- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Sign Melancon's petition to the NFL - Who Dat
Posted on 1/29/10 at 2:02 pm
Posted on 1/29/10 at 2:02 pm
Charlie Melancon has a petition to the NFL to stop making a false claim for the words:" Who Dat"
Sign UP
Sign UP
8
Posted on 1/29/10 at 2:08 pm to kingfish
done
Posted on 1/29/10 at 2:09 pm to kingfish
Done
Posted on 1/29/10 at 2:19 pm to kingfish
total PR move
Posted on 1/29/10 at 2:24 pm to kingfish
So, who was the German, Melancon or Vitter?
Posted on 1/29/10 at 2:50 pm to Y.A. Tittle
Wow 2 La politicians using a hot topic to improve there likeability! No matter if PR or not these 2 guys have more of a shot a making something happen than 99% of us. So no matter if PR or BS it is pro NO Saints and i am for it!
Posted on 1/29/10 at 3:16 pm to kingfish
Done! Who Dat??
Posted on 1/29/10 at 4:10 pm to CajunBroussard
done
Posted on 1/29/10 at 4:12 pm to CajunBroussard
quote:
Or if your a Republican...
and this letter is actually going to commissioner
Why don't people just sign both and leave partisianship out of this...
Posted on 1/29/10 at 4:18 pm to kingfish
This is the dumbest story I've ever heard.
Normal people aren't allowed to use NFL properties for profit. What is so difficult to understand?
Are you guys seriously that stupid? It makes me so angry that we have a US Senator and Rep wasting their fricking time on this non issue.
Normal people aren't allowed to use NFL properties for profit. What is so difficult to understand?
Are you guys seriously that stupid? It makes me so angry that we have a US Senator and Rep wasting their fricking time on this non issue.
Posted on 1/29/10 at 4:25 pm to AlejandroInHouston
Guess I'm stupid...how is "Who Dat" NFL property??
Posted on 1/29/10 at 4:30 pm to blebru1
Wow. This can only help us in a close game in the 4th quarter, when Goodell et al, start calculating how much money they stand to make on "Super Bowl Champions" t-shirts. I realize the election is in November, but couldn't BOTH of these clowns wait until after the game to piss off the league office?
And, by the way, the NFL does not own "Who Dat." But if you're selling a black and gold shirt with "Who Dat" and a fleur de lis on it, it's a pretty clear case of copyright infirngement, and profiting from the team/league's success. Why isn't there any of this anti-corporation mentality when the big health care companies start putting on tea parties?
And, by the way, the NFL does not own "Who Dat." But if you're selling a black and gold shirt with "Who Dat" and a fleur de lis on it, it's a pretty clear case of copyright infirngement, and profiting from the team/league's success. Why isn't there any of this anti-corporation mentality when the big health care companies start putting on tea parties?
This post was edited on 1/29/10 at 4:31 pm
Posted on 1/29/10 at 4:31 pm to RockChalkTiger
Done
Posted on 1/29/10 at 4:35 pm to blebru1
apparently they own the copyright or trademark
Posted on 1/29/10 at 4:36 pm to RockChalkTiger
quote:
And, by the way, the NFL does not own "Who Dat." But if you're selling a black and gold shirt with "Who Dat" and a fleur de lis on it, it's a pretty clear case of copyright infirngement, and profiting from the team/league's success. Why isn't there any of this anti-corporation mentality when the big health care companies start putting on tea parties?
Maybe France can sue the NFL then.
anti-corporation mentality? damn hippie.
Posted on 1/29/10 at 4:36 pm to blebru1
quote:
Guess I'm stupid...how is "Who Dat" NFL property??
It's not "Who Dat" that is NFL property. It's using the Saints image and success to capitalize on profit. The NFL will always try to make money on this.
Obviously there were enough merchants selling Who Dat shirts that were Black and Gold and a fleur-de-lis that they said enough is enough. No one owns the word Saints either, but you put it on a black shirt with gold lettering and the NFL will want a cut. Plain and simple.
Posted on 1/29/10 at 4:38 pm to FanInLA
quote:
Done AND forwarded!!
+1
Posted on 1/29/10 at 4:38 pm to AlejandroInHouston
quote:
It makes me so angry that we have a US Senator and Rep wasting their fricking time on this non issue
are you kidding me? This is the perfect kind of issue they can take a stance on to pander to their constituents. People eat that shite right up. Like the douche bag politicians who threaten to sue the NCAA when their team gets left out of the BCS.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News