- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

West Virginia's 3-3-5 Defense
Posted on 9/22/10 at 1:59 pm
Posted on 9/22/10 at 1:59 pm
Why not just run the ball down their throat? We know their defensive line is undersized compared to ours and most SEC-quality lines. Does this not leave them vulnerable to the power running game?
Posted on 9/22/10 at 2:00 pm to genuineLSUtiger
quote:
Why not just run the ball down their throat?
That seems to be the gameplan against solid defenses, so I don't see why that will change this weekend.
Posted on 9/22/10 at 2:01 pm to genuineLSUtiger
i dont think we have much of a choice seeing as how we really are no threat to throw it.
Posted on 9/22/10 at 2:02 pm to genuineLSUtiger
I expect us to run about 65% of the time against them. I think Ridly will be getting a workout.
Posted on 9/22/10 at 2:02 pm to Korkstand
quote:
run the ball down their throat
If we do this can we pleeeeeeeeeeeeease use play action more.
I think we only used it three times against MSU.
Posted on 9/22/10 at 2:03 pm to Powerman
quote:
I think Ridly will be getting tired by the half and have 120+ yards.
Posted on 9/22/10 at 2:08 pm to Korkstand
quote:
That seems to be the gameplan against solid defenses, so I don't see why that will change this weekend.
Exactly. They could line up in a nine-man front and the gameplan would still be run first. Having watched them a bit this year, this will be the best line and running game they will have faced so I do not believe they maintain their lofty rush defense numbers this week. If JJ can make accurate throws( and the guys hold on to the ball) the WVU secondary cannot cover the three amigos.
Posted on 9/22/10 at 2:08 pm to Steauxn
3-3-5 is not as bad against the run as you may think.
Posted on 9/22/10 at 2:09 pm to HARRY3740
Don't let Crowton overthink this. He may decide to air it out.
Posted on 9/22/10 at 2:11 pm to HARRY3740
quote:
3-3-5 is not as bad against the run as you may think
the scheme isnt what I'm excited about, its our guys' talent.....and hopefully they execute the way that we know they can.
Posted on 9/22/10 at 2:15 pm to HARRY3740
quote:
3-3-5 is not as bad against the run as you may think.
But it's not as good as a 4-3 against power running. Sure you'll have a little more speed out there, but what's the point if they can't tackle?
Posted on 9/22/10 at 3:11 pm to DrTyger
quote:
If we do this can we pleeeeeeeeeeeeease use play action more.
I think we only used it three times against MSU.
I don't remember seeing it that many times.
quote:
3-3-5 is not as bad against the run as you may think.
I'd like to see Ridley, Gore, Ware and Ford pound on the DBs to soften them up for Shepard and the passing game.
Posted on 9/22/10 at 3:15 pm to MoreOrLes
quote:
i dont think we have much of a choice seeing as how we really are no threat to throw it.
total bs, from an obviously intellectually challenged individual that can't see the bigger picture. LSU and jefferson have had nice passing days in the past and will again. Your post saying they don't have that capability reflects your intelligence.
Posted on 9/22/10 at 3:21 pm to AntiAntiTiger
quote:
Your post saying they don't have that capability reflects your intelligence.
I think it reflects his frustration, not his intelligence. And he's not the only fan that feels this way.
Posted on 9/22/10 at 3:27 pm to AntiAntiTiger
Really??? I guess we shall find out! I just hope ground game is workin cause if we have to depend on passing we might be in trouble! Run Shep Run!
Posted on 9/22/10 at 3:27 pm to genuineLSUtiger
Because the modern 3-3-5 is really like a modern 3-4 with a safety playing OLB...
and the Modern 3-4 is really like the old 4-3 with a "rush linebacker" playing a stand up DE...
There will still be 7-8 "in the box"; It's not like there are 3 DL and cloud coverage the whole game.
and the Modern 3-4 is really like the old 4-3 with a "rush linebacker" playing a stand up DE...
There will still be 7-8 "in the box"; It's not like there are 3 DL and cloud coverage the whole game.
Posted on 9/22/10 at 3:31 pm to genuineLSUtiger
quote:
Why not just run the ball down their throat?
Im sure we will
Posted on 9/22/10 at 3:34 pm to CountryVolFan
quote:
Because the modern 3-3-5 is really like a modern 3-4 with a safety playing OLB...
and the Modern 3-4 is really like the old 4-3 with a "rush linebacker" playing a stand up DE...
So what you're saying is the 3-3-5 is really just like a 4-3, except you have one undersized DE and one undersized linebacker?
Posted on 9/22/10 at 3:41 pm to Korkstand
Posted on 9/22/10 at 3:57 pm to LSUthrilla
quote:
i think thats what hes saying....
I thought so. All that says to me is they don't have guys with size that are also athletic, so they take the lesser of two evils and play the undersized guys with speed instead of the big slow ones.
This whole scheme just screams "bend-don't-break" to me, but when you're 20 pounds light across the board, you'll get bent all the way to the endzone.
Popular
Back to top

5






