Started By
Message
locked post

Is there a better scope than this?

Posted on 6/28/11 at 3:13 pm
Posted by nhassl1
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2008
1934 posts
Posted on 6/28/11 at 3:13 pm


Swarovski Z6
expensive as hell but probably worth it for that once in a lifetime shot. What other scopes can compare to one like this?
Posted by bayoudude
Member since Dec 2007
25893 posts
Posted on 6/28/11 at 3:17 pm to
Schmidt and Bender

Zeiss

Have comparable scopes but it is damn hard to beat a top end Swarovski.
Posted by willow2
Tulsa, Ok
Member since Jan 2010
1267 posts
Posted on 6/28/11 at 3:20 pm to
have one on my 300WSM and love it, hard to beat swarovski glass
Posted by Crawdaddy
Slidell. The jewel of Louisiana
Member since Sep 2006
19210 posts
Posted on 6/28/11 at 3:21 pm to
My Simmons 44 mag scope on my .06 has yet to miss. So, for the price I paid, Mine is better.
Posted by CajunFootball
Jackson, Mississippi
Member since Oct 2010
19432 posts
Posted on 6/28/11 at 3:23 pm to
My Zeiss is all I can ask for.

Posted by nhassl1
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2008
1934 posts
Posted on 6/28/11 at 3:35 pm to
its either the Swar. or Zeiss for my next scope. Mid range, what is better/ better for the $?
Posted by HeadSlash
TEAM LIVE BADASS - St. GEORGE
Member since Aug 2006
55659 posts
Posted on 6/28/11 at 3:42 pm to
US Optics or Nightforce
Posted by faxis
La.
Member since Oct 2007
7773 posts
Posted on 6/28/11 at 3:48 pm to
If it's better than my Leupold Mark IV it's beyond the ability of my eyes to appreciate it.
Posted by nhassl1
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2008
1934 posts
Posted on 6/28/11 at 4:04 pm to
you saying anything better than a Leupold isnt worth it?
Posted by LSU_Lou
The Landmass between N.O & Mobile
Member since Jul 2005
2094 posts
Posted on 6/28/11 at 6:49 pm to
I'm sure they are nice scopes, but there are so many things I can spend that money on. I'm not shooting anything from a half-mile away anyways.
Posted by hehatedrew
New Zealand
Member since Oct 2009
25504 posts
Posted on 6/28/11 at 6:51 pm to
If hunting is important to you, and you have the money to spend on it, I'm all for it. I actually like Leica a lot...
Posted by Rebman601
Tejas
Member since May 2010
2689 posts
Posted on 6/28/11 at 7:30 pm to
Hunting being important to a person has zero to do with it IMO. A $3,000 scope won't allow me to kill any more deer than a $300 scope. Actually the majority of deer that I've killed I shot while using a $150 Simmons scope, not once did the scope cause me to lose a deer. If you have the money, buy a $300 leupold and a muzzleloader hunt in Kansas or Illinois instead of a really expensive scope.

If it's just for shooting then I think you can spend a little more for quality glass if you're shooting 800+ yards, but I still wouldn't spend more than $600 or so.
Posted by Choirboy
On your property
Member since Aug 2010
10779 posts
Posted on 6/28/11 at 8:45 pm to
No matter what you buy there is always something better.
Posted by Purple Spoon
Hoth
Member since Feb 2005
20712 posts
Posted on 6/28/11 at 8:47 pm to
Someone who has shot out of a 2000 scope tell me this, what is the real difference between that 2000$ one and a 60$ Bushnll.

Im asking cause I dont know.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
71857 posts
Posted on 6/28/11 at 8:47 pm to
I learned one thing the hard way:

Never look through a scope you can't afford.
Posted by 4LSU2
Member since Dec 2009
38013 posts
Posted on 6/28/11 at 9:06 pm to
quote:

No matter what you buy there is always something better.


Well played, Sir. This is sig quote material, IMO.
Posted by INFIDEL
The couch
Member since Aug 2006
16199 posts
Posted on 6/28/11 at 9:15 pm to
quote:

Nightforce


I am liking these.

ONe thing everyone needs to understand is this. There are two different kinds of people on here. One kind is gonna be fine with an off the shelf rifle, factory ammo and a mid range scope. They will kill anything and everything the rest of us do. There is nothing wrong with this AT ALL. It's probably the best way to approach hunting. Then you have the rest of us. We buy rifles capable of shooting a mile with optics that out see what the rifle can shoot. We reload ammo that ends up costing twice what factory premium ammo costs. We do it because we cant stand "good enough". I am just getting into that group. Mostly because I am just getting to the point i can afford it somewhat (and thats debatable).
Posted by nhassl1
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2008
1934 posts
Posted on 6/28/11 at 9:21 pm to
"Never look through a scope you can't afford." Very true! That's the only reason I'm looking at getting one. But I have to say, the big deer come out right before dark and you're not gonna get your shot with a pos scope. Is a $3k scope necessary. That's debatale, but I sure as hell wouldnt want a $150 pos on top of my rifle when I see the buck of a lifetime.
Posted by Boats n Hose
NOLA
Member since Apr 2011
37248 posts
Posted on 6/28/11 at 9:23 pm to
Only issue I ever had with my Simmons is that I'd like it to pull in more light. My dad bought a nikon buckmaster and I really like it, I'll probably get one for my gun eventually. But I can't justify spending much more than that on a scope.
Posted by WAR TIGER
Death Valley
Member since Oct 2005
4282 posts
Posted on 6/28/11 at 9:31 pm to
I own zeiss and a z5.
Great scopes. I like the z5 a little more.


One of the best kept secrets for good quality/affordable scopes is........

:wartigerwhispers: "Sightron"

I love these scopes!!
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram