UGA = turnover machine

I've seen LSU against all 11 SEC Opponents...UGA is the only team I've never seen them beat...time for revenge!

Exactly

We match up extremely well with Georgia.

Their best running plays are stretch plays or short pitches to the backs and getting them to the perimeter.

If their is one thing this LSU defense, its the fact that they can RUN.

Georgia likes to take advantage of the fact that teams cant match up with AJ Green at the collegiate level.

But teams with a top level corner (OK State) are able to not put so much attention to Green.

Green only had 4 catches for 54 yards.

With our secondary, we physically matchup well with AJ, PP and CJ will hold down AJ, not shut him down, but hold him down.

Allowing our defense to force turnovers.

I say we force 4 turnovers and turn it over twice so a plus 2 margin in this game

Go in to Athens and get a 34-27 Win.

quote:

---

What is UGA's turn over margin?

---

-9. I think they've turned it over 3 times or more in each game. All that is a moot point if we don't capitalize though. We DID get the INT TD last week but outside of that we didn't do much. Getting 4 turnovers should have led to more than 16 offensive points.

quote:

---

We just have to capitalize on these turnovers this time!

---

Their were two legit turnovers, that we got 10 points off of vs MSU

The other two, Hawkins picks the ball of on our own 20 yd line, and Taylor picks one off inside our 20.

We capitalize on the good field position we had and PP obviously returning one for a TD.

That turnover, pts off TO's can be misleading sometimes.

You expect 6 every time we get a turnover inside our 20 yard line ?

I have no idea how to cover Green, as most defensive coordinators don't, but I would think that it would be a better idea to put Hawkins on him with Taylor giving Safety support, leaving Peterson to lock down their other WR and leave Chad Jones roaming the field to make the big hit.

While I'd love to see Peterson and Green battling all night, I don't know if that would be the smartest thing. Just as I don't think it would be smart to use our two best players in the secondary to cover one wide receiver.

quote:

---

This is true, but even if we can't capitalize, they do the defense off the field, which seems to be a problem otherwise.

---

IMO that just makes it look worse. We had 4 TOs and they were still on the field 86 plays.

quote:

---

This game will come down to this

---

we had 4-5 TOs versus a lesser team and was 4 inches away from losing

Turnovers and penalties will decide this close game.

Don't worry we always turn it over where it works for the other team ... We have had 44 points scored against us off of 10 turnovers ...