- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
So will the pac 10 finally have a conference championship??
Posted on 6/11/10 at 3:35 pm
Posted on 6/11/10 at 3:35 pm
Assuming all this goes down and they get more teams.
7
Posted on 6/11/10 at 3:36 pm to GeauxFurniss
Not sure how it will work but heard they are trying to get two automatics to the BCS.
Posted on 6/11/10 at 3:36 pm to GeauxFurniss
By default they have to IMHO...
Posted on 6/11/10 at 3:36 pm to GeauxFurniss
they are still saying no
that they are against conf championship and think that the regular season winner from both divisions should get automatic bcs births
that they are against conf championship and think that the regular season winner from both divisions should get automatic bcs births
Posted on 6/11/10 at 3:37 pm to MJM
Man thats bs!I hate this auto bid stuff for the better of the conferences.
Posted on 6/11/10 at 3:38 pm to MJM
Then how will they decide who goes to their precious rose bowl? I'm pretty sure with 16 teams you can have several finish tied for #1 with the same record.
Posted on 6/11/10 at 3:39 pm to GeauxFurniss
If it's all about the $$$, then they would have to be exploring that option.
Plus, with a twelve team schedule, you aren't even going to come close to a complete round robin, so you need some way of establishing a championship game.
Plus, with a twelve team schedule, you aren't even going to come close to a complete round robin, so you need some way of establishing a championship game.
Posted on 6/11/10 at 3:39 pm to GeauxFurniss
It's still not clear. It depends on how BCS berths end up getting passed out
If they do, I'm sure it would rotate between Dallas and the Rose Bowl though. It's too bad UNLV's stadium sucks because a Pac-16 title game in Vegas every year would be badass
If they do, I'm sure it would rotate between Dallas and the Rose Bowl though. It's too bad UNLV's stadium sucks because a Pac-16 title game in Vegas every year would be badass
Posted on 6/11/10 at 3:40 pm to WONTONGO
I've really always hated this when penn st,mich,osu,oregon,usc automaticly get to go to the same bowls and we have to play an extra game same with the big 12.Posted on 6/11/10 at 3:52 pm to GeauxFurniss
They are still avoiding this. They will have two 8 team divisions. The PAC-16 will fight to have the winners of the two divisions both get automatic BCS bids (one of the bids being the Big 12's old spot). This is all rumored.
Like said before this will, with out a doubt, cause problems with two teams wanting to go to the rose bowl.
Like said before this will, with out a doubt, cause problems with two teams wanting to go to the rose bowl.
This post was edited on 6/11/10 at 3:54 pm
Posted on 6/11/10 at 3:53 pm to fat mike eats it
they'll want one to the Rose Bowl and one to the MNCG.
like the SEC does with Sugar/NCG
like the SEC does with Sugar/NCG
This post was edited on 6/11/10 at 3:54 pm
Posted on 6/11/10 at 3:54 pm to fat mike eats it
Wonder how an SEC expansion would effect this. If we expand it would limit the ability of the Pac to gain that additional BCS automatic.
Posted on 6/11/10 at 3:56 pm to Amp4LSU
Well I am sure if one team goes to the NCG then the PAC-16 will still want the two other automatic bids; just as any major conf. wants now.
I would like to think if UT and A&M came to the SEC this would put a halt to the PAC-16 getting the current Big 12's BCS bid.
I would like to think if UT and A&M came to the SEC this would put a halt to the PAC-16 getting the current Big 12's BCS bid.
This post was edited on 6/11/10 at 4:00 pm
Posted on 6/11/10 at 4:00 pm to GeauxFurniss
doesn't sound like it would change much. Kind of like two small conferences under one banner. No CCG, just the two "divisional champs" getting a BCS bid.
Posted on 6/11/10 at 4:03 pm to RogerTheShrubber
pretty different from the SEC tho - we have a habit of sending the runner up to our fifth best bowl tie in
Posted on 6/11/10 at 4:05 pm to RogerTheShrubber
That also means two pieces of the BCS money-pie. That does not sit so well with other conferences that have a championship game.
Posted on 6/11/10 at 4:06 pm to molsusports
quote:
pretty different from the SEC tho - we have a habit of sending the runner up to our fifth best bowl tie in
True. Just sounds like the B12 lost NU, shed its lesser participants and agreed to let its Texas and Okie schools fight it out for the Fiesta. Don't think it will change a lot.
Posted on 6/11/10 at 4:14 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Money is the difference. The PAC-# will be getting twice as much as the SEC.
Posted on 6/11/10 at 4:27 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
doesn't sound like it would change much. Kind of like two small conferences under one banner. No CCG, just the two "divisional champs" getting a BCS bid.
That's retarded. Why even be in the same conference if you can't have a conference champ every year.
Posted on 6/11/10 at 7:01 pm to WONTONGO
It would be beyond crazy to award to bids to the east and west reg season champs.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News