- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Pryor v. Ridley v. CAM
Posted on 12/23/10 at 8:40 pm
Posted on 12/23/10 at 8:40 pm
Pryor admits to unauthorized contact-to play in Sugar bowl. Ridley apparently falsely accused-not allowed to play in Cotton Bowl. CAM father found to have asked for $$$-CAM plays in BCSNC game. Where is the justice and outrage?
12
Posted on 12/23/10 at 8:41 pm to MustWin
Pryor and Cam are marquis players who will bring viewers to their respective bowl games.
Posted on 12/23/10 at 8:42 pm to RogerTheShrubber
ib4ncaahateslsu
Posted on 12/23/10 at 8:42 pm to MustWin
No justice plenty of outrage. Just teaching parents to ask for the money up front. That way the kids won't think outside the box to make the money they need.
I mean come on Cam was thinking of his future and his family. Pryor and Co were just trying to get by, punks.
I mean come on Cam was thinking of his future and his family. Pryor and Co were just trying to get by, punks.
Posted on 12/23/10 at 8:43 pm to MustWin
quote:
Ridley apparently falsely accused
Link please? And no, unsubstantiated rumor/opinion threads on TD don't count.
Posted on 12/23/10 at 8:48 pm to MustWin
There is no proof whatsoever that Ridley was falsely accused. Just because a poster claims this is what he heard, doesn't mean that it is true. PERIOD.
Outside of that, it should be more of a concern that academic fraud by Cam Newton was ignored more than anything.
Outside of that, it should be more of a concern that academic fraud by Cam Newton was ignored more than anything.
Posted on 12/23/10 at 9:12 pm to MustWin
quote:
Ridley apparently falsely accused
=
Cam had no clue.
Your better than this.
Posted on 12/23/10 at 9:18 pm to MustWin
quote:
Pryor admits to unauthorized contact-to play in Sugar bowl. Ridley apparently falsely accused-not allowed to play in Cotton Bowl. CAM father found to have asked for $$$-CAM plays in BCSNC game. Where is the justice and outrage?
I think its fair to say the NCAA image has taken a beating the past few months...after showing some teeth when it went after the Trojans the NCAA for some reason has turned into paper tigers now lately.....soft as baby s**t basically. The Cam and Pryor rulings are all about the $$$$$$.
College athletics will never be the same for me again
Posted on 12/23/10 at 9:24 pm to MrBiriwa
quote:
College athletics will never be the same for me again
Reluctantly I concur. This is why the 4 super conferences need to happen, get the power (TV money) and tell the NCAA to get bent. Even the mighty SEC has to bend to them b/c of favorable rulings past and now present. 4 super conferences could get the power and break up the benign NCAA.
This post was edited on 12/23/10 at 9:27 pm
Posted on 12/23/10 at 10:29 pm to MustWin
It's not who you know, but who you blow. 
Posted on 12/23/10 at 10:44 pm to MustWin
quote:
Pryor admits to unauthorized contact-to play in Sugar bowl.
And not the first 5 games of 2011.
Posted on 12/23/10 at 10:48 pm to MustWin
quote:
Ridley apparently falsely accused
Ridely, himself, stated, he is sorry for putting himself in a compromising situation.
Posted on 12/24/10 at 12:09 am to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
putting himself in a compromising situation.
How would you classify the following in terms of "Level of Compromising":
a) Having a cheat-sheet in your pocket... but not using it (throwing it away after the class).
b) You know that the teacher is prone to recycling tests... So you talk to somebody who has taken the test before and you ask what is on it (not specifics - just areas of emphasis, for example)
Just curious.
Posted on 12/24/10 at 1:31 am to yurintroubl
Still curious.
Posted on 12/24/10 at 1:37 am to yurintroubl
Still curious?
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight...
No harm in that I guess. Simply asking someone what is on a test is not cheating (especially since there is no proof you asked.)
quote:
Having a cheat-sheet in your pocket... but not using it (throwing it away after the class).
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight...
quote:
b) You know that the teacher is prone to recycling tests... So you talk to somebody who has taken the test before and you ask what is on it (not specifics - just areas of emphasis, for example)
No harm in that I guess. Simply asking someone what is on a test is not cheating (especially since there is no proof you asked.)
Posted on 12/24/10 at 1:45 am to PurpleGoldTiger
NCAA=CORRUPT and only care about making money for themselves. They don't want the player to have any money God forbid
Posted on 12/24/10 at 1:52 am to MustWin
Ridley committed academic fraud
Pryor didn't
academic fraud is more serious
Pryor didn't
academic fraud is more serious
Posted on 12/24/10 at 1:53 am to yurintroubl
quote:you'd probably believe anything your heros tell you
Just curious.
Posted on 12/24/10 at 2:08 am to MustWin
Mark May had some pretty harsh words for the NCAA
Posted on 12/24/10 at 3:39 am to Ford Frenzy
quote:
you'd probably believe anything your heros tell you
I believe you probably presume too much.
FWIW - I don't have any heroes except for my younger sister (and that's not a story I plan on sharing here).
I was simply curious as to what LSUTANGERINE's thoughts were regarding where the line is drawn in regards to the 2 situations I posed (since his viewpoint is that of a teacher/administrator, not a student).
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News