- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

LSU was snake-bitten last year.
Posted on 6/30/10 at 9:37 am
Posted on 6/30/10 at 9:37 am
Here's why I think LSU was snake-bitten...
PP interception against Bama...
Onside kick against Ole Miss: PP's right toe could not have been out by more than 2".
Injuries to JJ, Charles Scott, and KW occurred at critical times in ball games. Nobody can tell me that there isn't a difference between your first string RB and your third string.
Lafell continued to drop passes last year...
Offensive PI against Florida. Yes, "Nuts" says we still would have lost that game 6-3, but I think your play-calling has to change if your down 3 as opposed to 10.
Bad weather against Penn State. That field played right into the hands of Penn State. It negated our speed and quickness, and let Penn State use their size.
It just seemed like the other team, no matter who we were playing, had the right play called at exactly the right time(See Patrick Peterson against Bama).
I don't think that trend can continue this year. The more I look at last year, the more excited I get about this upcoming year.
Posted on 6/30/10 at 9:38 am to AUmember
good positive post!!!!
negatigers will show up soon saying we'll lose 6-8 games this season
negatigers will show up soon saying we'll lose 6-8 games this season
Posted on 6/30/10 at 9:39 am to AUmember
So OL play and the QB play were less important than all of those?
I completely agree with this
quote:
It just seemed like the other team, no matter who we were playing, had the right play called at exactly the right time(See Patrick Peterson against Bama).
I completely agree with this
Posted on 6/30/10 at 9:39 am to AUmember
Good post and i agree. Getting very pumped.
Posted on 6/30/10 at 9:42 am to AUmember
Que the bashers in 3,2,1...
Posted on 6/30/10 at 9:43 am to athletemed
All of our good luck from 2007 was paid back over the last 2 years...........We are even now.
Look out!
Look out!
Posted on 6/30/10 at 9:44 am to Sid in Lakeshore
You maybe be onto something with that Sid
Posted on 6/30/10 at 9:50 am to AUmember
TOO FAR!
So now we are calling Les a SNAKE?
Come on, he's a good man.
So now we are calling Les a SNAKE?
Come on, he's a good man.
Posted on 6/30/10 at 9:55 am to Lacour
Good and bad breaks are part of the game. We lost because we didn't execute and the teams that beat us did.
Posted on 6/30/10 at 9:55 am to TigerTatorTots
quote:
Que the bashers in 3,2,1...
And away we go!!!!!!!!!!
Posted on 6/30/10 at 10:01 am to AUmember
quote:
Lafell continued to drop passes last year...
That's not bad luck.
Posted on 6/30/10 at 10:14 am to AUmember
Good post and I agree. It's not like we got our asses kicked. The Tigers could have won every game we lost last year. This is why I am very hopeful for this year.

Posted on 6/30/10 at 10:14 am to MFV
quote:
Good and bad breaks are part of the game. We lost because we didn't execute and the teams that beat us did.
+1
Posted on 6/30/10 at 10:21 am to JYD
I like the point about all of the karma going our way in 2007.....it just seemed like we couldn't be kept out of the Superdome at the end of that season (even with 2 losses, unheard of).
Two years of making up for that, perhaps this is where it all turns around. I'm in
Two years of making up for that, perhaps this is where it all turns around. I'm in
Posted on 6/30/10 at 10:28 am to AUmember
I hope you're right. And you can call me a nega-tiger if you'd like, but the "luck" argument cuts both ways.
Miss State: 30-26 win.
required goal line stand (twice).
They ran all over us:
First downs: MSU 21 LSU 13
Rushing Yds: MSU 151 LSU 30
Total Off: MSU 364 LSU 264
Georgia:
Wacky late touchdown/penalty - not saying we didn't deserve the win, but there was definitely luck involved.
La Tech:
First downs: LaTech 23 LSU 15
Rushing Yds: LaTech 178 LSU 141
Total Off: LaTech 322 LSU 246
Bottom line: The reason we have so many close games is because we are neither a well-prepared nor or well-disciplined team. It's simple: We usually have superior talent, but this hasn't translated to a superior team.
Miss State: 30-26 win.
required goal line stand (twice).
They ran all over us:
First downs: MSU 21 LSU 13
Rushing Yds: MSU 151 LSU 30
Total Off: MSU 364 LSU 264
Georgia:
Wacky late touchdown/penalty - not saying we didn't deserve the win, but there was definitely luck involved.
La Tech:
First downs: LaTech 23 LSU 15
Rushing Yds: LaTech 178 LSU 141
Total Off: LaTech 322 LSU 246
Bottom line: The reason we have so many close games is because we are neither a well-prepared nor or well-disciplined team. It's simple: We usually have superior talent, but this hasn't translated to a superior team.
This post was edited on 6/30/10 at 10:32 am
Posted on 6/30/10 at 10:33 am to cggeaxtigers
You will be hated for bring those true statements to the discussion.
Posted on 6/30/10 at 10:35 am to cggeaxtigers
quote:
The reason we have so many close games is because we are neither a well-prepared nor or well-disciplined team. It's simple: We usually have superior talent, but this hasn't translated to a superior team.
i agree
oh, and the "negatiger" thing is so dumb and played out.
Posted on 6/30/10 at 10:40 am to Boh
Popular
Back to top

24









