Started By
Message

re: Another myth bites the dust

Posted on 8/8/09 at 10:27 am to
Posted by Stromile Swift
Houston
Member since Sep 2003
43193 posts
Posted on 8/8/09 at 10:27 am to
quote:

He lost weight.


Wait, what? Did you just make this up or something?
Posted by hojo
St. Louis, MO
Member since Mar 2005
1366 posts
Posted on 8/8/09 at 10:37 am to
A fake, and thus a defensive read, is only valid if there's actually a chance in hell of the quarterback tucking and running with it. Fake all you want. If you're slow as Christmas and don't present an honest threat to run the defense doesn't have to make a read. It's really the definition of the option, except in Lee's case there is no qb run option.
Posted by RobbBobb
Matt Flynn, BCS MVP
Member since Feb 2007
28083 posts
Posted on 8/8/09 at 10:46 am to
quote:

except in Lee's case there is no qb run option.

I think you missed the OPs point about the myth. JJ is supposedly the better option at QB because hes a dual threat. LSU doesnt have a dual threat, if "slow" JLee executes the option better, because
quote:

the quarterback tucking and running

If everyone can see where the ball is going, doesnt matter how fast the QB is. The play aint going anywhere.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425837 posts
Posted on 8/8/09 at 10:50 am to
why does a dual threat QB have to have his running judged solely from the option?
Posted by hojo
St. Louis, MO
Member since Mar 2005
1366 posts
Posted on 8/8/09 at 10:50 am to
Call me crazy, but I give JJ a better chance of making yards with a "poorer" play fake than I do with JL making a "great" play fake.

JL has no business running an option, any option. At least JJ can improve his play fakes.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425837 posts
Posted on 8/8/09 at 10:50 am to
quote:

Call me crazy, but I give JJ a better chance of making yards with a "poorer" play fake than I do with JL making a "great" play fake.

this was goin to be my next point

the rant hates thinking in this terms, b/c the rant loves guys who work hard, practice well, and develop perfect skills

talent often means a lot more, no matter how much the rant wishes to believe and hope otherwise
Posted by SloMeaux
Member since Sep 2004
23134 posts
Posted on 8/8/09 at 11:22 am to
Lee has always been a God at practice. That's how he earned the starting spot. I think it baffles coaches how he turns brilliant practices into game winning TD's for the OTHER team.
Posted by RobbBobb
Matt Flynn, BCS MVP
Member since Feb 2007
28083 posts
Posted on 8/8/09 at 11:31 am to
quote:

the rant hates thinking in this terms, b/c the rant loves guys who work hard, practice well, and develop perfect skills

talent often means a lot more, no matter how much the rant wishes to believe and hope otherwise

Wasnt that your Keiland Williams argument too?
Posted by RobbBobb
Matt Flynn, BCS MVP
Member since Feb 2007
28083 posts
Posted on 8/8/09 at 11:32 am to
quote:

game winning TD's for the OTHER team.

Because he's had none for his own team.

Posted by RobbBobb
Matt Flynn, BCS MVP
Member since Feb 2007
28083 posts
Posted on 8/8/09 at 11:33 am to
quote:

At least JJ can improve his play fakes.

But JLee cannot improve his defensive reads

:gotcha:
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425837 posts
Posted on 8/8/09 at 11:37 am to
quote:

Wasnt that your Keiland Williams argument too?

k-dub > hester

scott > hester

and JJ will start over Lee and will run for a shitload more yards b/c JJ is mobile
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425837 posts
Posted on 8/8/09 at 11:38 am to
quote:

But JLee cannot improve his defensive reads

he's not goin to improve his speed
Posted by HOUbengal
Houston
Member since Oct 2003
8123 posts
Posted on 8/8/09 at 11:40 am to
I havent read the thread past a few posts...

but if Lee runs ONE...just ONE freaking option play...then its ONE option too many.

It's simply stupid to have a QB that runs as if he has cement blocks attacked to his feet try and execute an option play.

Posted by RobbBobb
Matt Flynn, BCS MVP
Member since Feb 2007
28083 posts
Posted on 8/8/09 at 11:47 am to
quote:

JJ is mobile

The only reason that matters is when an offensive play breaks down (Sam Bradford, 70 yds rushing/ Heisman). If we have enough plays break down to make a difference in who should be QB, then we have a lot more problems than just at QB. And another long year.
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 8/8/09 at 11:52 am to
quote:

JL has no business running an option, any option.


ftw
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425837 posts
Posted on 8/8/09 at 11:53 am to
quote:

The only reason that matters is when an offensive play breaks down

or when we run the option, which we do with JJ (see: the peach bowl)

we're moving to a spread and spread option team
Posted by RobbBobb
Matt Flynn, BCS MVP
Member since Feb 2007
28083 posts
Posted on 8/8/09 at 11:56 am to
quote:

or when we run the option

right back to the OPs point. An option that is run poorly is not really an option, now is it?
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 8/8/09 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

right back to the OPs point. An option that is run poorly is not really an option, now is it?


when a QB is NO THREAT at all to actually run the option, the option play is pretty worthless.

you see, if the other team KNOWS that jarrett lee is the one running the option, they will just tackle the runningback running alongside him, because lee is not a threat.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
425837 posts
Posted on 8/8/09 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

An option that is run poorly is not really an option, now is it?

yes it is. did you watch our last bowl?

how about this. an option without 1 of the people handling the ball being a running threat isn't an option, is it? where is the "option" there?
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 8/8/09 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

how about this. an option without 1 of the people handling the ball being a running threat isn't an option, is it? where is the "option" there?


if i'm the defender, there isn't a "option" to tackle.

i'm tackling the runningback beside him, because lee poses NO THREAT to run for yards.

he's honestly like a steamboat pushing upstream when he runs.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram