- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
An undefeated SEC isn't guaranteed BCS championship game.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 8:58 am
Posted on 10/18/10 at 8:58 am
Not yet. People need to remember Auburn 2004. The voters in the harris and coaches seem to be doing the same thing they were doing during 2004. Flexing their guns to make sure an SEC doesn't go. We're already hearing espn say the SEC is weak this year. As long as Les keeps playing around with JJ we won't get any favor on the voting either.
Two people they'll send first: Oklahoma and Oregon
Two people they'll send first: Oklahoma and Oregon
This post was edited on 10/18/10 at 8:59 am
13
Posted on 10/18/10 at 8:59 am to EricB
Auburn in 2004 won a lot more convincingly than this years LSU team.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 9:02 am to BabyTac
Dude you're bat shite crazy. 
An Undefeated SEC team is a lock for the BCS NC. Too many good teams and games left to play NOT to move up. Also care to look at the SEC track record in that game.
An Undefeated SEC team is a lock for the BCS NC. Too many good teams and games left to play NOT to move up. Also care to look at the SEC track record in that game.Posted on 10/18/10 at 9:03 am to EricB
the key is LSU is already #1 in 2 of the computers...that should only get stronger if they beat Auburn, Bama and Arky. A long ways to go though, I wouldn't be surprised if Boise and TCU were the only unbeatens left at the end of the year.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 9:05 am to fabtigers
I agree. Besides did they change the method of picking the bcs after that year. Because if I remember correctly there was another team that coulda gotten in that year too
Posted on 10/18/10 at 9:05 am to EricB
If an undefeated SEC team gets left out this year then no one will take the game or the system seriously.
It was somewhat understandable in 2004 because USC was such a dominant team that year.
There is no 2004 USC type of team out there right now that would make people forget about an undefeated SEC team.
It was somewhat understandable in 2004 because USC was such a dominant team that year.
There is no 2004 USC type of team out there right now that would make people forget about an undefeated SEC team.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 9:05 am to fabtigers
Fab is correct. Undefeated SEC is a guarantee. Even a SEC- one defeated team is a possibility with the SEC's SOS.
Just too soon to say much. LSU's chances are centered around this weekend.
Just too soon to say much. LSU's chances are centered around this weekend.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 9:05 am to EricB
If LSU goes undefeated, would't you be happy with beating TCU or Boise in the Sugar?
After all, its not like LSU crushed UT.
If the shoe were on the other foot and Oregon beats Oregon State on a re-do with 13 men on the field, would you consider that "beating" Oregon State?
I think LSU would have its hands full with Boise or TCU.
I doubt Oregon makes it all the way thru, just like Oregon fans doubt we will beat auburn, bama, and arkies.
After all, its not like LSU crushed UT.
If the shoe were on the other foot and Oregon beats Oregon State on a re-do with 13 men on the field, would you consider that "beating" Oregon State?
I think LSU would have its hands full with Boise or TCU.
I doubt Oregon makes it all the way thru, just like Oregon fans doubt we will beat auburn, bama, and arkies.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 9:07 am to EricB
2006-2007-2008-2009
I don't think they can prevent the SEC champ, even if it is Vandy, from playing in the Title game.
I don't think they can prevent the SEC champ, even if it is Vandy, from playing in the Title game.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 9:08 am to EricB
quote:
An undefeated SEC isn't guaranteed BCS championship game
This only applies to Auburn!
Other SEC teams can lose one or even two and still get in!
This post was edited on 10/18/10 at 9:09 am
Posted on 10/18/10 at 9:09 am to fabtigers
I don't see 3 teams from any other conf in the top ten. How is that weak? :shrug:
Posted on 10/18/10 at 9:10 am to EricB
quote:Auburn 2004 is one of several reasons that an undefeated SEC team will never be left out again
An undefeated SEC isn't guaranteed BCS championship game.
Not yet. People need to remember Auburn 2004.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 9:10 am to CalTiger
Undefeated SEC team is guaranteed BCSNCG. They won't make the same mistake twice with the SEC. That's why it is so good playing in this conference. it doesn't matter where you start or what your ranking is. If you navigate the SEC and come out undefeated, you're playing for the crystal ball.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 9:11 am to jeffsdad
Sec winner is a lock for a Bcs title shot!!!! 
Posted on 10/18/10 at 9:11 am to EricB
quote:No, they really don't.
People need to remember Auburn 2004
Posted on 10/18/10 at 9:12 am to Powerman
quote:
It was somewhat understandable in 2004 because USC was such a dominant team that year.
Tthe SEC has won the title almost every year in the last decade. Humans will bump an undefeated SEC team every time. No way an undefeated team from SEC gets left out. Look at the remaining games for each team.
But Oklahoma is going to lose anyway.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 9:12 am to ottothewise
quote:Proof you never played sports. Everything counts and rules and judgement calls are part of the game. Oh, and there is only 1 winner.
If the shoe were on the other foot and Oregon beats Oregon State on a re-do with 13 men on the field, would you consider that "beating" Oregon State?
Posted on 10/18/10 at 9:14 am to XbengalTiger
because the east is beating the shite out of one another and not one is standing out in the top ten, it will be highly likely that the an undefeated sec team will not jump oregon/oklahoma.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 9:16 am to AlxTgr
The SEC was much different back in 2004. We are much improved and have much more depth than we did back then. Heck, just look at the west and that should tell you something. I truly think a sec west team with one loss would make it to the NC game.
Posted on 10/18/10 at 9:19 am to tigerdup07
quote:
tigerdup07
quote:
it will be highly likely that the an undefeated sec team will not jump oregon/oklahoma.
LSUMatt disagrees.......
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News