Started By
Message
locked post

Winners? Losers?

Posted on 6/14/10 at 7:23 pm
Posted by JEAUXBLEAUX
Bayonne, NJ
Member since May 2006
55374 posts
Posted on 6/14/10 at 7:23 pm
Winner Texas - Everybody hated them anyway
Baylor - Still in a BCS Conference
Kansas and Kassas State see above
Nebraska - Away from texas but needs to deal with Ohio State and Michigan

Loser A and M Still a sad number 2 afte all these years
Missouri- Still want out to the Big Ten?
Posted by kclsufan
Show Me
Member since Jun 2008
12099 posts
Posted on 6/14/10 at 7:25 pm to
Mega-loser-PAthetiC-10
This post was edited on 6/14/10 at 7:25 pm
Posted by DarkHornet
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Nov 2003
232 posts
Posted on 6/14/10 at 7:29 pm to
On a team by team basis:

Winners:
Texas (they get their money)
Baylor, Kansas, Kansas State, Missouri
Utah (now they should be invited to the Pac 10)
Nebraska (great fit in the Big 10)

Losers:
Oklahoma State, Texas A&M, and Oklahoma (still on Texas' jock)
Colorado (now they'll owe the buyout)

Conference Winners:
Big 10 (Nebraska is a solid addition)
SEC (They prevented the Pac 10 Super Conference)
ACC & Big East (for the moment they are safe from raids)

Losers:
Pac 10 (They wanted the home run. They'll have to settle for a single)
Big XII (They're prolonging the inevitable)
This post was edited on 6/14/10 at 7:46 pm
Posted by ULQQKED
I LOVE anal sex in my anus.
Member since Aug 2009
4063 posts
Posted on 6/14/10 at 7:31 pm to
quote:

Nebraska (great fit in the Pac 10



Posted by ULMaggie
Member since Jun 2010
133 posts
Posted on 6/14/10 at 7:31 pm to
I know it's a market, but Colorado is a fielders choice at best...

Losing them actually increased the Big XII's per team value from what I've heard...

Posted by ULQQKED
I LOVE anal sex in my anus.
Member since Aug 2009
4063 posts
Posted on 6/14/10 at 7:32 pm to
HUGE winner is the SEC, we new daddy is just like the old daddy.
Posted by derekinne
Afghanistan
Member since Jan 2009
5895 posts
Posted on 6/14/10 at 7:37 pm to
Winners:

Kansas basketball program.
Nebraska(just a great fit with the Big 10 IMO)
Missouri. Could be the team to beat in the North now pretty much every year.

Losers:

Texas. The Big 12 was weak enough, and now the Longhorns lost pretty much their one solid competition from the North.
Missouri. A lot of the expansion talks started with them, and now they're stuck in the same place they started.
Posted by DocBugbear
Arlington, Texas
Member since Mar 2008
8139 posts
Posted on 6/14/10 at 7:41 pm to
Biggest Loser: Fox Sports (paying ~$165M for what is essentially 2 significant football games, UT/OU and UT/TAMU)
Posted by nvasil1
Hellinois
Member since Oct 2009
17456 posts
Posted on 6/14/10 at 7:42 pm to
quote:

I know it's a market, but Colorado is a fielders choice at best...

Losing them actually increased the Big XII's per team value from what I've heard...


Just checked out the CU forum on netbuffs.com and they seem to be loving the fact that Texas and co. aren't joining the Pac-10. I figured they'd be freaking out. Now they owe the buyout money and they do nothing but water down an already weak conference where the only elite program just got arse-rammed by the NCAA.
Posted by derekinne
Afghanistan
Member since Jan 2009
5895 posts
Posted on 6/14/10 at 7:43 pm to
quote:


Biggest Loser: Fox Sports (paying ~$165M for what is essentially 2 significant football games, UT/OU and UT/TAMU)


Posted by catholictigerfan
Member since Oct 2009
59615 posts
Posted on 6/14/10 at 7:59 pm to
quote:

Biggest Loser: Fox Sports (paying ~$165M for what is essentially 1 significant football game , UT/OU)


FIFY
This post was edited on 6/14/10 at 8:00 pm
Posted by arrakis
Member since Nov 2008
21168 posts
Posted on 6/14/10 at 8:21 pm to
quote:

Baylor - Still in a BCS Conference

Just received an email from a buddy of mine that played for Baylor back in the '70's. He's a BIG Baylor supporter and said:
"Thank goodness we weren't left out in the cold, but I hate we owe it those cow skull cocksuckers."

Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 6/14/10 at 8:30 pm to
Texas = the biggest winner.......

Big X = winner.....

SEC = not a loser......

All else = Losers......FACTS!
Posted by arrakis
Member since Nov 2008
21168 posts
Posted on 6/14/10 at 8:33 pm to
quote:

SEC = not a loser......


SEC = Winner
Slive has done a fantastic job for the conference.
Posted by Methuselah
On da Riva
Member since Jan 2005
23350 posts
Posted on 6/14/10 at 8:33 pm to
Biggest loser has to be the PAC 10.

Biggest winner has to be Baylor and the Kansas schools and whatever other little schools I can't quite remember the names of that are in the Big 12.

A&M - maybe a wash. I think they would have benefited more from the SEC but apparently this was their choice. And if they get more $$ then they were they beneift that way.

SEC - held pat but could have benefited from A&M and VaTech IMHO so maybe a small loss in what looked like it could have been.

Big 10 a moderate winner in that they get to expand with a solid Nebraska team with a great football following and a team which seams to be on the upswing.

Nebraska is a winner just by getting out of the purgatory that is the Big 12 north.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram