Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Alice in Wonderland made $1B..

Posted on 7/31/11 at 12:00 am
Posted by Xenophon
Aspen
Member since Feb 2006
42154 posts
Posted on 7/31/11 at 12:00 am
i had no idea.. i assumed this movie was terrible and never watched it..

The other $1B+ movies are predictable

Posted by PelicanHuey
BR/BC
Member since Feb 2011
446 posts
Posted on 7/31/11 at 12:05 am to
It's not my favorite Tim Burton movie, but it was worth seeing just for the visuals. I don't really know why it was so successful though. I guess it rode the 3d wave on Avatar's coattails.
Posted by Acreboy
Member since Nov 2005
38568 posts
Posted on 7/31/11 at 12:07 am to
3d
Posted by blzr
Saratoga
Member since Mar 2011
30510 posts
Posted on 7/31/11 at 12:08 am to
I thought it was pretty good.
Posted by WoWyHi
Member since Jul 2009
23339 posts
Posted on 7/31/11 at 12:09 am to
I enjoyed it. Like others have said, it was a visually stunning movie.
This post was edited on 7/31/11 at 12:10 am
Posted by tigerbait2010
PNW
Member since May 2006
31830 posts
Posted on 7/31/11 at 12:13 am to
lots of kids smoke weed too
Posted by jmarto1
Houma, LA/ Las Vegas, NV
Member since Mar 2008
36318 posts
Posted on 7/31/11 at 12:13 am to
Silly thought, but do they adjust these figures for inflation? The price of a ticket to see Titanic was surely cheaper than seeing POTC.
Posted by baytiger
Boston
Member since Dec 2007
46978 posts
Posted on 7/31/11 at 12:41 am to
Looks like HP7 part 2 is about to join that club, currently at 948.5 million
Posted by baytiger
Boston
Member since Dec 2007
46978 posts
Posted on 7/31/11 at 12:43 am to
quote:

Silly thought, but do they adjust these figures for inflation?


those aren't adjusted for inflation

otherwise you'd see shite like Gone With the Wind, Star Wars, and Sound of Music on there.
Posted by bulldog95
North Louisiana
Member since Jan 2011
21040 posts
Posted on 7/31/11 at 1:08 am to
good movie. My kids and wife loved it.
Posted by RebelNutt48
Valdosta, GA
Member since Apr 2010
8188 posts
Posted on 7/31/11 at 1:13 am to
I liked it.
Posted by Phate
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
11773 posts
Posted on 7/31/11 at 1:29 am to
quote:


Silly thought, but do they adjust these figures for inflation? The price of a ticket to see Titanic was surely cheaper than seeing POTC.



Box office mojo has a list of the top grossing movies adjusted for inflation. Gone With The Wind is in the top spot. Avatar isn't in the top 10. Out of the top 10 only 1 came out before 1982 and that was Titanic.
This post was edited on 7/31/11 at 1:33 am
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 7/31/11 at 8:12 am to
Watched Toy Story 3 last night because it's on Netflix.

Pixar is incredible. What can I say.

Posted by L S Usetheforce
Member since Jun 2004
23141 posts
Posted on 7/31/11 at 8:45 am to
quote:

Watched Toy Story 3 last night because it's on Netflix.


So you only watched it cause it was on netflix and not because it is awesome? Typical Rex.
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
38491 posts
Posted on 7/31/11 at 10:01 am to
quote:

Out of the top 10 only 1 came out before 1982 and that was Titanic


You mean after 1982?

Xen: I wouldn't let the $1B number fool you into thinking it's a great movie. It's ok. Nothing special. Very typical Tim Burton.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
75058 posts
Posted on 7/31/11 at 10:12 am to
Wasn't a huge fan of it. I was hoping that Burton would have taken a darker angle with it, but the fact that it was pg13 and Disney, he had to make it a little more child oriented.

Of all fantasy stories, Alice in Wonderland would be one of the best to convert into a dark, gritty, horror-lined movie.
Posted by Phate
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
11773 posts
Posted on 7/31/11 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

You mean after 1982?


Yeah thats what I meant.

So older movies made so much money for their time. Was that because there weren't as many options or because they were a lot better than movies today? Now I know Hollywood puts out a lot of terrible movies but even the best ones of today haven't come close to those classic movies of the past when you take into account inflation.
Posted by graychef
Member since Jun 2008
29511 posts
Posted on 7/31/11 at 2:36 pm to
There's alway the gross revenue debate with current movies, including 3D, compared to older movies. A better debate, if available, would be net revenue, since current movies cost a whole lot more to produce and market than those classics.
Posted by Tigah in the ATL
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2005
27539 posts
Posted on 7/31/11 at 2:44 pm to
$690 international

Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
38491 posts
Posted on 7/31/11 at 5:09 pm to
quote:

So older movies made so much money for their time. Was that because there weren't as many options or because they were a lot better than movies today? Now I know Hollywood puts out a lot of terrible movies but even the best ones of today haven't come close to those classic movies of the past when you take into account inflation.


Seems like I read somewhere that they are less people going to the theaters nowadays. I'm sure it's because of the economy.

There are good movies out there today it's just not what people go see and it's not the movies that make a lot of money. Comic book movies and summer blockbusters dominate the market so much. That being said, I think there is more crap out there right now than there has ever been.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram