatback
quote:
have as much teeth as the old lady in Kingpin
me likey Bill Murray
Popular
Back to top

21










