- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Meachem Impressing Coaches at Camp
Posted on 8/6/09 at 8:37 am
Posted on 8/6/09 at 8:37 am
LINK
quote:
"This year they're going to get to see a first-round draft pick," Meachem promised. "The last two years, that's been somebody else."
3
Posted on 8/6/09 at 8:41 am to novowels
It appears he may beat out Devery for the 3rd spot. Regardless, he will get plenty of PT this year.
Posted on 8/6/09 at 8:42 am to novowels
According to the time value of money theory, what is a 1st round pick actually worth in year 3 considering he wasn't able to contribute at all Year 1 and did pretty alright in Year 2?
Posted on 8/6/09 at 8:52 am to NS Who Dat Nation
Haven't we heard this same song and dance before? Good play in camp doesn't translate to good play in games. However, he still beats out Henderson.
Posted on 8/6/09 at 9:03 am to Roach
quote:
It appears he may beat out Devery for the 3rd spot. Regardless, he will get plenty of PT this year.
I thought Devery was the #2 receiver.
Posted on 8/6/09 at 9:05 am to Lexo
quote:
I thought Devery was the #2 receiver.
A hobbled Lance Moore would still be a better #2 than Devery
Posted on 8/6/09 at 9:09 am to Rickety Cricket
There's been a great debate on whether Devery is a capable #2 guy:
LINK
I think it's pretty obvious that it goes Colston, Moore, Henderson, Meachem.
LINK
I think it's pretty obvious that it goes Colston, Moore, Henderson, Meachem.
Posted on 8/6/09 at 9:19 am to novowels
Hehehehehe
Posted on 8/6/09 at 9:35 am to Sophandros
quote:
Hehehehehe
at first I
then I
at the bump of the Devery thread....
ETA: I posted it in here because I refuse to post in the other one.
This post was edited on 8/6/09 at 9:36 am
Posted on 8/6/09 at 10:02 am to Black n Gold
quote:
Haven't we heard this same song and dance before? Good play in camp doesn't translate to good play in games. However, he still beats out Henderson.
not from here, the last 2 years he's been very disappointing in camp, basically getting bashed
Posted on 8/6/09 at 10:37 am to TigerBait1127
Besides, the only reason that people are swinging from Arrington's nuts is from his camp last year...
Posted on 8/6/09 at 10:38 am to Roach
When you run as many 3-4 wr sets as we do, arguing who is the second and third wr is pointless. IMHO.
Posted on 8/6/09 at 2:03 pm to Dicstick
sounds like a good problem to have... 
Posted on 8/6/09 at 3:18 pm to lsubeer
quote:
When you run as many 3-4 wr sets as we do, arguing who is the second and third wr is pointless. IMHO
The #2 guy definitely get more reps...Also, the Saints use many different player packages so the those 3-4 WR sets will have Reggie or Shockey in those spots sometimes
Posted on 8/7/09 at 12:54 am to NS Who Dat Nation
quote:
According to the time value of money theory, what is a 1st round pick actually worth in year 3 considering he wasn't able to contribute at all Year 1 and did pretty alright in Year 2?
Well, I guess you would consider his payments in years 1 and 2 sunk costs.
So, his value would be how well the coaches think he will perform based on his play in camp.
Posted on 8/7/09 at 8:43 am to shel311
What plenty of you seem to forget is that the WR position historically is one that takes, for some strange reason, 3 years to blossom. While there have been the rare gems that shine in years 2 or even 1, most WR's are judged based on their 3rd year of play. The "experts" opine on this all the time, so I think we should have faith and wait to see what this season brings for Meach.
Now I'm not saying that I think he'll be great this year, but I do think we should give him the benefit of the doubt and not rip him just yet. The guy has been and is a very dedicated and hard worker who is just a little slow in the cranium. I was never a fan of the pick myself, but I love the guy's attitude, love the Saints and am really behind him developing into a weapon for our team.
So let's sit back, chill, drink some whiskey and let the season unfold before we do the rip on Meach threads. Remember, 3 years for WR's....
Now I'm not saying that I think he'll be great this year, but I do think we should give him the benefit of the doubt and not rip him just yet. The guy has been and is a very dedicated and hard worker who is just a little slow in the cranium. I was never a fan of the pick myself, but I love the guy's attitude, love the Saints and am really behind him developing into a weapon for our team.
So let's sit back, chill, drink some whiskey and let the season unfold before we do the rip on Meach threads. Remember, 3 years for WR's....
Posted on 8/7/09 at 9:48 am to novowels
quote:
Josh McManus Impressing Coaches at Camp
Posted on 8/8/09 at 11:56 am to Towelie
Posted on 8/8/09 at 11:44 pm to Midget Death Squad
quote:
Midget Death Squad
You lead a very convincing argument. You, of course, get bonus points for your humorous name and pictures of women.
I agree with you completely on every level. I, despite the UT homer sway, thought it was a terrible pick. I was suprised he went into the draft at all, much less got picked first round. I recall some good play in the preseason, although i dont know if he was playing against a backup D or not. I wouldnt write him off yet.
Also, ive never heard of this 3-year thing for receivers. Can you give examples?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News