Started By
Message
locked post

So is BP done with the well until the relief wells are online ?

Posted on 6/5/10 at 1:44 pm
Posted by Zilla
Member since Jul 2005
10640 posts
Posted on 6/5/10 at 1:44 pm
that's it huh ?
Posted by paulie
NOLA
Member since Dec 2007
675 posts
Posted on 6/5/10 at 1:49 pm to
No. They plan on continuing to optimize the capture of the oil using the top hat to the Enterprise vessel on the surface and also rig up lines to the choke / kill ports on the BOP to siphon to the Q4000 vessel on the surface.
Posted by Zilla
Member since Jul 2005
10640 posts
Posted on 6/5/10 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

optimize the capture of the oil


how ?
Posted by baytiger
Boston
Member since Dec 2007
46978 posts
Posted on 6/5/10 at 1:57 pm to
quote:


how ?


figuring out how to suck up just enough oil to not make it obvious that the 12-19000 estimate is another lowball figure
Posted by Ray Ray Rodman
Florida
Member since Mar 2005
17654 posts
Posted on 6/5/10 at 2:02 pm to
They sure can make sure they can suck any oil they can use but sure are having a hard time cleaning up the oil that is already spilled.

frick BP! Hope they rot in hell.
Posted by Mudminnow
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2004
34200 posts
Posted on 6/5/10 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

frick BP! Hope they rot in hell.


Those comments wont sit well in here. Its a BP stronghold. Welcome aboard. Its refreshing to see a different opinion than BP is God and this is just a drop in the bucket oil spill.
Posted by paulie
NOLA
Member since Dec 2007
675 posts
Posted on 6/5/10 at 2:19 pm to
How? This is a modified version of what they are currently doing with a different "cap".

LINK

We also must keep in mind that they are proceeding cautiously probably for the safety of the crew on the Enterprise ship. More like taking small steps before they run. The leak rate may be more than what the Enterprise can handle (15,000 bbd) so there may be safety concerns over going to quickly and overwhelming the Enterprise. Just my best guesses though. Hopefully we get another technical update in the near future from that Kent Wells guy.
Posted by Mudminnow
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2004
34200 posts
Posted on 6/5/10 at 2:21 pm to
I thought the oil was being transferred to larger ships as it was coming into the enterprise for seperation?

Posted by Ray Ray Rodman
Florida
Member since Mar 2005
17654 posts
Posted on 6/5/10 at 2:27 pm to
I have a brother and nephew working security down there and they said more is being done to cover shite up than clean anything up.

Said they were given strict orders to not let anyone with a camera anywhere near.
Posted by paulie
NOLA
Member since Dec 2007
675 posts
Posted on 6/5/10 at 2:40 pm to
Mudminnow, yes they are probably going to offload the oil but they are probably concerned about the capacity to separate the oil / gas and the flare capacity. I don't have the details. Just on the board curious like everyone else. Wish they would tell us more though.
Posted by Mudminnow
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2004
34200 posts
Posted on 6/5/10 at 2:56 pm to
BP has said all along only 5,000 barrels was leaking a day. The govt and coastguard formed a panel of scientists and engineers and they agreed between 12,000 - 19,000 barrels/ day.

They are already sucking 6,000 barrels of oil/day and it still looks like a geyser down there. Its looking like this new estimate of 12-19K barrels may very well be an under estimate as well.

Has BP acknowledged their 5,000 barrel/ day estimate may have been flawed?
Posted by baytiger
Boston
Member since Dec 2007
46978 posts
Posted on 6/5/10 at 3:09 pm to
quote:


Has BP acknowledged their 5,000 barrel/ day estimate may have been flawed?


yeah, they're currently holding the position that it's "impossible" to estimate
Posted by LSU7096
Member since May 2004
2902 posts
Posted on 6/6/10 at 12:02 am to
Actually they may burn a large portion of the captured oil. Goal is to remove the oil from the water, not to capture it for resale.

You'll see the smoke clouds out there if they siphon is successful.

Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
56109 posts
Posted on 6/6/10 at 8:52 am to
quote:

Send Big Oil a Message
By sending Big Oil booster Blanche Lincoln packing. Vote Tuesday!
BigOilBlanche.com

Ads by Google


The wife and I will do our part Tues. to see that ole Blanche has to live out the rest of her life here in Ark. with the rest of us poor fools. Not voting against her because of big oil but because of her vote on health care. She even brags about her vote in one of her tv ads.
Posted by wilceaux
Austin, TX
Member since Apr 2004
12971 posts
Posted on 6/6/10 at 8:58 am to
quote:

Not voting against her because of big oil but because of her vote on health care. She even brags about her vote in one of her tv ads.


As well she should.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram