I don't know if this has been discussed yet, but did anyone else think we should have let them into the end zone with 2:45 left on the clock? We had 2 TOs and would have had time to work down field, down 6 or 7. That vs 2 pt game with 58 sec and a shitty track record of end game clock mngmnt. Which is a better situation?

Our D was gassed, they were running downhill, and we could have conserved clock and TO's. I think 1 min for a shot of getting in FG position in those conditions would be sketchy at best.

5 ...

Report Post

Posted by RummelTiger

Texas

Member since Aug 2004

90131 posts

Posted on 1/2/10 at 11:25 pm to LSUHSC-S T-Fanatic

So you'd prefer them to just quit?

Uh, no, thanks.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by dodgelsu09

Natchitoches, La

Member since May 2009

251 posts

Posted on 1/2/10 at 11:26 pm to LSUHSC-S T-Fanatic

thats A thought but with the field as bad as it was I would rather have kicker trying to win it for PSU.
And as for what LSU would have done their is no clue????

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by TJG210

New Orleans

Member since Aug 2006

28390 posts

Posted on 1/2/10 at 11:26 pm to LSUHSC-S T-Fanatic

Not with our offense, and their kicker from what the commentators were saying wasn't very good. In those field conditions nothing is a given, and they had bad snaps on field goals several times during the game.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Craig Ferguson

Member since Oct 2009

1568 posts

Posted on 1/2/10 at 11:44 pm to LSUHSC-S T-Fanatic

A field goal on that field no matter how close was no chip shot. If you hold them out of the endzone like we did, the kicker might have lost his footing on the sloppy field and blown the field goal.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by KingofZydeco

On da bayou

Member since Jul 2009

1001 posts

Posted on 1/3/10 at 2:10 am to LSUHSC-S T-Fanatic

we coulda donne that for moo state too right???