Started By
Message
locked post

You decide if the HIT was dirty. Slow motion at the end

Posted on 11/18/09 at 12:08 pm
Posted by TechDawg2007
Bawville
Member since Nov 2007
32277 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 12:08 pm
Posted by charlottetiger
Asheville, NC
Member since Nov 2007
7964 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 12:10 pm to
H2H
Posted by The312
I Live in The Three One Two
Member since Aug 2008
6967 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 12:11 pm to
There is absolutely no question whatsoever that Boyd led with his helmet. That is quintessential helmet to helmet contact on a completely defenseless receiver. He would have been fined and potentially suspended in the NFL.
Posted by Mindenfan
Minden
Member since Sep 2006
4803 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 12:12 pm to
Dirty!
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 12:13 pm to
Stupid b*stard. I hope he gets his sometime.
Posted by Covington
TD.com Premium Member
Member since Dec 2007
9414 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

HIT was dirty
Posted by Brendoni
Oklahoma City, Ok
Member since Apr 2009
21429 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 12:15 pm to
frick yeah it was dirty.
Posted by RockChalkTiger
A Little Bit South of Saskatoon
Member since May 2009
10693 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 12:15 pm to
Dirty. Went for the head + helmet to helmet contact.
Posted by BamaScoop
Panama City Beach, Florida
Member since May 2007
54644 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 12:20 pm to
Facemask to helmet, it was a clean hit. It looked terrible but it was a clean hit.
Posted by Zombie Tiger
Death Valley
Member since Oct 2009
437 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 12:34 pm to
I would not have called this a flaggable hit last year. But seeing the way they have called other hits like this this year, I definitely was expecting the flag when I saw it, even at full game speed
Posted by hoghunter
OverThere, US
Member since Jan 2007
1058 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 12:35 pm to
Its pretty sad that this is even in question.

ITS FOOTBALL! FOOTBALL IS A VIOLENT SPORT.

"defensless receiever" ???? What is the defensive players suppose to do. Wait until TT catches it and comes down and then ask him if he is ready to get hit?

Sheeesh, good thing these pussy rules werent in place 30 years ago or the hall of fame would be vacant about 50 spots. They wear helmets for a reason and the defensive player was clearly not using his as a weapon. Sigh....get them pink jerseys and flags if this was/is a big deal imo.
Posted by T1
Dallas, TX
Member since Dec 2006
3060 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 12:48 pm to
When I saw it live, I thought it was helmet to helmet. The replay shows that Boyd led with his forearms and the helmet to helmet was incidental. Clean hit. (and a very good one).
Posted by nEVERhappy
Geismar
Member since Sep 2009
353 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 12:50 pm to
WHO CARES, YOUR TEAM SUCKS
Posted by Archie Bengal Bunker
Member since Jun 2008
15520 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 12:57 pm to
I don't think it was so much helmet to helmet, as it was going for the head of a defenseless receiver. Whether or not he led with the helmet (which is debatable)... imo, there is no debating that he went for the receivers head.
Posted by philter
Member since Dec 2004
8967 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

Rules Changes 1. Player Safety. Helmet Crown and Defenseless Players (Rule 9-1-3). The committee has refined the rules regarding the use of the helmet as a weapon and the targeting of defenseless players. (The Points of Emphasis section of the NCAA Football Rules and Interpretations lists a number of examples of defenseless players.) Emphasis on these actions highlights concern about potentially debilitating injuries. It is now a foul when a player targets an opponent and initiates contact with the crown (top) of the helmet. This rule is intended primarily for the safety of the player who initiates the contact. It is also a foul if a player targets a defenseless opponent and initiates contact above the shoulders. Each of these is a personal foul and thus carries a 15-yard penalty.


2009 rule book (points of emphasis):
quote:

Intentional helmet-to-helmet contact is never legal, nor is any other blow directed toward an opponent’s head. Flagrant offenders shall be disqualified.


Specific examples of "Defenseless"
quote:

PROTECTION OF DEFENSELESS PLAYERS—In 2008, the committee
introduced a separate rule prohibiting initiating contact with and targeting a
defenseless opponent (Rule 9-1-3).

The following are situations in which defenseless players are susceptible to
serious injury:

• The quarterback moving down the line of scrimmage who has handed or
pitched the ball to a teammate, and then makes no attempt to participate
further in the play;
• The kicker who is in the act of kicking the ball, or who has not had a
reasonable length of time to regain his balance after the kick;
• The passer who is in the act of throwing the ball, or who has not had a
reasonable length of time to participate in the play again after releasing the
ball;
• The pass receiver whose concentration is on the ball;
• The pass receiver who has clearly relaxed when the pass is no longer
catchable;
• The kick receiver whose attention is on the downward flight of the ball;
• The kick receiver who has just touched the ball;
• The player who has relaxed once the ball has become dead; and
• The player who is obviously out of the play.


LINK


/argument
/thread
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
72037 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 1:33 pm to
meh, doesnt look like he was trying to go h2h. actually looks like helmets touch but he was pushing him at same time.

After watching it few more times i do think that would get called most of the time. i wouldnt say it was a dirty cheap shot or anything like that.
This post was edited on 11/18/09 at 1:35 pm
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

You decide if the HIT was dirty.


Dirty? No.

Illegal...without question.

He'd be $30,000 lighter this week if he was playing in the NFL...
Posted by Crumble
Planet LSU
Member since Jan 2006
2264 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

it was not a dirty hit



Do you, by any chance, work for the SEC?
Posted by LSUCouyon
ONTHELAKEATDELHI, La.
Member since Oct 2006
11330 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 2:10 pm to
The snap back of the receiver's head after the defender's HELMET hits it makes it obvious to anyone but an abject IDIOT that this was an illegal hit. Should have been a personal foul helmet-to-helmet.
Karma is a bitch. Defender better be watching his back. It played hell on the Auburn creep that tried to take out Dorsey.
Posted by makinskrilla
Lafayette, LA
Member since Jun 2009
9733 posts
Posted on 11/18/09 at 2:18 pm to
he launched and lead with the crown of his helmet.

that is the textbook dirty hit.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram